Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Our set-piece wasn't up to the standards we expect and they came after us'

Dejected and wet - Ireland players in Cardiff

Rory Best conceded Ireland had no answer to a dominant Wales display as Warren Gatland’s side sealed Grand Slam glory in the Six Nations with a 25-7 win in Cardiff.

ADVERTISEMENT

Wales took a second-minute lead through Hadleigh Parkes’ try and Gareth Anscombe added 20 points from the tee, with the 2018 champions unable to get on the board until Jordan Larmour touched down beyond the 80th minute.

Gatland consequently became the first coach to win the Grand Slam on three separate occasions.

In his final Six Nations match, Ireland captain Best felt his team were unable to respond to the early blow Wales dealt them.

“Wales had a cracking start and they delivered a game. They’re a very good side, a very determined side. They’re very hard to beat at the Principality Stadium,” Best told the BBC.

“We just couldn’t get a foot in the game. Our set-piece wasn’t up to the standards we expect and they came after us. They really put a lot of pressure on us and we struggled to respond.”

Ireland overcame number-one ranked New Zealand in October but defeat to Wales was their second loss of the competition, having gone down 32-20 to England in their Six Nations opener.

ADVERTISEMENT

Best, competing in his final match in the competition, was not too concerned about the recent setbacks, despite them coming in a World Cup year.

“It’s a very competitive Six Nations. We’ve lost to two very good sides. We’ll have to go away and address why we lost and how we can get better,” he said.

“We always strive to get better. We haven’t done that. We’ve been a little inconsistent in these championships. We’ll have to dust ourselves off and try to finish the calendar year strong.

“It’s very disappointing. We can talk about the aftermath later on – you just have to give credit to Wales, deserved Grand Slam winners. We just have to congratulate them.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Lions Share | Episode 4

Zimbabwe vs Namibia | Rugby Africa Cup Final | Full Match Replay

USA vs Fiji | Women's International | Full Match Replay

Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jfp123 5 minutes ago
Why New Zealand learned more from their July series than France

It will be great if Jalibert improves in defence, but unless and until he improves substantially, I think he should be out of the running for the national team. If you look at the French A side, attack is not usually so much of a problem - they scored 200 points in the last 6 nations without MJ on the pitch. Defence however can be an issue, Penaud isn’t the greatest in that area for a start. So a 10 who is solid in defence is badly needed. And given his poor defence record, MJ would be bound to be targeted by shrewd coaches like Rassi and Razor, so he needs to be able to withstand that.

Also, given sufficient improvement in defence, there are still factors which tell against MJ. I think the 7/1 bench has been a very successful experiment, and for that you need flexible backs who can play in more than one position in case of injury. Then there’s how well the 10 plays with France’s best 9, Dupont. And even if you think MJ is better when there’s no Dupont or 7/1 split, stability in a test team is important, so it’s better not to go chopping and changing the 10 needlessly. There’s also the question of temperament - MJ doesn’t shine at his brightest when it really matters, eg WC quarters and Top14 finals, and look at his test record over the past 2 years.

I see Ntamack as by far the best option at 10. Rugby is a team game, and apart from his excellent defence, there’s his partnership with Dupont, his versatility, and all the other skills that go to making a great team player and a great 10. He’s excellent under the high ball, an area where France tend to have a weakness, and has fine strategic and team management skills, great handling skills and so on.

While having star quality is important, it’s not the be all and end all, as illustrated by UBB this season. Imo, though undoubtedly very good, they underperformed. With best wings, best 9, as Dupont barely played in the Top14, with Jalibert and leading centres and 15, plus a strengthened forward pack, they couldn’t match ST in points scored, despite the latter’s huge injury list which left some positions seriously weakened, at least on paper.

For next season, I hope ST are back to their scintillating best with injuries healed, that LBB is back to rude health for UBB, that the exciting promise of La Rochelle’s and Toulon’s new recruits bears fruit, Bayonne continue to defy their budget and we have a cracking, highly competitive Top14 and Les Bleus triumphant in the autumn internationals and six nations!

258 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Mick Cleary: 'The soul was not lit up by underwhelming Lions first Test' Mick Cleary: 'The soul was not lit up by underwhelming Lions first Test'