Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Nigel Owens weighs in on match-defining moment as South Africa beat England

South Africa's openside flanker Pieter-Steph du Toit (R) celebrates as New Zealand referee Ben O'Keeffe (L) blows the final whistle as South Africa wins the France 2023 Rugby World Cup semi-final match between England and South Africa at the Stade de France in Saint-Denis, on the outskirts of Paris, on October 21, 2023. (Photo by EMMANUEL DUNAND / AFP) (Photo by EMMANUEL DUNAND/AFP via Getty Images)

Former referee Nigel Owens has labelled the decision to penalise England at the scrum in the final minutes of their World Cup semi-final against South Africa as “very, very, debatable,” saying it goes down to the referee’s interpretation on the day.

ADVERTISEMENT

Referee Ben O’Keeffe penalised replacement loosehead Ellis Genge for driving across against South Africa late in the semi-final, whereby Handre Pollard stepped up and converted the resulting penalty kick to give the world champions a 16-15 victory.

On Whistle Watch this week, the Welshman discussed that decision and explained why O’Keeffe came to it, all while highlighting the infringement Genge’s opposite man Vincent Koch was perceived to have committed.

Video Spacer

England coach Steve Borthwick explains why it is so tough to overcome the Springboks

Video Spacer

England coach Steve Borthwick explains why it is so tough to overcome the Springboks

“Now, big talking point in that wonderful, exciting and intense game was the last penalty in the scrum,” Owens said.

“There are a lot of things to look at here. So do we have Ellis Genge going to his knee? Yes, we do. Now what tends to happen, if a player goes to his knee, the referee will deal with that there and then. The referee here decides that Ellis Genge gets back up on his feet, so he continues the scrum. What happens next is we have Ellis Genge going across, but also some of you have quite rightly highlighted that you have the tighthead of South Africa [Vincent Koch] also going across.

Related

“So what the referee has to deal with here, he has to deal with what he believes is the first offence. So for him, the first offence is the knee on the ground. The South Africa tighthead going across then, for him, is the second offence. So it’s one of those very, very debatable ones. The only thing I would say, if you are going to penalise a knee on the ground, then you need to penalise it when it happens. Not afterwards when something else has happened. It’s a little bit like the contact area. There’s no point you coming in and penalising the second or the third offence, and not penalising the first one. It will then be too late to go back to it.

“So, in this instance here, the referee penalised Ellis Genge for going across, because he feels the action on the knee has contributed to that. It’s a very, very tough call and to be honest it’s one that comes down to your interpretation as a referee on the day.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The scrum came off the back of 20 minutes of dominance at the set piece from South Africa, as their vaunted ‘Bomb Squad’ helped book their place in the World Cup final against the All Blacks on Saturday.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

HSBC SVNS Singapore 2025 | Day Two Men's Highlights

HSBC SVNS Singapore 2025 | Day Two Women's Highlights

Jet Lag: The biggest challenge facing international sports? | The Report

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry? | New Zealand & Australia | Sevens Wonders | Episode 5

Kobelco Kobe Steelers vs Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

The Rise of Kenya | The Report

The Fixture: How This Rugby Rivalry Has Lasted 59 Years

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

34 Comments
S
Sam 529 days ago

English teams and their supporters are terrible losers. Get over it.
If you want a reason why the ref made his decision backtrack to the previous two scrums where your prop made the exact same infringement … so three and out. Really should also have received a yellow card … but let’s not confuse English team and supporters with the facts!

s
strachan 529 days ago

Headline should be: Nienaber confirms the world champions and no 1 ranked team back up No 9 ….haha 😂😂😂 they hate it that No 1 and. 2 is Southern Hemisphere teams. Enjoy the game watching it on Virgin Sport

M
Marius 529 days ago

The match deciding moment was when Owen Farrel continued to harass the referee.

F
Francois 529 days ago

It is very unfortunate that a New Zealand referee makes numerous contentious decisions in 2 consecutive matches that decide which team will meet the AB in the final.

r
ruff 529 days ago

Wasn’t that last week?
His analysis is correct as usual but not really helpful as Noone outside England cares.
Moving on….

J
Jon 529 days ago

There’s no debate in that. You always go back to the first offence (as he later points out even).

