Michael Hooper: 'The fire in the belly hasn't been extinguished at all'
Michael Hooper may have endured one of the more deflating afternoons of his storied career with the luckless loss to Scotland at Murrayfield, but he's adamant the fire in Wallabies' bellies rages hotter as they march on to Twickenham.
Captain Australia had led from the front, as ever, but it wasn't Hooper's day as he saw what would have been the 23rd try of his international career controversially ruled out en route to an underwhelming 15-13 defeat.
Yet self-pity has never been in his playbook. As he and coach Dave Rennie sift through the casualty list from Monday morning's (AEDT) ding-dong, Hooper was quick to sound the battle cry for the biggest examination of their tour against Eddie Jones' England.
"The fire in the belly hasn't been extinguished at all," declared Hooper.
"I guess after that defeat, it's just been raised."
Naturally, he needs no reminding the Wallabies have lost seven straight times to England since a certain wily Australian coach took their reins. Hooper's played in all seven!
Yet even while critics like former All Black-turned-pundit Andrew Mehrtens have been musing that an eighth-straight defeat could be an ugly one for Australia if they play as they did against Scotland, Hooper remains relentlessly positive.
"The record (against England) hasn't been great, but a lot of these guys haven't played up here (in the Northern Hemisphere), haven't been part of those games, so they don't feel that sort of stuff," he said.
"It's a new team, and it's a great challenge for us next week to roll into England.
"That's been a setback today. The motivation was about going really well and continuing the momentum we've built over the last year but we roll now to a six-day turnaround against the English."
It's not ideal, especially with England having had a further day to rest after their 11-try romp against outclassed Tonga while Rennie has big injury concerns over Jordan Petaia (hamstring) and Taniela Tupou, who'll have to undergo concussion protocols.
Does the idea that Hooper's side don't carry any baggage or scars from those seven defeats to 'Eddie's England' carry any weight?
Certainly, there were things to be admired in what fullback Andrew Kellaway described not inaccurately as a "clunky" performance.
Like replacement Izaia Perese's rumbustious performance that helped set up their only try from Rob Leota and the powerful second-row combination between Rory Arnold and Izack Rodda. Not to mention the indefatigable Hooper himself.
"The positive is that it was narrow and close (against Scotland). Discipline is what really kills us because it's nobody's fault but our own," said Kellaway, whose first outing at 15 was also impressive.
"If we tidy up the breakdown, and that stuff, we'll put ourselves in a position to win the England game hopefully."
And they will continue to take their lead from a man whose fire never goes out.
Hooper's impassioned debate with referee Romain Poite following the game's key moment, demonstrated exactly that.
The charming French official, in his last test after 15 years of having his ear bent, had ruled out Hooper's first-half try and instead binned Allan Alaalatoa for a dangerous clear-out, prompting the captain to implore: "You're the ref ... he didn't do anything!"
Poite invited Hooper to come and talk to him about it after the match. Presumably, it's a lot easier once you've retired!
Latest Comments
It is if he thinks he’s got hold of the ball and there is at least one other player between him and the ball carrier, which is why he has to reach around and over their heads. Not a deliberate action for me.
Go to commentsI understand, but England 30 years ago were a set piece focused kick heavy team not big on using backs.
Same as now.
South African sides from any period will have a big bunch of forwards smashing it up and a first five booting everything in their own half.
NZ until recently rarely if ever scrummed for penalties; the scrum is to attack from, broken play, not structured is what we’re after.
Same as now.
These are ways of playing very ingrained into the culture.
If you were in an English club team and were off to Fiji for a game against a club team you’d never heard of and had no footage of, how would you prepare?
For a forward dominated grind or would you assume they will throw the ball about because they are Fijian?
A Fiji way. An English way.
An Australian way depends on who you’ve scraped together that hasn’t been picked off by AFL or NRL, and that changes from generation to generation a lot of the time.
Actually, maybe that is their style. In fact, yes they have a style.
Nevermind. Fuggit I’ve typed it all out now.
Go to comments