1
Lambie: I will play rugby again
By Christopher Devine
Pat Lambie insists he will play rugby again and has "no plans to retire" after the Sharks provided an update on the South Africa fly-half's health on Thursday.
Lambie endured a lengthy lay-off after being concussed last June and then sustained another blow to the head in a victory over the Kings in May, after which it was revealed he "was waking up feeling hungover in the mornings" and was suffering with sensitivity to light.
In a statement, the Sharks revealed the 26-year-old will spend three to six months being kept away from contact, but it is anticipated he will then return.
Sharks team doctor Alan Kourie said: "We have spent the last six weeks gathering as much information as possible, which is why we have avoided making any unsubstantiated statements in the press.
"Pat has been referred to two independent specialists [concussion and neurologist] and we have also sought the opinion of a UK-based specialist, who has dealt with over 1,500 cases of concussion. With clear results of both an MRI and an EEG [electroencephalogram] all three doctors, including myself, are of the opinion that a period of 3-6 months without contact is necessary.
"This decision has been taken to give Pat a chance to fully recover from his symptoms, after which we have no objection to him playing again."
Lambie, who has earned 56 caps for the Springboks, said: "I have been exercising for 30-40 minutes a day for the last month and I started to run again last week. I also have a thorough eye and neck rehab schedule, which I am following on a daily basis at the Sharks. None of the exercise has made my symptoms worse and in fact, I feel my best whilst active.
"I will be playing rugby again and I certainly have no plans to retire. My focus for now is purely on making a full recovery and getting fit and strong again. Once the three-month rest period has been completed, I will be reassessed to determine where we are in terms of the rugby calendar for the rest of the 2017 season.
"I would like to thank both the Cell C Sharks and SA Rugby for their patience and concern for me. I have been cared for and looked after extremely well and I am grateful for their constant support. The fact that both parties have not put any pressure on me to get back on the field, until I fully recover, makes the world of difference with my recovery."
Trending on RugbyPass
2
Jake White: Ireland, Australia and Wales have the same problem
3
David Campese names his Springbok world player of the year winner
4
Let's be real about these All Blacks
5
Latest Comments
Agreed. Borthwick will have to write a new excuse book soon .
I have looked at the two world cup final teams from 2003 and 2020.
2003 team scored 187 tries between them in 389 caps
2020 team scored 113 tries between them in 473 caps. As you can see a huge disparity in scoring rate. Only Johnny May with 36 tries in 78 caps scored a higher amount of tries. Elliot Daly comes close but the rest are frankly very poor.
Farrell and Ford scored a pathetic 20 tries between them in a combined 210 caps.
There again , the 2003 team did have Wilko and Greenwood etc whereas 2020 team had Ford and Farrell .
So much people saying that Fords strength is of bringing others into the game .
Really. The figures totally disprove that notion .
It has been mentioned elsewhere that we have accepted mediocrity far too often and the figures would indicate that players are or have been picked far too often without performing .
Go to commentsNot disputing that NZ are ahead of Eng. Also not saying Eng are unlucky (though clearly the tone of the article is not that the ABs were unlucky but that they 'should have' won). Your team are looking great and are on the up. I just felt that Pundits have argued Eng 'should have' won the first test against the ABs, when it's more nuanced than that, and very fine margins determine results that Eng didn't get right. Same applies, therefore, to NZ and other nations. Ben Smith though doesn't seem to see it that way. To be clear: I'm not saying I agree with the 'should haves', but more that I take issue with the phrasing.
Good to see your respect for other nations is so strong! Proper rugby fan you are!!!
Go to comments