What's killing the Wallabies: 'I haven't seen a ruck stat this low at International rugby'
It's been a rough start for Eddie Jones' Wallabies, falling to two unflattering defeats in their opening two matches under the new head coach.
Expectations for the team were, and remain, a tale of two extremes with a myriad of factors to consider. Nevertheless, Jones continues to do what he does best, talk his team up and his latest headline-grabber, claiming the All Blacks should "look out" in their upcoming Test at the MCG is doing little in the way of comforting a nation that just wants to see some results.
Jones was only ever going to have five Tests before the World Cup kicked off to get his team aligned and ready to face Wales, Fiji, Georgia and Portugal in Pool C. Now two games into that preparation, the sample size has offered more concern than hope.
The Aotearoa Rugby Pod gave their insights on what is troubling the Wallabies so far and shared their concerns over the complexity of the game plan and the potential free-for-all that has been presented as a selection policy.
The consequences of those elements are a lack of clarity on the field and busy minds that aren't in the best space for critical decision-making.
Of chief concern was how those elements were disrupting the team's efficiency around the ruck.
"Their attacking breakdown, (you need) tight pods, clarity. 'I'm carrying, you're cleaning'," Former All Black James Parsons said.
"I haven't seen a ruck stat this low at international rugby. 88%, they won on their own ball at ruck time. Argentina were at 90%, the All Blacks were at 97%, the Springboks were at 97%.
"I've never seen it go into the 80s in terms of losing your own attacking breakdown, so there's some serious work to do. I do think you can put that down - because it's not a skillset thing - there's a lot of new systems.
"To me, it looks so cluttered and so much is going on in terms of the decisions they're making, and then they're chasing their tail."
It wasn't all doom and gloom though, the team's defence racked up an impressive tally at an impressive success rate.
"On the flip side for them, defensively, 91% (tackle completion), and they made Argentina work and work and work. In an area that shows attitude, I think you can have confidence that they're all there fronting up.
"On attack, they can be a bit better and around that defensive breakdown they can be a little bit smarter around when there's an opportunity and when there's not. Because they should trust their defence, 91% making over 200 tackles is outstanding at international level."
Parsons added a specific example of poor decision-making, recalling a Wallabies player being penalised for playing the ball on the ground while laying in front of the ref. To the podcast's panel, it was further evidence of the players being focused on fighting for their positions while trying to execute a whole new system and "overtrying" amongst it all.
The remedy, in the pundits' eyes, was to "lean up the menu". In other words, simplify the game plan so the players are more clear on their roles and can be more present, just playing the game as it happens in front of them.
Despite the team's early struggles, there was plenty of optimism around what the team can achieve if the attack is cleared up and systems are better established, given the intent of the defence.
Latest Comments
The boy needs to bulk up if wants to play 10 or 11 to handle those hits, otherwise he could always make a brilliant reserve for the wings if he stays away from the stretcher.
Go to commentsIn another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.
First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.
They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.
Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.
Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.
That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup
Go to comments