Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

I've given Raynal plenty of stick but he got this one spot on - Andy Goode

(Photo by William West/ AFP Via Getty)

I’ve given Mathieu Raynal plenty of stick over the years and there were a fair few calls in the latest Bledisloe Cup encounter that could warrant criticism but the controversial ending to the game isn’t one of them.

ADVERTISEMENT

The ball-in-play time is a hot topic in rugby at the moment, with time-wasting something I think everyone wants to see being clamped down on, so I think he was spot on to give Bernard Foley the hurry up and penalise him when he was repeatedly ignored.

In truth, it was poor game management from Foley, who had been outstanding up to that point. He could’ve taken longer to get the ball in his hands or kicked to touch and taken time to form the lineout but you can’t take no notice of the referee when you’ve got the ball in your hands.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

As a fly half, I’ve been warned hundreds of times by referees for taking too long but I wasn’t penalised because I listened and booted the ball into touch. The referee is always right and play to the whistle are things you learn as a kid and Foley simply fell foul of that.

Bernard Foley. (Photo by Kazuhiro Nogi/AFP)

It’s natural that the amount of time you take to kick to touch is going to come under greater scrutiny in the final moments of a game when you’re in the lead but I’ve watched the game back and he did definitely take longer than he had been doing previously.

The fact that his team-mates can be seen shouting at him to get on with it in the background just adds to the sense that he was playing with fire.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Wallabies can’t have it both ways when it comes to time either and they certainly took advantage of knocking over a quick conversion after one of Andrew Kellaway’s tries to reduce the chances of Raynal checking for a forward pass.

As with all aspects of refereeing, all players, coaches, fans and everyone else in the game want is consistency so the hope is that other referees do the same if a similar situation presents itself in the club or international game this weekend.

There was certainly inconsistency in Raynal’s adjudication of the scrum and breakdown in that match, to put it mildly, and his decision to only give Darcy Swain a yellow card for his hit on the leg of Quinn Tupaea was really poor.

Related

TMO Ben Whitehouse drew Raynal’s attention to the incident but, without following the normal procedure and consulting with the TMO and assistant referees as to the appropriate sanction, he just brandished a yellow.

ADVERTISEMENT

That was as clear a red card as you can get and up there with the worst incidents I’ve seen on a rugby field in recent years. It was clearly deliberate and has left Tupaea facing around nine months out with a ruptured MCL and partial ACL tear in his left knee.

World Rugby are doing their best to protect players from such acts and outlawed the crocodile roll after Jack Willis was horribly injured in less deliberate circumstances not so long ago. Not to put too fine a point on it, hopefully Swain has the book thrown at him.

In terms of time-wasting, I know it’s something World Rugby want to cut down on, and we’ve seen directives issued on water carriers for example, so it remains to be seen whether we see more examples punished in the coming weeks.

I don’t think you can put a shot clock on kicks to touch, in the same way the Top 14 does on attempts from the tee, and the only way you can really achieve complete consistency is to go down the route of the timekeeper stopping the clock in all instances when the ball is dead.

(Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

It’s perfectly reasonable for the referee to be entrusted with having a feel for the game and keeping the pace up. It’s even more reasonable to expect players to listen to him. Foley didn’t and Australia paid the price.

It’s a shame that one decision is attracting so much attention at the end of one of the most absorbing Test matches I’ve seen in a hell of a long time but Raynal got it absolutely spot on in my opinion.

Whatever your opinion on that time-wasting call, and most with Australian connections are certainly spitting feathers, the one certainty is that the man in the middle isn’t going to have it any easier when the re-match takes place at Eden Park next weekend. Over to you Andrew Brace!

