1
La Rochelle set up another French showdown in Champions Cup quarter-finals
By PA
Ihaia West scored 16 points as La Rochelle booked a Heineken Champions Cup quarter-final showdown with Montpellier after a hard-fought victory over 14-man Bordeaux-Begles.
The fly-half scored a first-half try and kicked four conversions and a penalty as Ronan O’Gara’s much-changed side, who took an 18-point lead into the second leg, triumphed 31-23 against a dogged Bordeaux outfit who fought to the final whistle despite having number eight Maama Vaipulu sent off early on.
A 62-36 aggregate win means Montpellier will travel to the Stade Marcel Deflandre in the last eight.
The visitors took a 3-0 led courtesy of Maxime Lucu’s 15th-minute penalty, but it was soon cancelled out by West after the La Rochelle pack flexed its muscles at the set-piece.
Bordeaux were reduced to 14 with just 27 minutes one when referee Wayne Barnes sent off Vaipulu for a senseless shoulder charge on centre Jonathan Danty, but Lucu restored their advantage with a second kick to give his side a 6-3 half-time lead.
However, West carved his way through the visitors’ defence within two minutes of the restart to touch down for the game’s first try before adding to conversion to make it 10-6, and obliged once again after number eight Greg Alldritt had crossed.
Nineteen-year-old centre Gatien Masse’s converted 53rd-minute try gave the 14 men hope, but it was extinguished almost immediately when Danty powered his way through before putting in scrum-half Tawera Kerr-Barlow.
Replacement Levani Botia claimed La Rochelle’s fourth try with 12 minutes remaining after Mateo Garcia had kicked a third penalty for the visitors as they cruised to victory despite Jules Plisson’s late yellow card and a consolation try from winger Federico Mori.
Trending on RugbyPass
2
Stuart Lancaster 'wants out' of Racing 92 and eyeing Euro giants job
3
Henry Arundell lined up for early England homecoming
4
Government provides bleak assessment on the state of the Premiership
5
Latest Comments
It is if he thinks he’s got hold of the ball and there is at least one other player between him and the ball carrier, which is why he has to reach around and over their heads. Not a deliberate action for me.
Go to commentsI understand, but England 30 years ago were a set piece focused kick heavy team not big on using backs.
Same as now.
South African sides from any period will have a big bunch of forwards smashing it up and a first five booting everything in their own half.
NZ until recently rarely if ever scrummed for penalties; the scrum is to attack from, broken play, not structured is what we’re after.
Same as now.
These are ways of playing very ingrained into the culture.
If you were in an English club team and were off to Fiji for a game against a club team you’d never heard of and had no footage of, how would you prepare?
For a forward dominated grind or would you assume they will throw the ball about because they are Fijian?
A Fiji way. An English way.
An Australian way depends on who you’ve scraped together that hasn’t been picked off by AFL or NRL, and that changes from generation to generation a lot of the time.
Actually, maybe that is their style. In fact, yes they have a style.
Nevermind. Fuggit I’ve typed it all out now.
Go to comments