'It wasn't just him' - Cheika on axing friend Larkam and 'four or five others'
Wallabies coach Michael Cheika admits he may have lost a friend but he had to shrug off the emotion of sacking Stephen Larkham for the good of the team.
Larkham, Australia's attack coach since 2015, was the high-profile fall guy of Rugby Australia's review of the Wallabies' worst season in 60 years in 2019.
The Wallabies won just four of 13 Tests, with all the coaching staff including Australia's 1999 World Cup hero Larkham, in the firing line.
Cheika's soul-searching over what to do next led to his proposal to axe the former Australian flyhalf, as well as "four or five others".
"Tough," Cheika told an Irish sports podcast in Dublin of his decision to dispense with Larkham.
"For a friend, maybe not anymore, I'm not sure.
"But one thing's for sure: I don't blame anyone for anything."
Crowned world coach of the year in 2015 after teaming with Larkham to take the Wallabies to the final of the last global showpiece, Cheika said he nev er doubted his own ability as Australia's head coach after last year's poor performances.
But he asked himself: "What am I going to do?"
"More challenging myself as to what will be the thing I do now to make the change?" Cheika said.
"And after the season I spent a week really detailed, just myself, going through - removing the emotional connections - and going through exactly what I needed to do to make sure that this season was bright and more enjoyable and that we don't live the peaks and troughs.
"(That) we just build and build and build until we get to where we want to go."
Cheika said he had to balance taking responsibility, protecting people and at the same time "shake it up a little bit".
"So (it was) very tough but I just think that sometimes you’ve got to make those (decisions). It wasn't just him," Cheika said.
"There were four or five others that we made changes to in the team and I’m sure that when we go to the World Cup the team will be in the right position and feeling the right way, partly because of some of those changes of what’s come in and what we’ve needed to change."
AAP
Latest Comments
It is crystal clear that people who make such threats on line should be tried and imprisoned. Those with responsibility in social media companies who don’t facilitate this should be convicted. In real life, I have free speech to approach someone like Reinach and verbally threaten him. I am risking a conviction or a slap but I could do it. In the old days, If someone anonymously threatened someone by letter the police would ask and use evidence from the postal system. Unlike the Post, social media companies have complete instant and legal access to the content in social media. They make money from the data, billions. Yet, they turn a blind eye to terrorism, Nazi-ism and industrial levels of threats against individuals including their address and childrens schools being published online all from ananoymous accounts not real speech. They claim free speech. The fault is with the perps but also social media companies who think anonymous personas posting death threats constitutes free speech.
Go to commentsSo if this ain’t the best Irish team ever then who exactly is? I don’t remember any other Irish team being this good & winning a series in the Land of the Long White Cloud. Yes I may rip them often for 8 X QF RWC exits & twice not even making it to the QF, but they’re a damn good team who many think can only improve, including me!
Go to comments