1
New World Rugby backed MLR club to boost USA's World Cup competitiveness
By Ian Cameron
USA Rugby, Major League Rugby (MLR), and World Rugby have announced the establishment of a new MLR expansion club, Anthem Rugby Carolina (RC), based in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Set to join the MLR in the 2024 season, Anthem RC will play its matches at the American Legion Memorial Stadium, marking a significant step in the development of rugby in the United States.
The collaboration between the key governing bodies of global and American rugby, along with North America's leading professional rugby league, is a robust investment aimed at nurturing the sport in the US ahead of the country's hosting of the men's and women's Rugby World Cups in 2031 and 2033, respectively. The US Eagles failed to qualify for Rugby World Cup 2023, just the second time they didn't make the flagship tournament.
The addition of Anthem RC is a timely leg-up for the league which suffered the withdrawal of the Toronto Arrows and the New York Ironworkers in the lead-up to the season due to financial difficulties.
Anthem RC is an evolution of MLR and USA Rugby's existing partnership, which includes the USA Hawks program. This initiative has been instrumental in developing young American and USA-qualified rugby talents. The aim is for Anthem RC to accelerate these efforts, with a particular focus on the USA men's national team's long-term progress and preparation for the Rugby World Cup 2027 and their eventual hosting duties in 2031.
"The launch of Anthem RC is a transformative step in our joint efforts to expand rugby in the US, offering a coherent path for player development and bolstering USA Rugby’s prospects as we approach the Rugby World Cup," said MLR CEO Nic Benson.
Ross Young, CEO of USA Rugby, emphasized the collaboration's significance. "This extraordinary partnership signifies a new trajectory for rugby in America. Anthem RC not only accelerates player development but also strengthens MLR as a pivotal pathway for the USA Men’s Eagles."
World Rugby Chief Executive Alan Gilpin viewed the announcement as a critical component of a broader strategy to enhance rugby's competitiveness and appeal in the USA. "This plan aims to make rugby more relevant and accessible in the US. It includes fostering women's rugby, embedding sevens in the American sports culture, and growing the elite men's game. Anthem RC is a cornerstone in this strategy, offering a robust high-performance pathway and contributing to MLR's long-term success."
Anthem RC's initial lineup features players from various MLR teams eligible for international competition for the USA. The club's introduction reinstates the two-conference format in the league, promising an exciting new chapter in North American rugby.
Trending on RugbyPass
2
Henry Arundell lined up for early England homecoming
3
Steve Borthwick handed fresh injury concern ahead of Six Nations
4
Standout women's rugby moments of 2024
5
Latest Comments
Generally disagree with what? The possibility that they would get whitewashed, or the idea they shouldn't gain access until they're good enough?
I think the first is a fairly irrelevant view, decide on the second and then worry about the first. Personally I'd have had them in a third lvl comp with all the bottom dwellers of the leagues. I liked the idea of those league clubs resting their best players, and so being able to lift their standards in the league, though, so not against the idea that T2 sides go straight into Challenge Cup, but that will be a higher level with smaller comps and I think a bit too much for them (not having followed any of their games/performances mind you).
fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen.
The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime.
Go to commentsIt was an odd tournament full of sides cobbled together and given strange names..as well as clearly national sides. It was for this reason hard to follow.
Go to comments