Richie McCaw's law change suggestion proves popular with fans
An interview with two-time World Cup-winning captain Richie McCaw was recently shared on the Rugby World Cup’s social media pages where he answered questions from fans.
These included revealing the best player he came up against in his career, Geoge Smith, to what he thought of Faf de Klerk’s hair. However, he was also asked what changes he would make to rugby currently - and he responded by suggesting the clock should be stopped for scrums.
The legendary flanker said that “a scrum can eat up a lot of time in the game” so stopping the clock until the ball is fed would alleviate such a problem.
This suggestion has proven to be popular among fans, as this has been an area of concern for many over the years.
All too frequently reset scrums can consume a huge amount of time on a clock and while there have been many law changes to make scrums less susceptible to collapse, there is still room for improvement.
(Continue reading below...)
Perhaps the most agonising part of the game is when a scrum is awarded in the final few minutes of a match, as it often ends the contest prematurely with the ball never escaping after a series of interventions from the referee.
McCaw’s amendment is not without its criticism, however, as some feel that this would lengthen games considerably. While there would obviously be more ball in play time, it is not inconceivable to say that matches would be 20 minutes or longer. On wetter days where errors are more likely, this could rise even more.
Of course, this is not a foolproof idea by McCaw, as he was ultimately only given a short period of time to think of an answer. But he has nonetheless raised an issue that concerns a vast number of rugby fans, and something that many want to see addressed.
WATCH: Follow every game in the Guinness PRO14 and Gallagher Premiership live in the RugbyPass Match Centre, with live scores, stats, commentary and more including HD streaming in some parts of the world
Latest Comments
Apart from the scrum a really sloppy AB performance. Through successive coaching regimes they just don't seem to be able to cope with motivated and physically aggressive opposition, getting knocked off the ball and scrambling around with back foot ball. A lack of proper 10 means we are then not turning the opposition around and pinning them in their corners.
Go to commentsSheesh Goldie, South Africa actually lost two tests, IRE & ARG. Everyone got beaten at least twice this year so I'm not sure why the Boks are the "standard". I'd hate the ABs to follow their example. Our standard should be ABs (version 2015).
But I agree, the ABs are definitely in the B range. For me, it's a B+, the + mainly reflecting the lifting of the teams baseline from wobbly to now comfortably being able to win ugly.
Bring on 2025.
Go to comments