Jones defends snubbing Simmonds brothers despite double success
Eddie Jones today defended his decision to ignore Sam Simmonds, the European player of the year, and brother Joe, who led Exeter Chiefs to the Heineken Champions Cup and Gallagher Premiership double, for the Six Nations squad preparing to face Italy in Rome on Sunday.
A bonus point victory over Italy looks likely to earn England the title and Jones has refused to be swayed in his belief that he can rule Europe again without the Simmonds brothers.
The final day of the delayed Six Nations will see Ireland champions with a bonus point win over France, however, the various scenarios include England taking the title if they beat Italy with a bonus point and France beat Ireland, unless Fabien Galthie’s side earn a bonus-point win and secure a margin of victory two points greater than England's. If England win with a bonus point and Ireland beat France without a bonus point, the title would come down to points difference.
With Courtney Lawes, Jack Nowell. Elliot Daly, George Ford, Joe Marler and Manu Tuilagi ruled out by injury and George Kruis now playing in Japan, Jones needed to bolster a squad denied a warm up game with the Barbarians on Sunday.
However, the Simmonds brothers did not make the squad despite their key roles in winning the double. Jones said he had spoken to the brothers about their absence and added: “At the end of the day it is my judgement call with the coaches having done due diligence and I have done about 8,000 miles watching players live and the decision is this is the best 36 players and there are other players out there who will be massively disappointed.
“It has been a difficult squad to pick and probably different to others because we have nine very good players unavailable and a congested club season which has provided selection challenges because of mis-matches in some of the games. At the end of the day I am happy with the squad and it has a nice balance and 25 per cent of the squad is uncapped.”
Backs: J Cokanasiga (Bath Rugby), O Farrell (Saracens), G Furbank (Northampton Saints), W Heinz (Gloucester Rugby), J Joseph (Bath Rugby), O Lawrence (Worcester Warriors), M Malins (Bristol Bears), J Marchant (Harlequins), J May (Gloucester Rugby), D Robson (Wasps), H Slade (Exeter Chiefs), O Thorley (Gloucester Rugby), J Umaga (Wasps), A Watson (Bath Rugby), B Youngs (Leicester Tigers).
Forwards: T Curry (Sale Sharks), T Dunn (Bath Rugby), B Earl (Bristol Bears), C Ewels (Bath Rugby), E Genge (Leicester Tigers), J George (Saracens), J Hill (Exeter Chiefs), T Hill (Worcester Warriors), M Itoje (Saracens), J Launchbury (Wasps), L Ludlam (Northampton Saints), B Obano (Bath Rugby), D Ribbans (Northampton Saints), J Singleton (Gloucester Rugby), K Sinckler (Bristol Bears), W Stuart (Bath Rugby), S Underhill (Bath Rugby), B Vunipola (Saracens), M Vunipola (Saracens), H Williams (Exeter Chiefs), J Willis (Wasps).
Latest Comments
Agreed. And I don't have much more to say on it, but I had been having one thought that sprang to mind at the tail of this discussion, and that is that it's not all about Razor.
It's not about any coach being "right". I think a lot of selections can become defense and while it doesn't really apply here I really enjoyed that Andy Farrell just gave into the public demands and changed out his team for the change that had been asked for. Like why not? This is the countries team, keep them engaged. The whole reason i've only just finished watching the game was because I wasn't interested in watching any of the selected players against a team like Italy (still actually enjoyed the first half with the contest Italy made of it).
Faz leap frogs a younger half back into start. He hands the golden child the game over July's golden child. He gives an old winger a go, a new flanker and hooker. None of them really did any good, certainly not enough to suggest they should have been promoted above others, but who cares? You won, and you gave the country what they wanted, that's all that matters after all. It's for the country, not the one in charge who thinks they have to have their own pied piper tune playing.
Go to commentsAs Naas would say... A win is a win.
It was not perfect and at times frustrating. All 3 tests were not the best by the Boks and they still found ways to win.
Rassie would have noted the sloppyness at times and silly mistakes. The 9's made amateur handling mistakes when clearing the rucks in all 3 tests.
Once the "stupid" mistakes are eliminated, this Bok team will be very very hard to beat.
Go to comments