Ink-redible! Gloucester to cover tattoo costs
After revealing a new club logo, Gloucester have offered to cover the cost for any supporter who wishes to update their tattoo accordingly.
The Premiership outfit, who have recently announced the marquee signings of Jaco Kriel and Danny Cipriani for the 2018-19 season, showed off a new look on Tuesday.
Passionate fans who opted to have the previous club logo inked onto their body may have been disappointed by the news, but Gloucester had a novel idea.
A statement on the club's official Twitter account on Wednesday read: "If anybody who has the previous Gloucester Rugby logo as a tattoo (2007 - 2018) and wants to have a tattoo of the new logo then the club will cover the cost of this.
"Get in touch with the club before the start of the new season, via email to admin@gloucesterugby.co.uk to arrange and find out more details."
Good news for a select number of fans ... not to mention Gloucester's tattoo parlours!
Latest Comments
Has there ever been a Red and Black you don't rate GP over the years? However to be fair most of your favs have had the goods.
Go to commentsI'm not very hopeful of a better change to the sport. Putting an Aussie in charge after they failed for two decades is just disgusting. What else will be brought in to weaken the game? What new rule changes will be made? How will the game be grown?
Nothing of value in this letter. There is no definitive drive towards something better. Just more of the same as usual. The most successful WC team is getting snubbed again and again for WC's hosting rights. What will make other competitions any different?
My beloved rugby is already a global sport. Why is there no SH team chosen between the Boks, AB's, Wallabies and Fiji? Like a B&I Lions team to tour Europe and America? A team that could face not only countries but also the B&I Lions? Wouldn't that make for a great spectacle that will also bring lots of eyeballs to the sport?
Instead with an Aussie in charge, rugby will become more like rugby league. Rugby will most likely become less global if we look at what have become of rugby in Australia. He can't save rugby in Australia, how will he improve the global footprint of rugby world wide?
I hope to be proven wrong and that he will raise up the sport to new heights, but I am very much in doubt. It's like hiring a gardener to a CEO position in a global company expecting great results. It just won't happen. Call me negative or call me whatever you'd like, Robinson is the wrong man for the job.
Go to comments