New 'Global Rapid Rugby' tournament given green-light by World Rugby
A new club competition, coined Global Rapid Rugby (GRR), has been given the preliminary green-light by World Rugby and is set to debut in February.
The competition, which has been founded by Australian billionaire Andrew Forrest, is set to feature eight teams based in the Asia Pacific region and has been born out of the 'World Series Rugby' tournament, which ran this year.
World Series Rugby saw Western Force, who Forrest owns and who were cut from Super Rugby last year, taking on the 'A' teams of Fiji, Samoa and Tonga, as well as a representative side from Hong Kong, and club sides the Melbourne, Rebels, Crusaders and Panasonic Wild Knights.
Instead of being an exhibition tour for the Force, GRR will be a standalone competition, boasting a $1 million top prize and some interesting law changes, such as reducing the games to 70 minutes in duration, and parcelling it into 90-minute broadcasts. Forrest is hopeful that these tweaks to the laws, such as denying teams the option to kick out on the full from within the 22, will improve ball-in-play times to close to 55%, with a new, more entertaining product the key unique selling point of the fledgling competition.
The tournament will be administered by the Hong Kong Rugby Union and is set to take place over 14 rounds, with 56 games and four finals.
The mining magnate has also been outspoken on his desire to lure some of the world's top players to the competition, stating that GRR is intent on recruiting 20 of the top 100 players in the world and then distributing them among the participating teams, depending on each team's personnel needs.
Those teams will include the Western Force and then one side from each of Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, Fiji and Samoa, as well as two planned teams from Japan, one of which will be provided by the union and the other by a private consortium.
Should the competition prove to be a success, Forrest is already considering expansion plans in China, India, Sri Lanka, the UAE and South Korea.
Latest Comments
I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.
Go to commentsYeah, and ours is waaay bigger than yours. Just as you's get a semi…oh hold on that never happens
Go to comments