Orange card called for following Brumbies' victory
Brumbies coach Dan McKellar has called for the introduction of an orange card following a "ridiculous" red card for Tom Banks in the one-point win over the Western Force.
Banks was sent off in the 29th minute of Friday's match for an accidental clash of heads with Toni Pulu as the Force flyer attempted to cross over for a try.
Replays appeared to show Pulu deviated ever so slightly, possibly contributing to the head clash.
Banks came off second best, with the Wallabies back suffering a facial fracture that could keep him out for an extended period.
The 27-year-old was taken to hospital and is awaiting the results of scans.
Super Rugby Pacific implements the experimental 20-minute red card rule, meaning teams can replace a player who has been sent off after 20 minutes.
Under old rules, the team would be down a player for the rest of the match.
McKellar believes red cards should be reserved for more serious offences and that players shouldn't be replaced.
Instead, he believes an orange card should be the new 20-minute penalty, with yellow cards to remain at 10 minutes.
World Rugby has flirted with the idea of an orange card in recent years.
"I'd have an orange card, a 20-minute orange card," McKellar said. "And red card stays for deliberate foul play. You know, punching, gouging, whatever it may be."
Even if that system was in place, McKellar doesn't believe Banks should have been penalised given the clash of heads was clearly accidental.
"Tom Banks doesn't have a dirty bone in his body," McKellar said.
"Deliberate foul play - throw red cards at them all the time. But for accidents, for god's sake, we're going to have accidents every week.
"Banksy is sitting in hospital now with a facial fracture. I don't think he deliberately went in to do that. I think it's ridiculous.
"He's five metres away from his line potentially trying to stop the ball. There's a head-on-head collision. Toni changed direction. It's crazy."
The Force scored 28 points while the Brumbies were down to 14 men.
But a hat-trick of tries to winger Andy Muirhead was enough to get the Brumbies over the line.
It's the second heartbreaking loss the Force have suffered at the hands of the Brumbies this season.
In round one, the Brumbies sneaked over the line courtesy of a 79th-minute try to Lachie Lonergan.
Force coach Tim Sampson said those results shows his team aren't far off the top sides.
"It's twice now that we've lost to the team that's undefeated by a small margin," Sampson said.
"I think that shows our potential as well. It just proves that when we're on, we're there. We just need consistency."
- Justin Chadwick
Latest Comments
Skelton may be brought back for the Wallabies so that would be the only reason that may hinder Wilson. Easily the form, most skilful and game IQ of any Oz 8. Valentini’s best and favourite position is 6, but lineouts may be an issue with Skelton, Valentini and Wilson. Will be interesting what Schmidt goes for but for me Wilson should be picked on form. Schmidt rewards work rate, skill and consistency. All that glitters every so often won’t be in contention. Greely is one of those players that has a knack of making the right decision. A coach is going to love him because he knows week in week out he’s going to get the job done. The second try Greely wasn’t the guy who made the initial break it was Flook, Greely was at the bottom of the ruck when Flook was off along the sideline. Greely got up and made the effort to catch up with play but also read the play nicely and hit the pass from Campbell at pace and then held the pass beautifully to Ryan.
Go to commentsSharks deserved to be far further back by the last quarter. Their tackling was awful, their set pieces were disappointing, their defensive organization was poor (especially on the Kok side of the D line), they kept making unnecessary errors, and they never looked like cracking the Clermont defense during those first 60m. Masuku kept them in touch, with some help from the Clermont generosity on penalty opportunities. Agree with the writer of this article. It was belligerence, and ability to raise their pressure game just enough, that turned the last quarter into a Bok-style shutout. Clermont have a reputation of not playing the full 80m, and there was a bit of that for sure. But, quite often when the intensity of a team drops off in the last quarter credit is due to the opponent for tiring them out. At 60m, with the Kok try, you thought that just maybe the game was on. At 70m, with the Mapimpi contribution, one felt that Clermont were fading, while facing a team that would maintain the pressure game through the final whistle. Good win in the end, but the Sharks are still playing way below their potential. And with their resources, and a coach that has had enough time to figure things out, they are running out of excuses.
Go to comments