RFU statement: Apology issued to community game over tackle law
The RFU have issued an apology for the anger and concern it has created amongst the rugby community in England following last week’s surprise revelation that the tackle height would be reduced to waist high. That January 19 announcement ignited a huge debate across the sport regarding the plan that will radically change rugby at all levels below the Gallagher Premiership and the Championship.
Amid calls for council members who voted in the measure to resign due to the lack of information that backed up their decision to lower the tackle height, the RFU have now followed up on a promise made on Thursday to produce the evidence. This they have now done on Friday afternoon, including two explanatory attachments with their apology.
A consultation process will now begin next week with the RFU stating that it wants to "develop the details of its domestic law variation", a climbdown from last week's position that rubberstamped without public consultation the introduction of waist-high tackle limit from the summer of 2023 onwards.
The statement read: “The RFU board, council and executive staff apologise for the anger and concern that has been created among the rugby community by announcing the decision to lower the tackle height from next season.
“In our desire to act quickly to reduce head impacts and concussions in the community game, which represents 99 per cent of the rugby-playing population in England, we have upset many of you who are the champions, volunteers, and ambassadors of our game. We fully acknowledge we got the engagement wrong, and we are truly sorry.
“In making our decision we were aware that France have lowered the tackle height, New Zealand will be doing so and World Rugby supports this approach. We, like the French, used the term ‘waist and below’ - this has caused misunderstanding and confusion. We would now like the game to help us define how we describe a lower tackle height to reflect what the research is telling us in a way that is understood by all.
"Consequently, the risk of head injuries should be reduced if tackling below that optimum height. We will now begin a series of forums and workshops with players, coaches, match officials and volunteers, to explain and develop the details of the domestic law variation.
“A large body of scientific evidence demonstrates the risk of head injury and concussion for players can be reduced by lowering the tackle height to prevent head-on-head contact. However, we also accept that the rugby community has other concerns that this change may bring and we need to listen, understand and respond to those concerns.
“We will start inviting players, coaches, match officials and volunteers to these forums from early next week so that we can all work together.”
- Click here for the rationale and evidence paper;
- Click here for the tackle height science presentation.
Latest Comments
How do you feel about Schmidts progress now?
When you say turners then around - they were horrendous and got absolutely pumped by wales at the World Cup and by Argentina recently
So it’s not hard to improve from that
And now they play a decent side (albeit still not top four) and get pumped 4 tries to 1
The ABs have their own issues but I’ll take our 6 class props and other areas of improvement every day
Go to commentsUmaga-Jensen at 26 has the attributes of a 2nd-5 and has moved past injuries that hampered his earlier elevation to AB status. I agree with TI that we persist with playing people out of position and ignore the best positional players from selection.
Go to comments