Itoje: 'I wouldn't want anybody or everybody knowing exactly what I'm earning'
Maro Itoje would oppose the salaries of players in the Gallagher Premiership being made public as a measure to provide greater transparency in their clubs’ adherence to salary cap regulations.
Saracens will be relegated into the second tier of English club rugby at the end of the season for repeatedly breaching the £7million limit imposed on all 12 sides in the top flight.
The salary cap system is currently being independently reviewed, with one possible future recommendation being the publication of all salaries, as is common in American team sports such as NFL.
Itoje, however, believes it would be a step too far.
“I’m sure it works in a lot of different places but, believe it or not, when it comes to finances I’m quite a private person,” the England lock said.
“On an individual level, I wouldn’t want anybody or everybody knowing exactly what I’m earning, but fortunately we’re not public officials – well I’m not one quite yet! – so I don’t think there’s a genuine need for that.
“Obviously there is a salary cap manager and that’s his job is to make sure everything is as it should be.”
None of Saracens’ players are at fault for the salary cap transgressions but, in the report of the last three seasons’ breaches, evidence was presented showing that Itoje had been paid £1.6million for a 30 per cent share of his image rights.
An alternative valuation commissioned by Premier Rugby Limited estimated that Itoje was overpaid by £800,000 and this amount was thus deemed to be salary.
When asked if he still has business dealings with Saracens’ former owner and chairman Nigel Wray, who bankrolled the club, Itoje explained: “Nothing has changed.
“When I entered into them, they were all – to my knowledge – above board. There wasn’t any intention or even a thought that this was not above board.
“Nothing I entered into was with the intention of… there wasn’t even the slightest thought of it being not allowed by the salary cap manager.
“Obviously the situation is very different now. It is very clear that whatever you do, you have to get it checked by the salary cap manager. That’s the reality of the situation.”
Itoje’s name appeared in the leaked version of the report in what the British and Irish Lions lock views as an “invasion of privacy”.
Jamie George is the only member of Saracens’ England contingent to publicly voice his desire to stay at Allianz Park next season, with Itoje revealing negotiations are ongoing.
“We’ve had discussions with the club about what could potentially happen next year, what things are going to be in place. Nothing has been finalised yet,” Itoje said.
“What has happened, has happened. No one at the club wanted this to happen and no one at the club envisaged this would happen.
“The club have said their piece. They have apologised and my mindset is forward, rather than backwards.”
Latest Comments
The boy needs to bulk up if wants to play 10 or 11 to handle those hits, otherwise he could always make a brilliant reserve for the wings if he stays away from the stretcher.
Go to commentsIn another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.
First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.
They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.
Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.
Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.
That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup
Go to comments