New results from Kiwi player poll reveals New Zealand's 'biggest grub', best and worst Super Rugby referees
New results from an anonymous poll conducted among current New Zealand Super Rugby stars has revealed who the majority of players believe the "biggest grub" in the country is.
A 40-question survey conducted by NZME's Sam Casey has offered an insight into the real opinions held by New Zealand’s Super Rugby players - from established All Blacks to professional rookies - about the state of the game nationwide.
Casey said he surveyed “over 100 players” from New Zealand's five Super Rugby franchises, with the release of initial results on Monday causing a stir following the revelation that almost half of the poll's participants disagreed with New Zealand Rugby's decision to appoint Ian Foster as All Blacks head coach.
46 percent of pollers, which included at least 15 players from each Super Rugby club, said they weren't happy with Foster's appointment.
Only 28 percent of players supported NZR's decision to promote Foster from his position as Steve Hansen's assistant, while a further 26 percent said they were “happy with Ian Foster but not the assistant coaches”.
With the results of 10 questions from the poll to be released each day this week, other interesting revelations found from Monday saw Beauden Barrett voted the best player in New Zealand with the backing of 40 percent of the nation's players.
Barrett was also overwhelmingly voted the best first-five in the country with 58 percent of the vote, while Anton Lienert-Brown (66 percent), George Bridge (46 percent) and Damian McKenzie (47 percent) were regarded as New Zealand's top midfielder, wing and fullback, respectively, by their peers.
Arguably the biggest talking point in the release of a further 10 results from the poll on Tuesday was that 44 percent of players voted Dane Coles as the "biggest grub" in the New Zealand game.
Brodie Retallick sat in a distant second with only 15 percent of the votes, while Jordie Barrett wasn't far behind him with 13 percent of players voting for him.
Another intriguing aspect of Tuesday's findings was that Australian official Angus Gardner was picked as the best referee in Super Rugby, receiving almost half of the players' votes with 47 percent of the participants' backing.
On the flip side of the equation, recently-retired referee Glen Jackson received 48 percent of the vote in the running for Super Rugby's worst official.
Latest Comments
I was introduced to crypto investment by an investor I met on Telegram. I liked the program and decided to join the investment platform. At the beginning, I invested and made profits which I continued doing until the website disappeared. I could not withdraw any funds before the incident happened but luckily a friend of mine that works with FBI introduced me to ( WALLET CONNECT (AT) USA (.) C O M) WhatsApp +(1 (412) 225‑ 5918 ) and they came just in time and assisted me to recover all the money. They did a great job and they were very professional to work with. It's quite unbelievable but it happened. We got our money back through their system assistance.
Go to commentsYes that’s what WR needs to look at. Football had the same problem with european powerhouses getting all the latin talent then you’re gaurenteed to get the odd late bloomer (21/22 etc, all the best footballers can play for the country much younger to get locked) star changing his allegiance.
They used youth rep selection for locking national elifibilty at one point etc. Then later only counted residency after the age of 18 (make clubs/nations like in this case wait even longer).
That’s what I’m talking about, not changing allegiance in rugby (were it can only be captured by the senior side), where it is still the senior side. Oh yeah, good point about CJ, so in most cases we probably want kids to be able to switch allegiance, were say someone like Lemoto could rep Tonga (if he wasn’t so good) but still play for Australia’s seniors, while in someone like Kite’s (the last aussie kid to go to France) case he’ll be French qualified via 5 years residency at the age of 21, so France to lock him up before Aussie even get a chance to select him. But if we use footballs regulations, who I’m suggesting WR need to get their a into g replicating, he would only start his 5 years once he turns 18 or whatever, meaning 23 yo is as soon as anyone can switch, and when if they’re good enough teams like NZ and Aus can select them (France don’t give a f, they select anybody just to lock them).
Go to comments