Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'It went much deeper than that' - The psychological exploitation the Springboks used on Jerome Garces to help sway the World Cup final

(Photo by David Ramos - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

An explosive new book has detailed the lengths Rassie Erasmus and the Springboks took to psychologically expoit referee Jerome Garces in the Rugby World Cup final with the aim of getting marginal decisions to fall their way.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Springbok camp extensively researched the mannerisms and demeanour of leading referees, including personality traits, which could be manipulated to paint a picture in their favour. For Garces, it included lathering him with praise over his physique and fitness which they found would positively influence him.

Author Lloyd Burnard explained the layers of analysis taken by the Springboks on each referee to understand their interpretations of the rules.

Video Spacer

What it is like trying to get a seat on the All Blacks bus

Video Spacer

What it is like trying to get a seat on the All Blacks bus

“The research included analysis on how the referees blew games of rugby, from scrummaging to the dark arts at the breakdown and the offside line,” author of the new book ‘Miracle Men’, revealed in an excerpt published by SA Rugby Magazine.

“But it went much deeper than that.

“The level of detail in the refereeing reports included personality traits, all with the hope of finding an edge.”

The analysis led the Springboks to ‘role play’ match discussions with referees to practice and refine their approach to swaying the ref.  The Springboks would role play at team meetings and at training sessions, practising what they would say knowing what their research had shown them.

“The report compiled on Garces, for example, revealed that he responded well to being complimented on his physical appearance.

“If the match was fast-paced, the Boks would make a point of praising Garces on his condition and his ability to keep up with the players, hoping to rub him up the right way.”

Farrell talks rugby law
England’s Owen Farrell talks to World Cup final referee Jerome Garces (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)
ADVERTISEMENT

Each Springbok player was responsible for different aspects of the game, with hookers Bongi Mbonambi and Malcolm Marx overseeing the scums and lineouts to make sure that the Springboks complied with Garces preference which was that he ‘took kindly to sides that provided a clean set piece’.

“He [Garces] didn‘t want people wandering around aimlessly at lineout and scrum time; he wanted the players to be in their positions and ready to proceed with the game.

“He wanted structure, and the Springbok hookers would check in with him throughout the match to make sure they were in the right places at the right times for a set piece, doing their bit to make the game as clean as possible,” the book notes.

They decided on a ‘good cop, bad cop’ approach with Duane Vermeulen and Siya Kolisi in dealing with Garces during the final, helping Kolisi come across to Garces as the respectful captain as the ‘good cop’.

One of the more cunning tactics was to act subservient when speaking to the referee by bending down or kneeling when talking to match officials to give them the feeling of being more powerful or in control as they spoke down to players. They would bend down to tie shoe laces or feign being out of breath and bend down with hands on knees to inhale.

Burnard says even the management team devoted time to preparing for referees, likely more than any other team at the 2019 Rugby World Cup.

 

ADVERTISEMENT
LIVE

The Classics vs Pasifika Legends

South Africa v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

France v New Zealand | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

England v Wales | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

Lions Share | Episode 3

Zimbabwe vs Kenya | Rugby Africa Cup Semi Final | Full Match Replay

USA vs Spain | Men's International | Full Match Replay

Portugal vs Ireland | Men's International | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jfp123 30 minutes ago
France push All Blacks to 80th minute in narrow Dunedin defeat

So, you think top rugby players’ wages ought to be kept artificially low, when in fact the forces of “demand and supply” mean that many can and indeed are commanding wages higher than you approve of, and even though players regularly get injured, and those injuries can be serious enough to cut short careers and even threaten lives, e.g. Steven Kitshoff.

.

As far as I can make out your objections amount to

1) they’ve sent a B team, which is not what we do and I don’t like it. Is there more to it than that? You haven’t replied to the points I made previously about sell out Tests and high ticket prices, so I take it reduced earnings are no longer part of your argument. Possibly you’re disappointed at not seeing Dupont et al., but a lot of New Zealanders think he is over rated anyway.


2) The Top 14 is paying players too much, leading to wage inflation around the world which is bad for the sport.

Firstly, young athletes have a range of sports to choose from, so rugby holding out the prospect of a lucrative, glamorous career helps attract talent.

Above all, market forces mean the French clubs earn a lot of money, and spend a large part of that money on relatively high wages, within a framework set by the league to maintain the health of the league. This framework includes the salary cap and Jiff rules which in effect limit the number of foreign stars the clubs employ and encourage the development of young talent, so there is a limit on Top14 demand. The Toulon of the 2010s is a thing of the past.


So yes, the French clubs cream off some top players - they are competitive sports teams, what do expect them to do with their money? - but there’s still a there’s a plentiful supply of great rugby players and coaches without French contracts. The troubles in England and Wales were down to mismanagement of those national bodies, and clubs themselves, not the French


So if you don’t want to let market forces determine wage levels, and you do want to prevent the French clubs from spending so much of their large incomes on players, how on earth do you want to set player wages?


Is the problem that NZ can’t pay so much as the Top 14 and you fear the best players will be lured away and/or you want NZ franchises to compete for leading international talent? Are you asking for NZ wage scales to be adopted as the maximum allowed, to achieve this? But in that case why not take Uruguay, or Spain, or Tonga or Samoa as the standard, so Samoa, a highly talented rugby nation, can keep Samoan players in Samoa, not see them leave for higher wages in NZ and elsewhere.

Rugby is played in lots of countries, with hugely varying levels of financial backing etc. Obviously, it’s more difficult for some than others, but aside for a limited amount of help from world rugby, it’s up to each one to make their sums add up, and make the most of the particular advantages their nation/club/franchise has. SA are not the richest, but are still highly successful, and I don’t hear them complaining about Top14 wages.


Many, particularly second tier, nations benefit from the Top14, and anyone genuinely concerned about the whole community of world rugby should welcome that. England and NZ have laid down rules so they can’t make the most of the French competition, which is up to them. But unlike some NZ fans and pundits, the English aren’t generally blaming their own woes on the French, rather they want reform of the English structure, and some are calling for lessons to learned from their neighbours across the channel. If NZ fans aren’t satisfied, I suggest they call for internal reform, not try to make the French scapegoats.


In my opinion, a breach of standards would be to include on your team players who beat up women, not to regularly send a B team on the summer tours for reasons of player welfare, which in all the years you’ve been doing this only some of the pundits and fans of a single country have made a stink about.


[my comments here are, of course, not aimed at all NZ fans and pundits]

266 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Iconic Lions moments of the professional era: 10-6 Iconic Lions moments of the professional era: 10-6