New Zealand Rugby's latest findings could kill the connection between the provincial and professional games
Imagine a future where New Zealand's provincial competition, currently known as Mitre 10 Cup, is no longer the premier and professional grassroots competition in the country.
That’s the very real possibility in the wake of New Zealand Rugby presenting their findings of a review into the state of the game in this country. It might be seen as premier in the brave new frontier NZR propose, but it darn sure won’t be professional.
Provincial Unions are currently engaged in talks with the NZRU, and according to reports, they’re all in a deep state of worry.
The very notion that the Mitre 10 Cup, or whatever it might be called in the future, may no longer be a professional competition, or at least treated as such, seems like a direct strike to the very heart of New Zealand’s national sport.
There has been a lot made of what the McKinsey consultancy firm suggested to the NZRU, so forgive me if I miss a few things in what is still a developing story, but the general push as it pertains to grassroots/provincial rugby seems to be all about participation.
Continue reading below...
That’s club rugby in particular, increasing the playing numbers in the towns and cities around the country.
In 2019, I spoke to a source in charge of developing the club game around several parts of the country.
That person told me that the entire club scene last year was “pitiful at best” thanks to a variety of factors, including participation, but also the culture embedded within club rugby right now. That culture is one of love, tradition and rivalry, but also an ever-growing frustration with the direction that the game is going in, typified by what’s happening at the very top.
The club game, and Mitre 10 Cup in recent years, is simply forgotten about. Apparently, nobody really gives a damn, but the truth is they actually do. You just don’t hear about it because the news is so flooded with what’s happening at the pointy end.
Consider how little media coverage grassroots rugby gets in New Zealand. Think about how disconnected many in the rugby media could be from this part of the game.
What NZRU want is for the the provincial unions to administer the game at that level, which is sort of what happens already, with average results at best.
Identifying ‘elite rugby players’ and developing them, under this new direction, would be left to the Super Rugby franchises. In other words, a gigantic disconnect between the grassroots (where a lot of players come from) and the professional aspect of rugby.
Naturally, the All Blacks would sit above all this and remain the biggest driver, brand-wise, of the sport in this country.
So, nothing really changes at all, except for what happens at the local level. Apparently, the only way to grow the game and keep it sustainable is to increase participation, and as some reports have suggested, that increase in player numbers is more important than unions fielding teams capable of winning Mitre 10 Cup, the Farah Palmer Cup, or - even the big one - having a solid reign defending the Ranfurly Shield.
Do these same administrators who are attempting to sell this new vision not understand that it’s in these competitions where the very heartbeat of the game can be found? Do they not see from their offices that some of the passionate support bases that’ve remained loyal to provincial sides for generations possess more fandom than the average All Black fan that swipes their ticket on the way into Eden Park?
Despite what the optics at stadiums might tell you, the love for the game at this grassroots level is very much alive and well. It was especially alive and well back in 1995 just before the game went professional.
If you go out onto the street, you’ll notice two things.
Firstly, if we are speaking about that die-hard rugby fan, a large part of this group feels consistently overlooked in the grand scheme of things because every single bit of promotion the game is getting these days leads to one place.
The All Blacks, in case you forgot.
What about the other teams that they love? What about getting behind those teams instead of effectively shutting off clear pathways for players in these grassroots teams to have a shot at the biggest level?
We’ve already seen that the model NZR might be proposing to provincial unions doesn’t work.
Look no further than the Blues, the team we all love to get behind at the beginning of a season. Think about the number of star quality players that were simply missed by the Blues talent scouts in the region. Half of them you’ll find playing for the Crusaders, the other half in Europe or Japan.
Putting Super sides in charge of managing the elite player identification process, in particular, could see more harm than good in the long run.
We’d all love to sit back in our armchairs and see our dreams of a bolter rise from the Mitre 10 Cup or Heartland Championship to make a shock debut for the All Blacks from seemingly nowhere but, under this new proposal, it’s hard to see that being even remotely possible. Maybe, what this proposal could also see come to fruition, is the best players from college rugby (which at this point seems to have more attention from the NZRU than Mitre 10 Cup) be brought straight into the Super Rugby environment, going from schoolboy to professional rugby player with a nice University scholarship thrown in.
Yes, we need to grow participation in rugby - in that, the NZR are correct. However, if we lose the integrity of the provincial competitions in the process, what’s it all really for? If we accept that the sport is broken into two tiers, where Super Rugby/All Blacks is the only professional entity which really means anything, then that leaves the game in almighty peril.
Fans don’t deserve that, and nor do the young boys and girls who still dream to one day put on the black jersey. If we aren’t careful, this new proposal could even further impact on them too, and what would that mean?
WATCH: The Rugby Championship set for a significant revamp next year.
Latest Comments
Ben Smith. My Man! So glad this is only "opinion piece". I was Reading the headline and straight away assumed you meant a 2 horse race between Pieter and Cheslin. There was no way you you meant Caelan.
Cheslin is not only the most exciting winger of this generation, but also a multi disciplined performer, Defence, Lineouts, Conversions and scrumming. LOL. He can do it all. He can put players twice his size on there rear ends and side step at full pace around on coming traffic on a penny.
I will also note that there has been since 2009 till 2017 only NZ winners bar the great one Thierry Dusautoir for France in 2011. And this was because they were the best team in the world winning back to back world cups, also having the best players at that time nominated. Never before has there been more than 2 players from the same country nominated for the award, but this year there was 3 from SA. All Dbl World Cup winning Players.
No one has been so put out about who was nominated in earlier awards, but for some reason you are.
I am thankful that its not up to you to decide on the "token" choices. (Rather lets not use that language again). The world chose the players and lets leave it there.
I don't Blame Rugby Pass for allowing this to print, but there should have been some profound editing on this.
Thanks for your opinion, But maybe lets keep it that just yours not anyone else's.
Go to commentsIf OZ are to regain their lost credibility they now need to tip up the Irish or at least run them close. Can't see that happening even though miracles occasionally occur
Go to comments