Rebels hand out hefty fines to Mafi and Timani over late night fracas

Amanaki Mafi and Lopeti Timani have been fined the maximum amount by their club Melbourne Rebels after their late night incident in Dunedin over the weekend.
Both players will have to pay AUS$15,000 for breaking the Super Rugby club's disciplinary protocols.
Melbourne Rebels loose forward Mafi appeared in Dunedin District Court on Monday after he was charged for injuring with intent to injure, which carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison.
The alleged attack - on Rebels teammate Timani - happened in Dunedin and came after the Rebels lost 43-37 to the Highlanders on Saturday and were bounced from the playoffs.
Mafi entered no plea and was granted bail. He will reportedly return to Melbourne this week.
The terms of his bail mean he cannot associate with teammate Timani.
His case has been scheduled to return to court on August 3rd, but he won’t have to appear in person.
Rugby Australia and the Rebels confirmed in a statement Sunday night that Japanese international Mafi had been involved in an incident with Timani. It is understood no other players were involved.
New Zealand Police released a statement following the incident, and said the victim had received moderate injuries but did not need require hosptialisation.
Melbourne Rebels CEO Baden Stephenson expressed his disappointment in a statement Sunday night.
“I am bitterly disappointed that an incident has occurred at the end of a season where we have taken pride in our on and off field behaviour," the statement read.
“We will respect the process and won’t be making further comments until all investigations have taken place.”
Both Mafi and Timani are off contract after this season. Timani is set to head to France and join Top 14 side La Rochelle next season, while Japanese international Mafi has been linked with a move to the Sunwolves.
Latest Comments
You are right about win rates, but its hard to argue that him playing at 8 was in any way related to England’s poor performances. He was consistently one of England’s best players when playing 8.
And like I said, he has only ever performed well at 7 in international rugby when there has been a specialist openside elsewhere in the back row who is able to share the defensive workload. If you’re going to lock in to only ever selecting Tom Curry at 6 then there’s no issues at all. But if there’s a chance that one day CCS, or Ted Hill, or Chessum, or Kpoku, or Carnduff might play 6, then a backrow with Earl at 7 would be extremely unbalanced.
I don’t have a pension fund. I am relaxed, but I’m that my tone offended you - it really wasn’t deliberate!
Go to comments2 tests, that’s insane. How can you develop the next generation of internationals with 2 tests? 4 would have been more beneficial, and provide a good test for the squad, with an emerging Ireland tour running concurrently to widen the player base at test level, surely. There are to many players in Ireland not getting enough meaningful game time as it is. Scotland did it right last summer, Ireland could have done something similar. Opportunity missed.
Go to comments