1
Lam believes Bristol laid down a 'major marker' after comeback win at Exeter
By Online Editors
Pat Lam described Bristol’s stunning victory at Exeter as a “major marker” for the season after his side came back from a 17-0 half-time deficit to win 20-17 at Sandy Park.
Dan Thomas came on as a half-time replacement for the injured Jake Heenan and it was the 26-year-old flanker who was at the centre of a driving maul that crashed over the Chiefs’ line in the last minute to snatch victory for Bristol and take them to the top of the Gallagher Premiership table.
Piers O’Conor scored the Bears’ other try, with Callum Sheedy kicking two penalties and two conversions.
Continue reading below...
Director of rugby Lam said: “This victory is huge in our growth as we didn’t beat Sale or Exeter last year so to beat both was a real learning curve for us and a major marker.
“Exeter are a power-reliant team and they were fully loaded today and to come here is a real mental and physical challenge.
“We didn’t play our best rugby but we were top shelf in terms of attitude and commitment.
“We gave away soft tries in the first half so the message at half-time was to start from scratch, stick to our systems and build the scoreboard.
“We are proud to be top of the league but we are still gutted at throwing three points away at Harlequins.”
Thomas said he was “over the moon” to help his side to the summit of the table but hailed Bristol’s attitude and resilience.
“You have to challenge yourself when you come down here and when we went 17-0 down, our heads didn’t drop,” he said.
“Their points came from our mistakes but our offloading game worked better for us in the second half and we stuck to our systems.
“We were lucky to come out on top but I’m over the moon.”
Exeter had built up a 17-0 lead through tries from Sam Simmonds and Nic White with seven points from the boot of Joe Simmonds, but Chiefs boss Rob Baxter was critical of his side’s second-half performance.
He said: “We didn’t do ourselves justice today as it was just basic sloppiness.
“We made silly mistakes and when the pressure came on as a result of Nic White’s yellow card, we made some really odd decisions.”
Both bosses was asked about their view on Saracens’ fine and deduction of 35 points for breaching the salary cap.
Lam said: “It’s all about having a level playing field and we would do anything like that as we do everything by the book.
“We have one of the richest owners in Steve Lansdown but we won’t consider anything illegal and the rules are very clear about what you can and can’t do.”
Baxter added: “It’s for other people to decide what Saracens’ fate is and we and the other 10 clubs should just focus on themselves.
“Losing today was nothing to do with events off the field.”
The Season with Hamilton Boys High School - Episode 1:
Trending on RugbyPass
2
Wallaroos captain reflects on Black Ferns’ success with sevens stars
3
Springboks flyhalf's latest injury worry
4
Initial Immanuel Feyi-Waboso injury update does not sound promising
5
Latest Comments
In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.
First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.
They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.
Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.
Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.
That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup
Go to commentsBens got a crush on KLA. So cute.
Go to comments