Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

WRU was an 'unforgiving, even vindictive' environment - Key questions answered

By PA
(Photo by Catherine Ivill/Getty Images)

The Welsh Rugby Union has been left reeling by a damning independent review into behaviour at all levels within the organisation.

ADVERTISEMENT

The review, which was launched in February this year, followed a BBC programme that reported allegations of racism, sexism, misogyny and homophobia connected to the governing body.

Here, the PA news agency looks at the issues.

What was the starting point?

A BBC programme aired in January 2023 probed the culture at the WRU and saw a number of its former employees make accusations about their time at the organisation. Charlotte Wathan, general manager of women’s rugby until her resignation in early 2022, claimed offensive comments by a colleague left her in tears and feeling sick, while another unnamed contributor says she was left contemplating suicide by her experiences of bullying and sexism at work. Incidents of racism and homophobia were also alleged.

Related

What was the immediate fall-out?

WRU chief executive Steve Phillips resigned from his post later that month, with former Wales rugby international and Olympic hurdler Nigel Walker taking over the role on an interim basis. The WRU also announced an independent review would be commissioned, and Walker said: “You come up for a compelling argument for change because where we are now is not sustainable. If we are not prepared to change, the future of Welsh rugby and the Welsh Rugby Union is in danger. I can’t put it any more bluntly than that.”

What form did the review panel take and what was its remit?

The panel was chaired by former Court of Appeal judge Dame Anne Rafferty, with ex-England rugby international Maggie Alphonsi and Quentin Smith also appointed. David Lawson acted as counsel to the inquiry. Under its terms of reference, the panel’s role was to investigate allegations of sexism, misogyny, homophobia and racism. The panel’s scope included covering culture of the WRU, actions and behaviour at all levels within the WRU, the extent to which employees felt able to voice concerns or challenge inappropriate and discriminatory language and behaviour, effectiveness of the WRU’s whistleblowing policy procedures and the WRU’s actions in response to individual complaints set out in the BBC Wales programme.

What did the panel discover?

A 134-page report was published on November 14. The report found that the WRU was an “unforgiving, even vindictive” environment to work in for some of its employees, and witnesses interviewed reported feelings of powerlessness and fear, with the review identifying a workplace that “contained elements of bullying and discrimination” and was experienced as “toxic” by some employees. Examples of discrimination reported included the sharing of gossip that a female staff member had “slept her way” into her job, use of the phrase “hello sugar t***” and the use of slurs about women in same-sex relationships.

What has been recommended and what is the WRU’s response?

The panel made 36 recommendations, including a need for more transparency. The WRU was urged to align clearly and publicly with inclusion and diversity, and the report also called for further investment in the women’s and girls’ game, with spending in line with other unions after the review found it was not “properly supported and developed”. The WRU had already committed to ensuring that all of the recommendations are actioned, and WRU chair Richard Collier-Keywood said: “We have let people down. We have to do better and we will.”

Has the WRU already started making changes?

Yes. In June, Collier-Keywood became the WRU’s first independently-appointed chair – previous chairs were elected by the WRU’s member clubs – and the WRU’s first female chief executive Abi Tierney will start work in January. A reformed WRU board will include a combination of appointed and elected directors. Six of the appointed directors have been announced, with four of them being women. Collier-Keywood says that progress has been made on improving employment practices. The WRU’s women’s high-performance programme, meanwhile, has received significant investment, with 32 full-time playing contracts now in place. A wider strategy for women’s and girls’ rugby will be delivered in 2024.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

South Africa v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

France v New Zealand | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

England v Wales | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

Lions Share | Episode 3

Zimbabwe vs Kenya | Rugby Africa Cup Semi Final | Full Match Replay

USA vs Spain | Men's International | Full Match Replay

Portugal vs Ireland | Men's International | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

P
PM 51 minutes ago
Why Henry Pollock's x-factor could earn him a Lions Test start

I have been following Lions tours for the last 30 odd years and I can’t remember one feeling as flat as this one, so your damp squib comment is a fair one.


I think there are a few reasons for this;


1) The opposition isn’t that strong this tour and hasn’t generated the normal excitement and uncertainty for the tests, most people are expecting 0-3 (which has never happened in living memory before).


2) The growing discontent within the fan base at the number of “outside BIL “ born players in the squad is a growing issue. The import issue has reached saturation point with some fans and is a bit negative element to this tour (will improve as nation switching becomes harder).


3) The rugby so far hasn’t been great and the tactics to date are not very exciting. People expected more from Andy Farrell and his Lions team.


4) Lions management have scored some own goals with the selection and subsequent call ups. It should have been the best 44 players from the start of the tour but the recent call ups have been underwhelming and damaged the Lions brand for some fans.


5) This tour would have been better if they merged Australia with Argentina and the Lions played Fiji as a warm up game to give the Pacific Nations a better chance of exposure and glory to grow the game. This is the sort of innovative thinking they need to bring out the magic of the Lions brand and create an exciting experience for all.


What’s become clear is the next tour needs to be an exciting one before people forget how magical a Lions tour can feel and the Lions brand is damaged to the point of questioning why it continues. The writing is on the wall, so lets hope the Lions see it and correct some of the above by the next tour.

102 Go to comments
P
PM 1 hour ago
Why Henry Pollock's x-factor could earn him a Lions Test start

Nick,

I am a long suffering England fan, who has had to endure watching 4 years of dull rugby, poor selections and painful defeats. Steve Borthwick talks about GPS and picks squads by numbers and then we put in a poor performance on the pitch - it’s been a consistent trend.


Something changed in the Six Nations and we totally changed our style (literally overnight) and played some really good footie, which finally felt like positive rugby for a change.


Genge has regained his pore-Covid form and is looking back to his best and is head and shoulders above Porter.


Chessum has had a good year and hasn’t played a poor International game this season.


Tom Curry was outstanding in the 6 Nations but they have been playing him at 6, wheras he is better at 7 and is lethal at the breakdown.


Tom Willis was brought into the starting team at 8 and has been one of the best England players over the last year, who should have been on this Lions tour at 8. Earl had his best game since 2020 last week - not sure 1 game warrants Lions selection over a poor combination side and he is certainly second choice for his club 7 country behind Willis.


Pollock will be a good player but like all young emerging players, he is inconsistent and can go quiet in games, which is why Curry should be the starter at 7. He brings energy to games, which is why he is good from the bench but there is an argument to say he is the 5th best England openside (Curry x2, Underhill & Earl are currently better) but will improve over the next 5 years. We just need to stop the media building him up for a fall, let him play and develop and you will see a sensational Henry Pollock for the Lions in 4 years time.


Lions will be too powerful over 80 mins, so doesn’t really matter who they pick. Just please don’t put too much hype on Pollock. His 20 mins of International rugby going into this tour were positive but the media caused a frenzy and no other player would be selected on this basis.


Let’s enjoy the rugby and give Pollock the space and time he requires.

102 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING New Zealand U20 player ratings vs France | World Rugby U20 Championship New Zealand U20 player ratings vs France | World Rugby U20 Championshi