Nigel Owens makes salient point amid bitter lead-in to second Test
Nigel Owens has reminded fans not to forget the 'core value' of rugby after a particularly sour and acrimonious build-up to the second Test between the Springboks and the British & Irish Lions in Cape Town.
There's been widespread bitterness, barbs and back-and-forths between coaches, players, pundits and fans this week, largely after Springbok Director of Rugby, Rassie Erasmus, highlighted what he perceived as the poor refereeing of Nic Berry in the first Test.
While off-field dramas are not uncommon on Lions tours - think Justin Harrison and Austin Healey in 2001; the Brian O'Driscoll spear tackle in 2005; the Schalk Burger gouge and general Springbok aggression in 2009; or the Gatland clown nose saga in 2017 - this weeks' bickering has taken its own, uniquely bizarre route.
Unlike previous tours where newspapers were the arenas of choice, this summer's war of words has played out largely on social media, where Erasmus' has had a direct route to market with his grievances. Likewise, his critics have enjoyed the same ability to hit straight back, digitally.
It's all been very 2021.
Maybe the sourest note struck has been the suggestion that Nic Berry was disrespectful to Springbok captain Siya Kolisi. While the other points raised by Erasmus seemed like fair dinkum criticisms of Berry's refereeing, the suggestion that he was treating Kolisi differently felt like a line in the sand was being crossed.
Now Nigel Owens, who's been commentating on the matches for Sky Sports, has chipped in with a timely and refreshing reminder for the sport, suggesting fans should not forget that the core value of the sport is 'respect'.
"Even with all the pressures of test match rugby," Tweeted Owens. "We must not forget to enjoy the occasion & appreciate how much of a privilege and honour it is to be part of it. Please remember rugby’s core value of respect, we all have a part to play in upholding it. Good luck all involved."
It struck a far more convivial note after a sour week for the sport.
Of course if the Springboks do win the second Test, it could put a very different sheen on the Rassie's antics.
Latest Comments
I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.
Go to commentsYeah, and ours is waaay bigger than yours. Just as you's get a semi…oh hold on that never happens
Go to comments