Ref Watch: Rugby shoots itself in the 'player safety' foot again

The need to try and keep the game moving is drilled into all referees as they work their way through the ranks. Little is more frustrating for opponents and spectators than endless time-wasting and cynical attempts to slow the game down. Yellow cards were introduced for just this sort of offence.
However, the one item higher on the radar of match officials at every level is that you take zero chances with player welfare, regardless of how long it takes.
For speed of access, medical support personnel are allowed to follow the game inside the roped off area known in law as 'the playing enclosure.' They have total freedom at any point to run on the pitch and treat an injured player, then as long as they need to deal with what they find.
Where this medical resource is sometimes not available at lower levels it is endlessly drilled into referees that they are not qualified or authorised to make medical decisions. Quite simply you stay out of medical matters and let those with superior skills take over. From a paramedic team in an ambulance to a guy with a bucket and sponge or a first-aid trained teacher or fitness coach playing for the opposition it is over to them.
And where you are unhappy with the outcome you always err on the side of safety. I recall being in charge of a university game when there was no trained medical support available. A player who suffered a heavy head blow declared himself ready to continue when a quick look into his eyes and his unsteady gait suggested - even to my untrained eye - that he was anything but.
His team had no replacements so a lengthy debate ensued which eventually reached the point of me giving them the choice of playing with 14 or having full time called there and then. They suffered a heavy defeat but by the end the injured player had recovered enough to thank me for saving him from himself.
The relevance of this to Damon Murphy's contribution to Italy's round two Six Nations defeat by England is that he broke this golden rule.
Perhaps keen not to excessively delay a high-profile match being televised live, or mindful of criticism heaped on officials who request endless TMO replays when the outcome is apparent after two or three, or maybe just failing to think clearly enough under pressure, the Australian official made a big mistake.
England winger Jack Nowell was receiving treatment from his team's medics midway through the first half following an accidental head contact when Murphy came into camera.
This triggered the ITV commentary team, Nick Mullins, Lawrence Dallaglio and Ben Kay, to explain the procedure which is now in place at elite level whereby an independent doctor views concussion footage from the sidelines.
This process exists to ensure that no player is put at risk by his own team's medic - perhaps under pressure from their miked-up head coach - to short-cut the head injury assessment process when a player initially appears OK.
England's medic was clearly happy with Nowell but waiting for the all clear to be issued by the man in the stand.
But Murphy hurried this process along by advising "If he's not going to go to HIA let's go. Back his decision please." The medic hesitated before pointing to the stand and responding: "On the field is fine; let's wait for the video check."
However, Nowell then jogged back to his position, the medic left the pitch and play restarted without the independent doctor giving his agreement.
"I don't think those watching the video replay have given the all-clear," Kay said in commentary. "The ref has rushed that decision which is wrong."
At this point the clock showed 14.56 and when play next stopped at 16.06 Nowell left the field for an HIA which he failed and as a consequence was permanently replaced by Elliot Daly.
Thankfully Nowell had very little involvement during that 70-second period but nonetheless at a time when player welfare has never been more under the spotlight, and 24 hours after English rugby suffered a tragedy at a level seven game in the Midlands, this is really not the point.
The protocols are there for a reason and need to be followed to the letter.
Game Management
Even putting this incident to one side, the third Australian ref to take charge of a Six Nations game this weekend was the least impressive.
In particular it seemed his standards were set too low when considering penalty trends and their impact on the match.
At international level little happens by accident and players should expect zero tolerance from the officials. However, the Azzurri had conceded eight penalties to England's two in the opening 34 minutes before Murphy felt a warning was required.
Similarly, in the second half England survived until the 76th minute before acting captain Henry Slade was summoned for a talking to. By this juncture they had also infringed on eight occasions to Italy's four.
In Murphy's defence few of these penalties were close to either try-line, but even when Tom Curry did cynically slow the ball on the ground in his defensive 'red zone' nothing more than a penalty resulted.
