Jones provides mixed messages over Farrell injury scare
Eddie Jones did little to clear up an injury scare for Owen Farrell ahead of England's Six Nations match with Scotland, providing mixed messages over the playmaker's availability in a mischievous news conference.
Farrell required treatment from England's physios during a training session on Thursday, having suffered an apparent leg problem.
Yet after initially suggesting the Saracens back was a "doubt" for Scotland's visit to Twickenham, Jones proceeded to change tack while offering a somewhat farcical explanation of how the injury was sustained.
"I think he ran into my dog, mate. My dog was running around and he ran into it," said Jones with a smile, before adding: "Nah, he'll be alright. He'll be alright."
A reporter immediately stated: "But you said he was a doubt", to which Jones replied: "Yeah, but I think he'll be alright, is that ok?"
The England coach later added: "He just ran into someone in training, simple as that. He'll be alright ... possibly."
Asked if England have sufficient cover should Farrell, who was named in the starting XV earlier on Thursday, be unavailable, Jones said: "We've got plenty of back-ups. Ben Te'o can play 12, he's an exceptional player, so there's no risk for us."
Latest Comments
Actually the era defining moment came a few years earlier. February 2002 to be precise, when Michael D Higgins as finance minister at the time introduced his sports persons tax relief bill to the dial. As the politicians of the day stated “It seems to be another daft K Club frolic born in Kildare amongst the well-paid professional jockeys with whom the Minister plays golf” and that the scheme represented “a savage uncaring vision of Ireland and one that should be condemned”. The irfu and Leinster would be nowhere near the position they are in today without this key component of the finances.
Go to commentsIt is crystal clear that people who make such threats on line should be tried and imprisoned. Those with responsibility in social media companies who don’t facilitate this should be convicted. In real life, I have free speech to approach someone like Reinach and verbally threaten him. I am risking a conviction or a slap but I could do it. In the old days, If someone anonymously threatened someone by letter the police would ask and use evidence from the postal system. Unlike the Post, social media companies have complete instant and legal access to the content in social media. They make money from the data, billions. Yet, they turn a blind eye to terrorism, Nazi-ism and industrial levels of threats against individuals including their address and childrens schools being published online all from ananoymous accounts not real speech. They claim free speech. The fault is with the perps but also social media companies who think anonymous personas posting death threats constitutes free speech.
Go to comments