Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Nigel Owens has his say on Jake Ball's unpunished clear-out of Faf de Klerk

(Photo by Getty Images)

Referee Nigel Owens has said that the tackle by Scarlets lock Jake Ball on Sale Sharks’ Faf de Klerk in last Sunday’s Heineken Champions Cup “should be (a) red card”. Owens was responding on social media to the many complaints that Wales second-rower Ball was unpunished despite making contact with the head of de Klerk as the scrum-half was picking the ball up from the base of the ruck. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The incident was looked at during the round of 16 European match to see whether Ball was offside, but the high shot was strangely overlooked in the Sharks’ 57-14 win. 

While Owens did not explicitly state whether he thought it should have been a red card or not, he responded to those who were insistent on Twitter that contact was made to the head of de Klerk, saying that it should have been a red card if that was the case. Moreover, the Welshman emphasised that the ball being out or not was irrelevant.

Video Spacer

Devin Toner guests on RugbyPass All Access talking about freak athlete second rows

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
      Video Spacer

      Devin Toner guests on RugbyPass All Access talking about freak athlete second rows

      “It doesn’t look good from that angle but would need to see the other angle to see if contact with head and legality of the tackle. Was it not looked at by the officials?” said Owens before adding a second tweet: “If contact with head then it should be RC irrelevant if ball is out or not.”

      Owens didn’t necessarily unearth a complex or unknown law in this situation, which is all the more confusing how Ball managed to remain on the pitch. A cursory look on social media shows that the vast majority of fans clearly saw contact to the head of Sale player de Klerk from Ball’s shoulder/arm, with some providing photos and GIFS to make it clearer. 

      Some events over the past weekend suggest that there is still room for improvement in terms of officiating, particularly with regards to the use of the television match officials. What made the incident at Llanelli all the more bizarre, however, was how the illegality of the tackle was not noticed when reviewing it for being offside. 

      The South African came out of the challenge unscathed and played on, although he could have suffered a head or leg injury, but he was quick to protest to the officials in a game refereed by Mathieu Raynal of France with Philippe Bonhoure as his TMO.  

      ADVERTISEMENT

      ADVERTISEMENT

      Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo vs Kubota Spears | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Final | Full Match Replay

      Saitama Wild Knights vs Kobe Steelers | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Bronze Final | Full Match Replay

      Boks Office | Episode 42 | Investec Champions Cup Final Review

      Spain's Incredible Rugby Sevens Journey to the World Championship Final | HSBC SVNS Embedded | Episode 14

      Australia vs USA | Pacific Four Series 2025 | Full Match Replay

      New Zealand vs Canada | Pacific Four Series 2025 | Full Match Replay

      South Africa vs New Zealand | The Rugby Championship U20's | Full Match Replay

      The Game that Made Jonah Lomu

      Trending on RugbyPass

      Comments

      0 Comments
      Be the first to comment...

      Join free and tell us what you really think!

      Sign up for free
      ADVERTISEMENT

      Latest Features

      Comments on RugbyPass

      T
      Tommy B. 2 hours ago
      Rassie Erasmus wades into heated debate over Jaden Hendrikse antics

      🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

      I’ll go with one more because it’s so funny but then I must stop. There’s only so long you can talk to the nutter on the bus.

      There is no legal impediment in the GFA to ANY form of border. It’s mentioned very briefly and ambiguously but even then there’s a caveat ‘if the security situation permits’ which is decided by the British government as the border is an internationally, UN recognised formal border between sovereign states. Now, you can argue that this is because it was assumed it would always be in the EU context - but we all know the issue with ‘assumption’. As to your hilarious drivel about what you think is in the GFA, you clearly haven’t read it or at best not understood it. There are still 1,580 British Army troops in NI. The legal status of NI as part of the UK is unchanged.

      So, there was a problem for those that wanted to use the border to complicate any future British government changing regulations and trade arrangements through domestic legislation. Hence ‘hard border’ became ANYTHING that wasn’t a totally open border.

      This allowed the EU and their fanatical Remainer British counterparts to imply that any form of administration AT the border was a ‘hard border.’ Soldiers with machine guns? Hard border. Old bloke with clipboard checking the load of every 200th lorry? Hard border. Anything in between? Hard Border. They could then use Gerry’s implicit threats to any ‘border officials’ to ensure that there would be an unique arrangement so that if any future parliament tried to change trade or administrative regulations for any part of the UK (which the EU was very worried about) some fanatical Remainer MP could stand up and say - ‘this complicates the situation in NI.’

      You’ve just had a free lesson in the complex politics that went WAY over your head at the time. You’re welcome.

      Now, I must slowly back out of the room, and bid you good day, as you’re clearly a nutter.

      584 Go to comments
      TRENDING
      TRENDING South African players dominate URC Elite XV vote South African players dominate URC Elite XV vote
      Search