Itoje Disallowed Try
A number of people have queried on social media why the TMO was allowed to intervene and subsequently rule out the 'try' Maro Itoje claimed following a close-range 32nd minute lineout.
Former England lock - now forwards coach at Championship club Ampthill - Mouritz Botha was one of these.
Under law 15 the TMO may intervene for foul play (as distinct from technical infringements) and to help the onfield officials adjudicate on the award of tries.
Clause 15 (d) specifically includes examination of phases leading up to the score, so looking at a forward pass - or in this instance lineout obstruction - is within their remit when a try results.
Scrum
The second half opened with the award of penalties to England at the first two scrums but thereafter it was all Italy with a free kick and three penalties going their way from the next seven set-pieces.
Three of these came at consecutive scrums, but as per his relaxed approach to persistent infringement Murphy declined to take any further action.
Latest Comments
I recommend Marie (infocyberrecoveryinc@gmail com and WhatsApp: +1 7127594675) for recovering lost or stolen bitcoin, USDT, or any other cryptocurrency from fraudulent investment sites because they are very knowledgeable in the industry and will reimburse all of your money.I can say with confidence that she was the only one who was able to credit my account with $52,760 of the money that had gone missing, based on my prior transactions with them. She was the only one who could. Since they are the only ones that can fully return your missing funds to your account without any deductions, I sincerely appreciate their job and am recommending her to you today.
Go to commentsThe Team That Reclaimed My Stolen Cryptocurrency/ Hack Savvy Tech
As an Australian student with a deep passion for studying law in the UK, I have always been committed to pursuing higher education and advancing my career. My dream was to attend one of the prestigious universities in the UK, and like many students, I was searching for scholarships to ease the financial burden of studying abroad. However, what began as an exciting opportunity soon turned into a nightmare.I came across an advertisement on Facebook for a scholarship opportunity, which promised to cover all my tuition fees and living expenses. The offer seemed too good to be true, but as a young student eager to pursue my dreams, I didn’t think twice. The scholarship application process appeared legitimate, and I was soon in contact with someone who claimed to represent a reputable organization. I was asked to pay an upfront fee as part of the application process, which I believed would be reimbursed once I received the scholarship. Excited about the possibility of studying in the UK, I didn't hesitate to pay the required amount AUD 15,000.The money I paid wasn’t just from my own savings; my parents had to borrow the money to help me fulfill my dream. They trusted that I was making the right decision, and they supported me in this endeavor, hoping that it would set me on a path to a successful future. Unfortunately, as the weeks passed, I received no updates, and all communication from the supposed scholarship provider suddenly stopped. When I tried to reach out, the contact information I had was no longer working, and the website I had applied through was taken down. Realizing that I had fallen victim to a scam, I was devastated. The money, which my parents had borrowed with great effort and sacrifice, was gone, and my hopes for studying abroad seemed shattered.Feeling helpless, I turned to various recovery services, hoping that someone could help me get my money back. Most services offered little more than false promises and vague advice, leaving me feeling more frustrated than ever. That’s when I discovered HACK SAVVY TECH. After extensive research and reading positive reviews from other scam victims, I decided to give them a try. HACK SAVVY TECH acted swiftly, gathering all the necessary information, tracking the scammer's digital footprint, and initiating the recovery process. To my relief, after several weeks, they successfully recovered the full amount of AUD 15,000. I couldn’t believe that what seemed like an impossible task had become a reality. Now, I wholeheartedly recommend HACK SAVVY TECH to fellow students and anyone who may find themselves in a similar situation. They provided me with both the expertise and the support I needed, restoring not only my finances but also my faith in the possibility of recovering from such a terrible experience. If you ever find yourself in a situation like mine, I encourage you to trust HACK SAVVY TECH they truly know how to help.
mail: contactus@hacksavvytechnology.com
Website: https://hacksavvytechrecovery.com
Whatsapp : +79998295038
Go to comments