ADVERTISEMENT

South Africa v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

France v New Zealand | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

England v Wales | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

Lions Share | Episode 3

Zimbabwe vs Kenya | Rugby Africa Cup Semi Final | Full Match Replay

USA vs Spain | Men's International | Full Match Replay

Portugal vs Ireland | Men's International | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

9 Comments
r
rob 1032 days ago

This sits with the ref. The outcome he should be focused on is preserving the time on the clock, given the game was in the 78'min. The ref is the only one who can call time off and he should have done this straight after awarding Australia the penalty, but no he waits 20+ sec, then calls time off and back on within 7 sec, penalising Foley as he is kicking the ball. So the ref was the one wasting game time and should be called out.

S
SF 1034 days ago

Our Bok team is the biggest time wasters in rugby. And it drives us Bok supporters insane believe it or not.

Something must be done about it.

Now a ref did do something about it and AUS paid the price.

It is just a pity it had to happen in such a fantastic test match at such a crucial time in the match. The ref was right. I feel sorry for the Wallabies in some way.

But it is whatt it is.

Hopefully the rest of the rugby world got a wake up call. Including the Springboks.

M
Michael Röbbins (academic and writer extraordinair 1035 days ago

“the referee is always right” is all one needs to see to realize the staggering stupidity of this vapid argument, if one can dignify it as such. I mean surely AG is a rational human being replete with mind and consciousness, but the insipidity of such a statement betrays a dimwittedness the likes of which one rarely witnesses, unless BS scrawls something from the abyss of despair he pops up from bi-monthly.

J
JB 1034 days ago

Lol. Frothing at someone for being irrational is like screaming at someone to calm down. Get some slept mate, you’ll be ok.

D
Duncan 1034 days ago

– The referee is the sole judge of fact and of Law during a match. The referee must apply


fairly all the Laws of the Game in every match.


– The referee keeps the time.


– The referee keeps the score.


– The referee gives permission to the players to leave the playing area.


– The referee gives permission to the replacements or substitutes to enter the playing area.


– The referee gives permission to the team doctors or medically trained persons or their assistants to enter the playing area, as and when permitted by the Law.


– The referee gives permission to each of the coaches to enter the playing area at half-time to attend to their teams during the interval.

R
Robert 1035 days ago

Agree with you Andy, but time wasting happens in nearly all matches and is ignored.

J
Jaap 1025 days ago

People keep saying this but no one has managed to point out even a single instance that four or five warnings, including a specific time-stoppage, has then been ignored twice more, and play be allowed to continue.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

D
DarstedlyDan 53 minutes ago
New Zealanders may not understand, but in France Test rugby is the 'B movie'

Italy have a top 14 issue too, that’s true. I doubt SA are overly pleased by that, although it’s countered somewhat by the fact they would expect to thrash them anyway, so perhaps are not that bothered.


The BIL teams are (aside from Ireland) A/B teams - still with many A team players. I would rather the England team touring Argentina be playing the ABs than this French one.


France could have reduced the complaints and the grounds for such if they had still picked the best team from those eligible/available. But they haven’t even done that. This, plus the playing of silly b@ggers with team selection over the three tests is just a big middle finger to the ABs and the NZ rugby public.


One of the key reasons this is an issue is the revenue sharing one. Home teams keep the ticket revenues. If the July tours are devalued to development larks then the crowds will not show up (why go watch teams featuring names you’ve never heard of?). This costs the SH unions. The NH unions on the other hand get the advantage of bums on seats from full strength SH teams touring in November. If the NH doesn’t want to play ball by touring full strength, then pay up and share gate receipts. That would be fair, and would reduce the grounds for complaint from the south. This has been suggested, but the NH unions want their cake and eat it too. And now, apparently, we are not even allowed to complain about it?


Finally - no one is expecting France to do things the way NZ or SA do. We oddly don’t really mind that it probably makes them less successful at RWC than they would otherwise have been. But a bit of willingness to find a solution other than “lump it, we’re French” would go a looonnng way.

77 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Southern hemisphere heavyweights to contest World Rugby U20s final Southern hemisphere heavyweights to contest World Rugby U20s final