I don’t know about Nigel and these weekly podcasts. It seems like he wants to contribute something back to the game and fans, I certainly don’t think hes in it for the money, but he just doesn’t seem to put much thought into these weekly shows. He certainly hasn’t articulated what his thought process/reactions were if he does.

If I was listening to him and trying to figure out what he was trying to say I’d ask him two question. From the second paragraph it would be “So even though Koch got away with angling in the whole game, you think he would have been prepared to penalize him here, instead of Genge, if he hadn’t seen a knee go to the ground”? That would give us his picture, or his idea of O’keefe’s, make him actually state what he’d do/saw. I’d imagine he’d have gone for a reset, so I’ve had made sure he actually watched the game and thought about this by asking “so even though the ref explicitly told them to (Genge) “keep you feet up and don’t ever extend” and (Kock) “stay straight”, after they had just collapsed the last scrum, and England had had to do a whole lot of pushing and shoving with sideways movement after they got back to their feet and before the ball was even put in, as a result of Genge doing the exact thing he was told not to in overextending, all with the clock ticking down, you would have gone for a 3rd reset (or penalty to England)?” You wouldn’t load you question like that but you’d ensure he saw each point before you accepted his view.

I don’t know (enough about scrummaging) if a lack of dominance from Ox squeezing in this time could have been the reason why this scrum went sideways, and none of the others did? It also doesn’t appear he looked too hard at the tape as it was actually the hooker who went to the knee (well perhaps they both did). I would say it’s debatable that O’keefe shoudl have gone to a 3rd reset scrum after such clear warnings and later transgressions, and with that as the case, and as Nigel said about the first offence, I would have gone back to the knee, and the consequences it caused, as enough reason to award the penalty (especially if it was both 1 and 2 that went to ground).

Interesting, and a good talking point in and of itself Nigel.

S
S 529 days ago

Not helpful Nigel. Either be a ref or not. You weren't there. Your hindsight and access to slow mo's, your opinions given days after the fact, only feed the disappointed who now have fodder to throw at a current ref. You should know better.

M
Michael 529 days ago

Oh please, decision made, game over, get a life folks. It's in the history books.

J
J Marc 530 days ago

As said by W Gatland, the first debatable décision was to name Ben O'Keefe for a game for deciding the NZ opponent in a World cup final.

s
strachan 530 days ago

Why does he not weigh in on three other dubious penalties for England which was NOT debatable. Those were very very very wrong decisions 😕 from OKeefe. We did not complain about that penalty of PSD at ruck, DW surely won a penalty when an English player held onto the ball and a few more other very very very debatable decisions. Anyway does this change the teams in the final…NO.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

H
HazelBeaz 10 minutes ago
Dave Reddin lands WRU DoR role - reports

This has been a very distressful week for me, after investing a humongous amount into Coinpro, a trading platform that promised luring returns, their 25% interest on each trading was quite an enticing deal so I opted to invest £207,700 expecting huge and profitable returns, unfortunately for me I realized little too late that it was the worst financial decision blunder that I had made after they started taking me round in circles once I realized I couldn’t access my funds.

I became frustrated and anxious upon coming to accept that I could have possibly lost my life time investment. After days of struggling with my situation I soon realized I urgently needed professional help, so I dove down to research on how to recover lost my funds, it’s when I stumbled on several testimonials about LEE ULIMATE HACKER an APPROVED hacker in all recovery problems, I decided to contact them via Leeultimatehacker@aol.com & wh@tsapp +1 (715) 314 - 9248

ASAP and I was soon welcomed by good customer service from one of their staff, who took me through the recovery process, I had lost all hope but they gave me hope and within a period of 12hours I was met with good news LEE ULTIMATE HACKER and his team were able to trace my funds, this quick turn around was just the good news that i deserved after that traumatic experience I had encountered of not being able to access my funds, but that was all water under the bridge after LEE ULTIMATE HACKER kept their word and within a few hours I was able to access and withdraw all my funds. Contact LEE ULTIMATE HACKER for all your recovery problems.

0 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Matt Faessler: ‘To be involved in a home World Cup would be just next level’ Matt Faessler: ‘To be involved in a home World Cup would be just next level’
Search