Why South Africa hosting WXV2 is a step forward on National Women's Day
South African rugby fans woke up this morning with questions burning and percolating in the back of their minds. Can the Springboks defend their World Cup crown with only one recognisable fly-half? Is there such a thing as too many scrum-halves? And can a captain still add value if he doesn’t take the field?
But rugby is only a game. One that unites millions across the land but can’t claim to be truly ubiquitous. What is really uniting the 60 million people of the country together this morning is a day in honour of the 20,000 women who marched on the union buildings in Pretoria on 9 August 1956 to protest the unjust laws of the apartheid regime.
National Women’s Day in South Africa was first officially celebrated in 1995. That was a heady year for the country. A few months earlier Francois Pienaar collected the Webb Ellis Cup from president Nelson Mandela, who swept to power the year before in the country’s first free election on a wave of hope and optimism.
Women’s rugby was not even an afterthought at the time. The fascistic government of the past perpetuated the idea that a woman’s place was in the kitchen or on the birthing bed. But the new government promised to change the collective views of its citizenry.
This has proved to be another broken vow of the ruling African National Congress. According to recent research, between 25% and 40% of South African women have experienced sexual and or physical violence from their partner. The rate at which women are killed by an intimate partner in the country is five times higher than the global average. There are around 115 reported rapes a day.
According to Rinkette Steenkamp, who won a gold medal in the 100m hurdles at the 2014 African Championships, a number of factors inhibit the development of women’s sport.
In an illuminating and sweeping paper published by the University of Pretoria titled, ‘An exploration of there factors contributing to gender inequality in athletics participation and leadership’, Steenkamp unearths a plethora of problems:
“Women have been hindered in terms of access to sports participation in all different spheres of sport and the dominance of men in sport leadership positions is nothing new. The literature review indicates underlying factors such as gender stereotyping, socio-cultural expectations (and traditions), lack of media coverage, limited access to participation, limited education programmes and other initiatives.”
When Rugbypass spoke to several South African women rugby players, coaches and commentators last year during the World Cup in New Zealand, a common throughline was revealed.
“People told me my whole life that rugby is not for girls,” said the Springboks centre Sesethu Mtshazi. “There are a lot of obstacles that we need to overcome,” added high performance manager Lynne Cantwell. “South Africa is a deeply patriarchal society,” explained Elma Smit, a highly respected journalist and commentator who was recently told to “stick to netball” by a man on X (formerly Twitter) who defended his comment and failed to see his misogyny.
But the wheels are turning and there is reason to believe that the worst is behind us. The investment by the Blue Bulls in Pretoria into a fully professional women’s programme - the first in the country - is paying dividends. The Bulls Daisies currently top the Women’s Premier Division table with 11 wins from as many matches. They’re 18 points clear of the chasing pack with a positive points difference of 546. Western Province in second place have a points difference of 44.
“When I go to braais [barbecues] my cousins and uncles come up to me and want to talk rugby,” said Springboks and Daisies scrumhalf Rumandi Potgieter. “That’s something I didn’t expect when I started playing. When I first picked up a ball people would ask if I knew the rules and even if I knew how to pass properly. Now they boast that they know a Springbok and I’m the centre of attention at weddings and birthdays.”
Young girls and women can’t be what they can’t see and the lack of female rugby players in the country on TV and social media has hamstrung the development of the game. Which is why a new tournament scheduled for launch in Cape Town in October could further bolster a brand that has been on an upward trajectory since the World Cup.
The inaugural WXV competition run by World Rugby will see 18 nations compete across three groups. Joining South Africa in WXV 2 will be previous world champions the United States of America, Six Nations outfits Italy and Scotland, as well as Japan and Samoa.
“It’s massive for the women’s game and we can only commend World Rugby for designing and funding the competition,” Cantwell said. “I have no doubt that it is going to drive the standard of the game. We would love to market the women’s game as wide as possible and by having it on our doorstep, we can reach out to many potential fans and players by bringing the game to them.”
Recent evidence shows that there is an appetite for women’s sport in South Africa. The Netball World Cup, also hosted in Cape Town, saw large crowds attend a minority sport. The national cricket team reached last year’s T20 World Cup final while the national football side advanced to the next round of their World Cup last week. Both achievements eclipsed anything their male counterparts have accomplished. There is talent in the country. There is no telling what it could realise if it were matched by adequate investment and support.
The WXV is simply the start. Strong performances against higher ranked opposition could galvanise a rugby-hungry public and morph a largely anonymous squad into instantly recognisable figures. And as South Africa advance up World Rugby's rankings from their current position of 12th, perhaps a title at world glory could be a realistic ambition in generations to come.
If all goes according to plan Springboks fans will wake up one morning and wonder if the national women’s side has made a mistake by selecting one too many scrum-halves or one too few hookers.
These same fans might quibble over selections and bemoan the absence of their favourite loose forward. None of this will solve the myriad challenges facing women in the country, but it would help recalibrate the social dynamics in a land that rightly and proudly celebrates National Women’s Day.
Latest Comments
Yeah nar I pretty much agree with that sentiment, wasn't just about the lineout though.
Yeah, I think it's the future of SR, even TRC. Graham above just now posting about how good a night it was with a dbl header of ENGvSA and NZvFrance, and now I don't want to kick SA or Argentina out of TRC but it would be great if in this next of the woods 2 more top teams could come in to create more of these sort of nights (for rugby's appeal). Often Arg and SA and both travel here and you get those games but more often doesn't work out right.
Obviously a long way off but USA and Japan are the obvious two. First thing we need to do is get Eddie Jones kicked out of Japan so they can start improving again and then get a couple of US teams in SRP (even if one its just a US based and augmented Jaguares).
It will start off the whole conferences are crap debate again (which I will continue to argue vehemently against), but imagine a 6 team Pacific conference, Tokyo Sunwolves (drafted from Tokyo JRLO teams), Tokyo All Stars (made up of best remaining foreign players and overseas drafts), ALL Nihon (best of local non Tokyo based talent, inc China/Korea etc, with mainland Japan), a could of West Coast american franchises and perhaps a second self PI driven Hawai'i based team, or Jagaures. So I see a short NFL like 3 or 4 month comp as fitting best, maybe not even a full round, NZvAUSvPAC, all games taking place within a 6hr window. Model for NZ will definitely still require a competitive and funded NPC!
On the Crusaders, I liked last years ending with Grace on the bench (ovbiously form dependent but thats how it ended) and Lio-Willie at 8. I could have Blackadder trying to be a 7 but think balance will be used with him at 6 and Kellow as 7. Scott Barrett is an international 6 sized player. It is just NZ style/model that pushes him into the tight, I reckon he'd be a great loose player, and saders have Strange and Cahill as bigger players (plus that change could draw someone like Darry back). Same with Haig now, hes not grown yet but Barrett hight and been playing 6, now that the Highlanders have only chosen two locks he'll be playing lock, and that is going to change his growth trajectory massively, rather than seeing him grow like an International 6.
Go to commentsDan Carter is the leading points scorer and leading points per game person for a player with significant tests. 2s RWC winner and member of the games greatest ever team. It's not even close. The only question of GOAT for rugby is whether McCaw deserves it given Carter's numbers.
Go to comments