1
Multiple Premiership clubs ask supporters not to request ticket refunds
By Online Editors
Multiple Premiership clubs have created schemes that will allow supporters to donate the remaining credits on their season tickets and unused individual match tickets to help their teams through the financial crisis caused by the coronavirus pandemic.
It was May 21 when Worcester unveiled their 2019/20 ticket reimbursement contingency plan which gave supporters three options - the ability to donate their refund amount to the club, the transfer of the rebate to an account enabling them to purchase tickets, food, drink and merchandise when Sixways reopens, or a straightforward refund of the existing credit.
Harlequins followed suit on June 4 regarding their e-cash system, allowing supporters to “kindly donate some/all of your remaining balance to support the club through the impact of Covid-19”. Supporters could also use existing credit to go towards 2020/21 season ticket membership renewal, or request a refund.
Now three more Gallagher Premiership clubs have joined in with similar appeals, Leicester, Gloucester and Wasps allowing fans the option to donate the remainder of their 2019/20 season credit to them to help offset the financial losses caused by the pandemic.
Leicester have told their supporters if they choose to donate, “your investment will remain with the club and be used to support the rugby programme, including recruitment and retention of the playing squad under Geordan Murphy and new head coach Steve Borthwick, and in resourcing the successful academy set-up”.
Gloucester, meanwhile, explained to their supporters that if they chose to donate reminding credit, “your investment will remain with the club and will go towards our new training facility, full details of which will be revealed shortly. “Your contribution to this exciting project will be recognised in a special commemorative area within the new facility where all the names of those who donated will be displayed.
“Everyone who takes this option will receive an exclusive invitation to the opening of our new training facility (scheduled for next summer) when you will be able to see your name on display as well as being among the first to tour the new facilities.”
Wasps have suspended the launch of their 2020/21 season memberships sales “in light of the uncertainty surrounding live events due to coronavirus”. They too are accepting credit donations that will go “back to the club, to support Wasps through this very challenging time”.
Premiership clubs have come under huge financial pressures due to the stoppage of the season in March. The latest collective measures by the clubs have been an agreement to reduce the player salary cap for season 2021/22 and the reduction of the marquee player quota for 2022/23.
Trending on RugbyPass
2
Jake White: Ireland, Australia and Wales have the same problem
3
David Campese names his Springbok world player of the year winner
4
Let's be real about these All Blacks
5
Latest Comments
GB is England, Scotland, Wales. They are the 3 constituent countries in Great Britain. Ergo playing only those three countries is a tour of GB. The difference between GB and the UK is Northern Ireland. It's not a huge deal to be accurate and call places by their correct name. But please refrain from your idiotic attempts to BS that GB=UK. It doesn't.
Go to commentsThe 2023 draw was only criticized when it became apparent that the top 5 sides in the world were on the same side of the draw. Nowhere did they discuss the decision to backtrack to 2019 rankings which ensured that England and Wales (ranked #12 in 2023) were ranked top4.
The parties who trashed out the schedule were England Rugby, NZ Rugby and ITV. It is bordering on corrupt that a Rugby nation has the power to schedule its opponents to play a major match the week before facing them in a QF.
You won't find commentary by members of the relevant committees because a committee did not make the scheduling decision. I have never heard members of World Rugby speak out on the draw or scheduling issues.
For example in 2015 Japan were hammered by Scotland 4 days after beating SA. The criticism only happens after a cock up.
A fair pool schedule is pretty straightforward: The lowest two tanked teams must play on last pool day but not against each other. That means that TV can focus on promoting big matches with a Tier2 involved for that Friday.
Why does NZ Always get its preferred slot playing the hardest pool match on day 1?
Why do other teams eg France, Ireland, Scotland get so often scheduled to play a hard match the week before the QFs?
If you believe the rules around scheduling are transparent then please point me in the right direction?
Go to comments