Itchy investors agitated over SANZAAR deliberations
The various private ownership interests in Super Rugby clubs are becoming increasingly frustrated with the ongoing SANZAAR debate around the future shape of the tournament, with some now calling for an independent tournament commission to safeguard their investments.
As it stands, no decision has yet been made on the exact future make-up of Super Rugby but, as reported in the Watercooler two weeks ago, New Zealand Rugby has made a recommendation to the other SANZAAR partners to cut two South African teams and one Australian team in order to simplify the conference format.
Australian club CEOs met on Tuesday to discuss the proposal but have been gagged by the Australian Union which still has not formulated an official response to the recommendations. It is also believed the NZ CEOs were briefed on Wednesday with explicit caution issued regarding private owners opening a dialogue with their Australian equivalents.
The ARU does not seem to be in a great position to negotiate, having spent millions in recent seasons propping up the balance sheets of its teams. As one insider said “the entire proposal feels like McDonald's telling Burger King to get rid of three of their restaurants.”
The South African governing body, SARU, is also in a parlous financial position. According to sources inside the discussions, SARU has not dismissed the proposal out of hand, and is seriously considering culling two of its teams. Cheetahs boss Harold Verster claimed on Monday that his club was safe from the cull, sparking widespread speculation that a ‘Super 16’ was still very much on the cards.
Regardless of where negotiations lead, private interests in the competition have discussed the possibility of forming an NRL-style commission. SANZAAR as a governing body is the centralised tool of the various member unions, rather than an independent voice solely promoting the interests of the competition.
Private owners say it is imperative that, like the NRL, A-League, and AFL, Super Rugby can stand on its own feet as a competition, rather than operating as a feeder system for the international game, which remains under the auspices of the unions that constitute SANZAAR, and out of the hands of outside investors.
Latest Comments
The New Zealand performance in the return fixture in 2016 was filthy. A lot of Irish supporters were pretty shocked by it, viewed it as de facto cheating just to avoid another defeat.
Also shocked by the abuse to Ireland, captain, vice-captain and spectators after the full time whistle in Paris defeat, last match.
Sledging is sledging, but that happens during the game and targetting spectators should be completely out of bounds.
The Irish public used to enjoy these matches, even in defeat. Now they are necessary but unpleasant, because NZ apparently cannot accept or respect successful challengers.
Go to commentsThanks for the analysis Nick, thought provoking as usual. Couple of queries though, in the pic where you've circled Williams bind , I'm pretty sure it shows Stuart's knee on the ground, surely that's a NZ penalty? Also having had the chance to watch it again the All Black scrum seeems to improve after halftime, but before either England or the All Blacks replace their props. Not sure if that was the result of Tuipolutu coming on or some halftime tips. Either way this is only Williams second international season, so he'll be better for the experience.
Go to comments