More than one Pacific side vying for inclusion in Super Rugby replacement
Until now, the former All Blacks-funded Kanaloa Hawaii venture has attracted all the attention as the sole known Pasifika side set to be considered for inclusion in next year's Super Rugby replacement. Reports out of New Zealand suggest that another side Pacific heritage team has also expressed interest in joining an NZ competition, however.
As the war of words rages on between New Zealand Rugby and Rugby Australia, the chances of the two nations teaming up to create a new competition to take the place of Super Rugby seem less and less likely by the day. Both unions have expressed interest in including a Pacific Island team alongside their local sides, however, with a tug-of-wear appearing to break out over Kanaloa Hawaii.
According to the New Zealand Herald, however, a second Auckland-based side have also put in a bid to play alongside the likes of the Blues and the Crusaders - and some heavyweights of the game are putting their weight behind the proposal.
The Herald has suggested that during the process of trying to arrange a match between the All Blacks and a Pacific XV, a potential long-term option has also arisen, which would see a Pacific side join the Kiwi franchises in a proposed 8-10 team competition.
The New Zealand Rugby Players Association (NZRPA) is allegedly facilitating discussions between the team of stakeholders interested in setting up a Pacific franchise in NZ, including the likes of former All Blacks Eroni Clarke and Michael Jones.
NZRPA boss Rob Nichol confirmed the option was currently being discussed but declined to give any further details.
While the venture run by the Kanaloa Hawaii consortium would likely operate independently but still be governed by the NZR's tournament rules, this rumoured franchise would be more closely tied to New Zealand Rugby.
Eroni Clarke was recently appointed NZR's first-ever Pasifika engagement manager and has previously spoken about his desire to improve Pacific representation throughout the game.
"We've long had a desire to have a Pacific-led team in Super Rugby," he told the Herald prior to the latest revelations. "The wonderful thing is we are drawing closer to the dream coming to fruition.
"It really does put a stake in the ground for Pacific people. It aligns with a lot of where New Zealand Rugby is but also global rugby and the recognition of Pacific contribution to the game.
"We're much closer to it now than we've ever been before. It would open doors, provide opportunities, for the aspirations of the Pacific community to normalise areas that we haven't been prevalent in before. It's a wonderful opportunity."
While discussions between NZR and RA have stalled due ostensibly to the Australian board's perception that their NZ equivalents have shown them minimal respect during the negotiation period, there are still hopes that a trans-Tasman competition could emerge from the rubble of Super Rugby.
NZR have effectively signalled that they would be willing to consider including up to four Australia sides in their proposed competition - but fewer would be more desirable. RA, on the other hand, are set on all five of their sides being maintained for the future.
Latest Comments
Nah, that just needs some more variation. Chip kicks, grubber stabs, all those. Will Jordan showed a pretty good reason why the rush was bad for his link up with BB.
If you have an overlap on a rush defense, they naturally cover out and out and leave a huge gap near the ruck.
It also helps if both teams play the same rules. ARs set the offside line 1m past where the last mans feet were😅
Go to commentsYeah nar, should work for sure. I was just asking why would you do it that way?
It could be achieved by outsourcing all your IP and players to New Zealand, Japan, and America, with a big Super competition between those countries raking it in with all of Australia's best talent to help them at a club level. When there is enough of a following and players coming through internally, and from other international countries (starting out like Australia/without a pro scene), for these high profile clubs to compete without a heavy australian base, then RA could use all the money they'd saved over the decades to turn things around at home and fund 4 super sides of their own that would be good enough to compete.
That sounds like a great model to reset the game in Aus. Take a couple of decades to invest in youth and community networks before trying to become professional again. I just suggest most aussies would be a bit more optimistic they can make it work without the two decades without any pro club rugby bit.
Go to comments