Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Phil Dowson refuses to blame referee for Northampton’s loss

By PA
David Ribbans on the charge - PA

Northampton boss Phil Dowson insisted it was Saints’ dismal first half and not a dubious refereeing decision that underpinned their 38-15 defeat in Saturday’s Gallagher Premiership semi-final.

ADVERTISEMENT

Saracens were outstanding as they ran in five tries to set up a Twickenham appointment with either Leicester or Sale in a fortnight’s time.

But wing Sean Maitland was lucky to stay on the pitch after clattering into George Furbank as the rivals contested a kick 25 seconds into the game.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

Maitland appeared to strike Furbank’s head with his elbows but referee Karl Dickson issued only a penalty and to rub salt into the wound the Scotland’s international scored Saracens’ first two tries.

“The referee didn’t give it. I presume the TMO looked at it and made a decision that it was a rugby contest and therefore play on,” Dowson said.

“We’ll have to look at it again. I don’t know where Maitland was looking. I don’t know where he was in conjunction with the ball in the air. Whether I agree with it or not is irrelevant.

“You need to be lucky here and whether that’s an element of the luck or not I don’t know.

“A couple of things didn’t go our way but I’m sure Sarries would say the same thing. That was one of those decisions that didn’t go our way, rightly or wrongly.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Everyone will have an opinion on it. But it was still 15 a side and we conceded three tries in the first half.

“In a semi-final against the best team in the league, you’re going to struggle, no matter what decision is made by the referee.”

Saracens director of rugby Mark McCall felt Dickson had made the correct call.

When asked if Maitland was fortunate to stay on the pitch, McCall replied: “No. I thought it was a good decision.

“Sean probably didn’t need to do what he did, which is to pull out because he’s going to compete for the ball. I thought it was a good decision.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Northampton staged a fightback in the third quarter but Saracens showed resolve before hitting back with a late penalty try and Max Malins touchdown.

“I thought it was our strongest defensive performance for years. It’s always been the DNA of the club and that’s as good as we’ve been for a while to be honest,” McCall said.

“That laid the foundation for the victory and the performance. We were physical and got control of a very good attacking team. The players felt in control.

“You’re not going to have a semi-final your own way all the time. I was very pleased with how we dealt with it. We were emotionally consistent and strong.

“We got on with the next thing, put energy into the next thing. We did our jobs and got back to basics. These things happen in finals and semi-finals and we dealt with it really well.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo vs Kubota Spears | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Final | Full Match Replay

Saitama Wild Knights vs Kobe Steelers | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Bronze Final | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 42 | Investec Champions Cup Final Review

Spain's Incredible Rugby Sevens Journey to the World Championship Final | HSBC SVNS Embedded | Episode 14

Australia vs USA | Pacific Four Series 2025 | Full Match Replay

New Zealand vs Canada | Pacific Four Series 2025 | Full Match Replay

South Africa vs New Zealand | The Rugby Championship U20's | Full Match Replay

The Game that Made Jonah Lomu

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tommy B. 4 hours ago
Rassie Erasmus wades into heated debate over Jaden Hendrikse antics

🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

I’ll go with one more because it’s so funny but then I must stop. There’s only so long you can talk to the nutter on the bus.

There is no legal impediment in the GFA to ANY form of border. It’s mentioned very briefly and ambiguously but even then there’s a caveat ‘if the security situation permits’ which is decided by the British government as the border is an internationally, UN recognised formal border between sovereign states. Now, you can argue that this is because it was assumed it would always be in the EU context - but we all know the issue with ‘assumption’. As to your hilarious drivel about what you think is in the GFA, you clearly haven’t read it or at best not understood it. There are still 1,580 British Army troops in NI. The legal status of NI as part of the UK is unchanged.

So, there was a problem for those that wanted to use the border to complicate any future British government changing regulations and trade arrangements through domestic legislation. Hence ‘hard border’ became ANYTHING that wasn’t a totally open border.

This allowed the EU and their fanatical Remainer British counterparts to imply that any form of administration AT the border was a ‘hard border.’ Soldiers with machine guns? Hard border. Old bloke with clipboard checking the load of every 200th lorry? Hard border. Anything in between? Hard Border. They could then use Gerry’s implicit threats to any ‘border officials’ to ensure that there would be an unique arrangement so that if any future parliament tried to change trade or administrative regulations for any part of the UK (which the EU was very worried about) some fanatical Remainer MP could stand up and say - ‘this complicates the situation in NI.’

You’ve just had a free lesson in the complex politics that went WAY over your head at the time. You’re welcome.

Now, I must slowly back out of the room, and bid you good day, as you’re clearly a nutter.

584 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Jonny Hill: Tractor tyres, trophies and the fan altercation at the Rec Jonny Hill: Tractor tyres, trophies and the fan altercation at the Rec
Search