Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Jake White's radical idea to make South Africa a Champions Cup force

(Photo by Charly Triballeau/AFP via Getty Images)

Bulls boss Jake White has claimed a radical rethink must happen if teams from South Africa are to dominate in the Heineken Champions Cup. Three franchises – including White’s own club – took part in this season’s 24-team tournament for the first time and while all three progressed to the round-of-16 after the pool stages, only two made it to the quarter-finals and none will play in the semi-finals at the end of April.

ADVERTISEMENT

Top 14 giants Toulouse knocked out the Bulls and the Sharks on successive weekends in France while the Premiership-based Exeter picked off the Stormers in their last-eight encounter last Saturday in England.

The demise of the South African challenge has resulted in a general disappointment that its teams don’t have the strength in depth that its European-based rivals have and White claimed that this imbalance won’t be rectified unless a major decision is taken about eligibility to play for the Springboks.

Video Spacer

WATCH as Alan Quinlan and Schalk Burger preview the weekend’s Round 17 URC matches

Video Spacer

WATCH as Alan Quinlan and Schalk Burger preview the weekend’s Round 17 URC matches

The 2007 World Cup-winning coach believes that far too many Test players currently play overseas and he wants the regulation to be amended so that if someone wants to play for South Africa, they must play for a local club rather than earn their wage in France, England, Japan and so on.

White was speaking ahead of this weekend’s URC/Currie Cup double-header for the Bulls which sees them in URC action on Saturday versus Zebre Parma in Johannesburg after taking on the Sharks in the Currie Cup in Durban the day before.

Related

Asked how the South African franchises can become more competitive at Champions Cup level, White said: “We can only do that if we can keep all the best players in South Africa and the way we do that is to make sure that any player who plays abroad is not eligible to play for South Africa. That is the only way.

“If we want to save the domestic game and we want to save the franchises in South Africa and you want to compete at that level, once you put your name down to play in the Heineken Cup you have to beat La Rochelle away, you have to beat Saracens away or you have to beat Toulouse away – then you have to have the best players here.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I said it to a French journalist last week when I was in Toulouse, we had three teams in the round-of-16 and if you look at the rest of the teams, look at the players out of Leinster, Leicester, Sale, Ulster, there is probably another three teams there of quality players. You have got guys like Jasper Wiese, Duane Vermeulen, Jason Jenkins, I mean the list goes on and on and on and on. That means that we probably could have six teams in the top 16.

“Now once you put those six teams into four teams (in South Africa) then all of a sudden everything changes. Then you have the ability to actually compete against those best teams (like Toulouse). The way it is now you have got 300 professional players playing aboard and some of them are the best players in our country – you just have to look at the make-up of the national team. That just proves that we need those guys back in South Africa. There is no other way you can do it.

“People debate with me about money, but it can’t be about money. It has got to be about the desire to be a Springbok and the desire to play international rugby because, as I said, if you are wearing a provincial hat, you can’t have a situation where all the best players are playing (overseas). I mean we go and play Duane Vermeulen, who is at Ulster, and it’s bizarre. He could have been playing for the Bulls.

“That is the way forward. I know you are not going to keep everybody but if you get 50 per cent of those guys back and you put them into the franchises, all of a sudden the franchises get better, the Currie Cup teams get better and it filters all the way down. Then you don’t have a watered-down Currie Cup; you don’t have a team in URC that maybe will be okay but the problem is you can’t go the next step up.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I genuinely think that if the influx of those players come in, make the four regions very strong, they can compete in Heineken Cup and then it means at URC they will also be very strong which means they should all try and make the Champions Cup.

“Then you go down one level and all the players would have an opportunity to play in the Currie Cup and the Currie Cup would also have some sort of kudos and credence in South Africa.”

ADVERTISEMENT

England XV v France XV | Full Match Replay

South Africa v British & Irish Lions | 1997 | Second Test | The Vaults

"The Opportunity Of A Lifetime" | Wallabies All In: Episode 1

Are these the best ever Lions performances?

Pollock Loses Bill, Players Meet Their Roommates & Training in Portugal | Ep 1: The Ultimate Test

Top 10 inspiring Lions speeches

United States of Rugby | Episode 1 – Welcome to Dawgtown

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
M
Michael Röbbins (academic and writer extraordinair 801 days ago

Extraordinarily stupid, silly take: “only” 2 of 3 progressed? Pretty gol’darn good strike rate for a collective nation’s first go round in the comp. Incredibly higher percentage of teams than all other nations that have been competing in this thing since the beginning. 1/4 of Ireland, 3/11 of England, 2/14 of France, nil from any other country, Jesus wept. This competition has been in recent memory and will continue to be not “Europe” but the “Leinster, Toulouse, La Rochelle” invitational.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 1 hour ago
Scott Robertson names his 35-man All Blacks squad for France series

As always with Razor slightly unorthodox with a few surprises. Last year Blackadder was rushed back into the starting 15 after a long injury lay off and no game time, this year on the back of a good body of work in which he was immense in the final he doesn’t even make the squad. But Finau, who possibly wouldn’t have even been starting for the Chiefs if Parker was fit is the only specialist 6 in the squad. Likewise Havili, great season and a great final, much better than last year by all measures but doesn’t make the cut.


6 mid fielders when 4 will do, but only 5 loosies when 7 would be useful -> Maybe Lakai and Parker come in? No 3rd choice at 10 meaning if one of BB or DMac sustain a mid to long term injury there is no one they are specifically trusting to come into the team and be able to close out matches - maybe they think Love is the 3rd best 10 in NZ?


Great to see Tavatavanawai straight in on the back of a huge season - he should 100% be in the 23. There have been players before like Stevenson or Sotutu who had the season of the their lives and didn’t get picked, so this is great and a little surprising to see.


Only 4 locks and no lock cover among the loosies named. This seems like an area we need to be developing more players rather than concentrating the talent pool down further. Maybe when Darry is fit he finds his way back in, but it would be good to see Lord or whoever the 6th best lock is around the squad too.


One thing I continue to find strange about ABs selection going back many years is that they are obsessed with backs being able to cover multiple positions, but they don’t take advantage of this in any way. The fact that we have 3 players who can play 12, and 3 that can play 13, doesn’t stop them from selecting ALB to cover 12 and 13 giving them 4 options at each position - what is the point of this? Likewise Love, I really like him, especially at 10, But they have Jordan, BB, Dmac who all play 15 at test level, as well as JB who is world class at 15 to cover, so why take up another spot in the squad with yet another 15? Why do we need four options for every position in the backs except 10, which is arguably the most important one where we have not been able to develop a new test player for 8 or 9 years.


And unless there is a big change this year they also don’t use all these utility backs to enable a 6-2 bench split, and will instead pick a specialist winger on the bench to come on and play the last 10 minutes.

62 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ ‘Joe’s generally a step ahead’: How Schmidt’s coaching tree branched into Lions brains trust ‘Joe’s generally a step ahead’: How Schmidt’s coaching tree branched into Lions brains trust
Search