Mike Brown currently on trial at a Premiership club - report
Ex-England full-back Mike Brown is reportedly on trial at a Gallagher Premiership club ten months after playing his last game in the league. It was March 2022 when the now 37-year-old made his last appearance for Newcastle. He has since been in rugby limbo, his only action coming during the Barbarians’ three-game English club tour in November versus Harlequins, Bath and Northampton.
However, having recently contested the RPA general secretary position that was eventually taken by Christian Day, it has now emerged that Brown is now angling for a return to playing as it is believed he has been training at Leicester, the defending Premiership champions.
A UK media report on Wednesday read: “Sportsmail has learned that Brown is training with the Tigers, who are soon to be light on full-backs due to Freddie Steward’s selection for England and Freddie Burns’ impending move to Highlanders next month.
“Richard Wigglesworth stepped up last month to succeed Steve Borthwick and retired from playing, but he took over a squad with a number of injuries. There are also seven Tigers - including first-choice full-back Steward - in England's squad preparing for the Six Nations.
“Wigglesworth will also see Burns, the drop goal hero from last season's Premiership final win over Saracens, move to New Zealand next month for a stint with the Highlanders. It means that without Steward and Burns, Leicester are light at full-back which is Brown's favoured position.
“Brown would undoubtedly provide Wigglesworth with a great deal of experience and despite not playing professional rugby this season, he has been keeping himself in good physical condition. The short-term trial agreement allows Leicester and interim coach Wigglesworth to cast their eye over Brown before making any decision on a possible longer deal.”
It was last October when Brown, a distinguished decade-and-a-half servant with Harlequins, spoke at length with RugbyPass about being left on the shelf for the start of the 2022/23 season after his one-year stay at Newcastle fizzled out. He had been linked with numerous clubs during the off-season but he revealed there was no truth in any.
“No, none at all,” he replied when asked if there genuinely was truth in any of the speculation that he was off here, there and everywhere. “There was a period of about four weeks where I was linked to some teams as ridiculous as Saracens. I mean, they would never have picked me up. One because of my stint with Quins and two because they don’t need me.
“There was Sarries, there was Sale, there was Worcester at one point before what happened, happened [the club’s financial collapse], other people like that, and then it was Agen, but I literally haven’t spoken to anyone. None of them are true, unfortunately. I’m still waiting if one comes but it’s more working towards my transition and then whichever opportunity comes first, if it fits then that is what I will take.”
Regarding his unplanned layoff, he added: “Everyone goes through it at some point in their lives, whether it is straight after uni or later on in their life or they change any job, any industry. That is just what I’m going through at the moment, but I do believe if you keep working hard opportunities will come.
“So even when I have those low, uncertain moments I keep going back to what I did in my rugby career, investing in it and working hard at it and then the opportunities came. I believe it will be the same with my transition.”
Latest Comments
Yeah I actually think it was Havili that took it off him. Not bad himself, but on the advice of Razor, who didn't even pursue it and use Havili on a split bench as 10 cover?
One huge cluster#$@% but I think you could be right, I liked O'Connor when he won at the Reds and I've just got a funny feeling he's going to dominate Super Rugby, kinda like how Cooper came back to the Wallabies as an experienced head and spat out South Africa. I think James could do the same with the Blues and other Aus sides. I'd really love Rivez to get a lot of minutes though.
Go to commentsI rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.
He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.
The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).
The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.
The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).
It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.
Go to comments