'It's classic Eddie Jones, isn't it?': England coach's comments refuted
Two Super Rugby centurions have rubbished comments from Eddie Jones that suggested the Wallabies had the rub of the green in their win over England on Saturday.
Australia lock Darcy Swain was sent from the field in the Xth minute of the match after headbutting opposite Jonny Hill. Despite the numbers advantage, however, England failed to capitalise until the final moments of the match.
With the scores 6-apiece at halftime, Australia scored three tries to England's one in the following 37 minutes to build a sizeable 16-point lead. England finally burst to life with time almost up on the clock to score two quick tries but it was too little too late, with the home team ultimately triumphing 30-28.
In England's post-match press conference, head coach Jones implied that Kiwi referee James Doleman had been more lenient on the Wallabies following Swain's red card.
"That always happens, mate. If you look at the history of the game, whenever you get a red card, the referee evens it up,” Jones said.
“Social reciprocity. That happens, mate. That’s normal. We’ve got to be good enough to handle it.
“That happens in every game of rugby I’ve seen where a team gets a red card … because they’re nice blokes, referees.
“I’m not criticising the referee at all, I’m not using it as an excuse, that’s just the reality of rugby.”
Speaking on the latest episode of the Aotearoa Rugby Pod, former Crusaders halfback Bryn Hall and former Blues hooker James Parsons both suggested Jones was simply trying to draw attention away from his team's less-than-satisfactory performance.
"I don't think [Australia got the rub of the green]," said Hall, who started at No 9 in the Crusaders' Super Rugby Pacific grand final victory over the Blues but has not signed to play in Japan. "It's classic Eddie Jones, isn't it? To be able to have a [controversial] talking point [after a defeat].
"The Australians were down with the red card for the whole [second half]. For England, you should be really getting yourself up to win that game so it takes away all the external noise that's been said around how they should have won that game and the way they didn't perform to get that result."
Parsons, who played two tests for the All Blacks in 2014 and 2016, agreed that Jones had simply been trying to distract from his side's loss and potentially influence the officials for the remainder of the series.
"I think this is Eddie trying to get an adjustment for the second test," Parsons said. "He's always got a plan, he's always got a mind game.
"I saw those comments and thought, 'Oh I don't really agree with that', so I went back and watched afterwards and in my interpretation of the laws, everything was fair and very clear.
"I just think he's playing games for test two and just trying to get people to think - and look, it worked, because it made me think. But no, I thought it was very well reffed, to be honest."
England and Australia will square off once more this weekend, this time at Suncorp Stadium in Brisbane. Ireland's Andrew Brace will take the whistle for the match.
Latest Comments
The boy needs to bulk up if wants to play 10 or 11 to handle those hits, otherwise he could always make a brilliant reserve for the wings if he stays away from the stretcher.
Go to commentsIn another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.
First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.
They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.
Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.
Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.
That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup
Go to comments