Rassie Erasmus selects Andy Farrell's Ireland matchday 23 for him
With just a few days before the Test between South Africa and Ireland in Pretoria, Rassie Erasmus has turned on the mind games.
The Springbok head coach took to social media this weekend to try and get into Ireland head coach Andy Farrell’s head.
In a post on X, Erasmus predicted Ireland’s matchday squad for the first of two Tests between the sides in July.
1. Andrew Porter
2. Dan Sheehan
3. Tadhg Furlong
4. MC McCarthy
5. Tadhg Byrne
6. Peter O'Mahony
7. Josh van der Flier
8. Caelan Doris
9. Craig Casey
10. Jack Crowley
11. James Lowe
12. Bundee Aki
13. Gary Ringrose
14. Calvin Nash
15. Jimmy O'Brien
16. Ronan Kelleher
17. Cian Healy
18. Finlay Bealham
19. James Ryan
20. Ryan Baird
21. Nick Timoney
22. Conor Murray
23. Ciaran Frawley
**If 5/3 split:**
- Robbie Henshaw
Erasmus believes Andrew Porter, Dan Sheehan and Tadgh Furlong will be Ireland’s starting front row with Joe McCarthy and Tadhg Beirne in the second row.
The Bok coach has Peter O’Mahony, Josh van der Flier and Caelan Doris in Ireland’s back row.
With Jamison Gibson-Park ruled out with an injury, Erasmus is confident that Craig Casey will form a halfback combination with flyhalf Jack Crowley.
According to the Bok boss, Bundee Aki and Garry Ringrose will fill the midfield roles, while the back three will consist of James Lowe, Calvin Nash and Jimmy O’Brien.
Erasmus believes Farrell will opt for a six-two bench split between forwards and backs. However, he has bracketed Robbie Henshaw as an option if Ireland go for a five-three split.
The Bok coach also took some time to compare certain stats between the matchday squads ahead of the series.
And it seems Ireland will be the heavier team next weekend.
Erasmus also hinted at his selection after revealing that his matchday squad will have a total of 1,162 caps.
After the first Test at Loftus Versfeld on July 6, the teams will meet again at Kings Park in Durban on July 13.
Latest Comments
The boy needs to bulk up if wants to play 10 or 11 to handle those hits, otherwise he could always make a brilliant reserve for the wings if he stays away from the stretcher.
Go to commentsIn another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.
First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.
They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.
Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.
Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.
That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup
Go to comments