1
Rassie Erasmus on Etzebeth prognosis and Kriel incident
By Ian Cameron
Springboks director of rugby Rassie Erasmus has confirmed that star lock Eben Etzebeth is set to be sidelined for roughly 10 days.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Sharks enforcer came off after just 30 minutes during South Africa’s 18-3 victory over Scotland in Marseille in their Rugby World Cup opener at the Stade Velodrome.
“It’s always tough in a game like that – opening game of the World Cup – but I do like the honesty when he said ‘Guys, I’ve got a sore shoulder’. You know, 85-per-cent-ready Eben won’t be able to contain a team like Scotland.
“At this stage it looks like a seven to ten day injury, like Jean Kleyn was, and like Canan (Moodie) was.
“So there is some time to manage him, but the scans will give us a definite on it. We might find out it’s much more serious, but at this stage it looks like a ten-day injury.
“Today we’ll probably have hundred per cent clarity, I believe, on Eben and what’s the extent of that. Then we’ll have to make the right call, because we can’t have players who’s 70 or 80 per cent (who don’t) turn to a hundred per cent in the next seven to ten days. We will have to think clearly.”
He also spoke to press speculation around the possible citing of centre Jessie Kriel, who collided with Jack Dempsey just two minutes into the game.
ADVERTISEMENT
“We are really comfortable; there hasn’t been a citing (and) I’m pretty sure there won’t be a citing.
“If it isn’t direct head contact – and it wasn’t, it was tackled on the ball and then he moved up after tackling on the ball. I’ve seen a few stills where people just (show) after direct contact to the ball.
“If you took it a millisecond or a second or two back, you’ll see that he clearly tackled on the ball. So we’re very happy with how it was refereed.
“I think Finn Russell’s call was much closer. Unfortunately, he got injured then, I think that deflected a little bit from the action that he did, but we were happy with the decision that was made.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Obviously there’s some time to do citings still but I’ll be very surprised for the indirect contact – with first contact on the ball – that there will be anything from that.”
Cannot believe Gregor's response/reasoning, he is basically saying the only way Scotland can beat the Boks is by having a Bok sent off. If he honestly thinks Scotland lost that game because someone wasn't sent off then sadly mistaken and will get a rude awakening in this tournament. With this very slippery ball due to the conditions, all the Big teams that won over weekend looked brilliant on defense (Eng, Boks, France). Later in the comp. temps and humidity will be dropping so attacking teams (Scotland, ABs & Fiji) will look a lot better.
I understand that winning is why everyone flogs themselves. But the "winning at all costs" mentality displayed by Erasmus and a few on here is increasingly difficult to view without feeling nauseous. I suspect the vehemence of denials indicates that many believe it was a red card and the non-award is inconsistent with the decisions made in other matches. In conspiracy theory, if you don't like someone's question, change the topic. Erasmus deflecting Kriel/Dempsey with Russell/Arendse seems consistent with that approach.
SA deserved the win, but all the other "stuff" that seems to arrive with the Boks is very poor.
The only thing thats poor is all these pathetic absurd attempts to constantly bring the Springboks down. Credit to Erasmus and the springboks on a great win, must be painful for the haters trying their best to always find fault, constantly. Erasmus simply answered when pushed by the rampant media pushing the narrative, unlike say for example Gregor Townsend who really seems to have convinced himself Kriel cost them the game, absolutely delusional that team would have lost to 14 or 13 South Africans last week, completely outplayed in every facet.
He said clearly that the tackle was indirect and on the ball editing video to make it look bad is CYNiCAL
2 options; they rescind Tom Curry's red card or give Kriel and the Chilean captain reds. Let's be consistent.
Read the reply!!!
Think world rugby lawyers have since had them taken down (all videos on soc media), but there was another angle showing all the impact was through the ball thus the violent recoil, it was a brush of the cheeks, continental style, so no HIA, no blood, no card, correct decision
I didn’t see the Chilean incident, but I saw Curry’s and Kriel’s and they are not, even remotely, the same thing. Cameras can lie, blood pouring from gashes cannot. There was no head collision.
Erasmus is a clown, no need to reinforce the fact.
Sorry, is that a typo? Is it supposed to say Nigel is a clown?
Naaige, you're back! Yay! You & daddikins still doing the thing on the backseat of yer mummy's taxi?
Btw, what's england's world ranking now? You must be mighty proud!
get stuffed prick