Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How Worcester might escape 35-point reduction

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Worcester Warriors are facing a 35 point Premiership sanction for entering administration but the Rugby Football Union could opt to waive any action by using a “no fault” clause that includes the impact of a pandemic.

ADVERTISEMENT

The key wording in the RFU regulations states: “Upon an affected Club’s application the RFU may in its absolute discretion reduce or waive in its entirety any sanction…. where it is satisfied that the Insolvency Event would not have occurred but for an event or circumstance which was beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the affected Club.”

However, to put themselves in line for help from the RFU, Worcester would have to prove they can still operate in administration which would require funds being put in by the current owners who have been silent throughout the growing crisis engulfing the club.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

If, as feared by Worcester supporters, owners Colin Goldring and Jason Whittingham only put the club and stadium into administration and keep the surrounding land in another company, then raising any funds to save Warriors will be extremely difficult.

Premiership Rugby is expected to issue a statement on the Worcester situation once the club has formally entered administration while they are also monitoring the financial problems Wasps are dealing with. Wasps, like Worcester, owe HMRC unpaid tax along with the £35m they raised in a bond issue that will have to be paid back.

The RFU regulations governing insolvency state:

Fixed Sanctions
5.5.5 Subject to Regulation 5.5.8, where a Club suffers an Insolvency Event during the Season or after the end of the Season but before the playing schedules have been set for the following Season, that Club’s most senior first XV team, as determined by the RFU, shall in respect of the following Season be relegated to the League below that in which it participated at the time the Insolvency Event occurred and there shall be no right of appeal for any such Club.

5.5.6 Subject to Regulation 5.5.8, where a Club suffers an Insolvency Event after the end of the Season and after the playing schedules have been set for the following Season, that Club’s most senior first XV team, as determined by the RFU, shall in respect of the following Season incur a 35 point deduction and there shall be no right of appeal for any such Club. Where the RFU is satisfied that the Insolvency Event was unavoidable before the end of the Season and had been delayed by the Club in order to avoid relegation, it shall be entitled in its absolute discretion to impose a further points deduction against that Club’s most senior first XV team and/or relegate that team the following Season to the League below that in which it participated at the time the Insolvency Event occurred, and there shall be no right of appeal for any such Club.

ADVERTISEMENT

No-fault Insolvency Events

5.5.9 Upon an affected Club’s application the RFU may in its absolute discretion reduce or waive in its entirety any sanction that would otherwise apply to a Club under Regulations 5.5.5 to 5.5.8 where it is satisfied that the Insolvency Event would not have occurred but for an event or circumstance which was beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the affected Club and which by the exercise of reasonable diligence the affected Club was unable to prevent, including (but not limited to): riot, war, invasion, act of foreign enemies, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, flood, fire or other physical natural disaster, strikes at national level or industrial disputes at a national level and any epidemic or pandemic as categorised as such by the UK Government and/or the World Health Organisation.

ADVERTISEMENT

South Africa v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

France v New Zealand | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

England v Wales | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

Lions Share | Episode 3

Zimbabwe vs Kenya | Rugby Africa Cup Semi Final | Full Match Replay

USA vs Spain | Men's International | Full Match Replay

Portugal vs Ireland | Men's International | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

P
PM 13 minutes ago
Why Henry Pollock's x-factor could earn him a Lions Test start

I have been following Lions tours for the last 30 odd years and I can’t remember one feeling as flat as this one, so your damp squib comment is a fair one.


I think there are a few reasons for this;


1) The opposition isn’t that strong this tour and hasn’t generated the normal excitement and uncertainty for the tests, most people are expecting 0-3 (which has never happened in living memory before).


2) The growing discontent within the fan base at the number of “outside BIL “ born players in the squad is a growing issue. The import issue has reached saturation point with some fans and is a bit negative element to this tour (will improve as nation switching becomes harder).


3) The rugby so far hasn’t been great and the tactics to date are not very exciting. People expected more from Andy Farrell and his Lions team.


4) Lions management have scored some own goals with the selection and subsequent call ups. It should have been the best 44 players from the start of the tour but the recent call ups have been underwhelming and damaged the Lions brand for some fans.


5) This tour would have been better if they merged Australia with Argentina and the Lions played Fiji as a warm up game to give the Pacific Nations a better chance of exposure and glory to grow the game. This is the sort of innovative thinking they need to bring out the magic of the Lions brand and create an exciting experience for all.


What’s become clear is the next tour needs to be an exciting one before people forget how magical a Lions tour can feel and the Lions brand is damaged to the point of questioning why it continues. The writing is on the wall, so lets hope the Lions see it and correct some of the above by the next tour.

102 Go to comments
P
PM 1 hour ago
Why Henry Pollock's x-factor could earn him a Lions Test start

Nick,

I am a long suffering England fan, who has had to endure watching 4 years of dull rugby, poor selections and painful defeats. Steve Borthwick talks about GPS and picks squads by numbers and then we put in a poor performance on the pitch - it’s been a consistent trend.


Something changed in the Six Nations and we totally changed our style (literally overnight) and played some really good footie, which finally felt like positive rugby for a change.


Genge has regained his pore-Covid form and is looking back to his best and is head and shoulders above Porter.


Chessum has had a good year and hasn’t played a poor International game this season.


Tom Curry was outstanding in the 6 Nations but they have been playing him at 6, wheras he is better at 7 and is lethal at the breakdown.


Tom Willis was brought into the starting team at 8 and has been one of the best England players over the last year, who should have been on this Lions tour at 8. Earl had his best game since 2020 last week - not sure 1 game warrants Lions selection over a poor combination side and he is certainly second choice for his club 7 country behind Willis.


Pollock will be a good player but like all young emerging players, he is inconsistent and can go quiet in games, which is why Curry should be the starter at 7. He brings energy to games, which is why he is good from the bench but there is an argument to say he is the 5th best England openside (Curry x2, Underhill & Earl are currently better) but will improve over the next 5 years. We just need to stop the media building him up for a fall, let him play and develop and you will see a sensational Henry Pollock for the Lions in 4 years time.


Lions will be too powerful over 80 mins, so doesn’t really matter who they pick. Just please don’t put too much hype on Pollock. His 20 mins of International rugby going into this tour were positive but the media caused a frenzy and no other player would be selected on this basis.


Let’s enjoy the rugby and give Pollock the space and time he requires.

102 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Robertson on the All Blacks' new lineout innovations and the guru behind them Robertson on the All Blacks' new lineouts