1
No room for David Pocock and Michael Hooper in Australian lineup says Wallabies legend
By Online Editors
Legendary flanker George Smith wants Wallabies coach Michael Cheika to persist with his recent back row combination, even if it means putting David Pocock on the bench.
The veteran loose forward returned from a calf injury to play his first test of the year in Australia's final pre-World Cup hit out against Samoa in Sydney last weekend, an encouraging sign as Pocock embarks on a third World Cup campaign.
He also led the side in place of fellow openside flanker Michael Hooper, who was rested.
During his illustrious 111-test career Smith often started in the same back row as Phil Waugh, another specialist openside.
While Smith said Pocock and Hooper have worked well together he favoured the combination of blindside Lukhan Salakaia-Loto, Hooper and Isi Naisarani at No.8, the trio that started during the Rugby Championship and Bledisloe Cup series.
"I think the combination is working well, I think persisting with that would be great," Smith said.
"Pocock has done a lot to get back to where he is now, so I can see them working together on the field at the one time, and also Pocock coming off the bench."
Owen Finegan, a World Cup-winning Wallabies loose forward in 1999, disagreed, believing Pocock and Hooper should start together with Naisarani at No.8.
"I think with Isi, Pococok and Hooper you have a really dominant back row," Finegan said.
"Australia got through to the 2003 World Cup (final) with Phil Waugh and George Smith so its been proven that you can get there," he said, admitting the ploy could affect the Wallabies set piece.
Hooper and Pocock are both undersized lineout targets so the Wallabies would have to be "clever" to secure possession.
Finegan, who scored the Cup-clinching try against France at Cardiff 20 years ago, believed the current squad could deliver a third World Cup crown.
"The pressure is on the Wallabies and quite often that's when you perform the best when your backs are against the wall and no one gives you a chance," he said.
"I experienced that myself that myself in 1999, we definitely didn't go into the World Cup as favourites."
Smith, who played several years in Japan, said the tournament would be an interesting challenge for the competing nations.
"It's going to be extremely hot and I think embracing the culture and embracing the people is definitely going to assist you," he said.
AAP
In other news:
Trending on RugbyPass
2
Jake White: Ireland, Australia and Wales have the same problem
3
David Campese names his Springbok world player of the year winner
4
Let's be real about these All Blacks
5
Latest Comments
Agreed. Borthwick will have to write a new excuse book soon .
I have looked at the two world cup final teams from 2003 and 2020.
2003 team scored 187 tries between them in 389 caps
2020 team scored 113 tries between them in 473 caps. As you can see a huge disparity in scoring rate. Only Johnny May with 36 tries in 78 caps scored a higher amount of tries. Elliot Daly comes close but the rest are frankly very poor.
Farrell and Ford scored a pathetic 20 tries between them in a combined 210 caps.
There again , the 2003 team did have Wilko and Greenwood etc whereas 2020 team had Ford and Farrell .
So much people saying that Fords strength is of bringing others into the game .
Really. The figures totally disprove that notion .
It has been mentioned elsewhere that we have accepted mediocrity far too often and the figures would indicate that players are or have been picked far too often without performing .
Go to commentsNot disputing that NZ are ahead of Eng. Also not saying Eng are unlucky (though clearly the tone of the article is not that the ABs were unlucky but that they 'should have' won). Your team are looking great and are on the up. I just felt that Pundits have argued Eng 'should have' won the first test against the ABs, when it's more nuanced than that, and very fine margins determine results that Eng didn't get right. Same applies, therefore, to NZ and other nations. Ben Smith though doesn't seem to see it that way. To be clear: I'm not saying I agree with the 'should haves', but more that I take issue with the phrasing.
Good to see your respect for other nations is so strong! Proper rugby fan you are!!!
Go to comments