1
Rivals want Saracens like punishment for Montpellier, despite huge fine in salary cap case
By Ian Cameron
The noses of Montpellier Hérault's Top 14 rivals has been left out of joint after the club came to an "amicable" settlement in their salary cap case this week.
Montpellier were fined €3 million, but face no further sanctions, after coming to an agreement with the LNR. The club had been accused of irregularities during the 2018/19, following an expose by L'Equippe and RMC. The LNR stated that the "parties are pleased that an amicable solution has been found and that it is allows us to work in the future in a peaceful atmosphere."
The accusation revolved around the signing of South African flyhalf Johan Goosen, and a number of other top players. A report had suggested that money paid sums to Goosen and other players via a shell company in South Africa, so that the majority of their salaries would not be counted towards the salary cap.
Unsurprisingly, their rivals are not best pleased at what will effectively amount to modest fine for billionaire MHR owner Mohed Altrad. Racing 92’s Jacky Lorenezetti and Toulon owner Bernard LeMaitre have both voiced disapproval of the punishment.
"But this mediation leads to another question: is there justice for the rich and justice for the poor? What a wealthy president can buy himself offenses as he sees fit?," Lorenezetti told L'Equipe. "For Saracens, the financial punishment was negligible considering the fortune of the owner. Is the financial penalty appropriate in sport? It's a hell of a snub for the FFR Appeal Commission."
New Toulon owner LeMaitre said he was 'surprised' by the cozy arrangement. "I am simply surprised and astonished that the League lends itself to" arrangements "with serious offenders. In this context, what's the point of the rules? And what is the value for those who insist on respecting them despite the difficulties of succeeding."
Montpellier are no strangers to the salary cap manager. Last year the club had a €470,000 salary cap fine – €70,000 for the failure to communicate certain elements and €400,000 for exceeding the ceiling – for the 2017/18 season annulled.
The Top 14 club was originally sanctioned for having exceeded the €11.3million per annum payroll ceiling. This decision was taken by the salary cap section of the league’s disciplinary committee, the body set up to strengthen control over how clubs spend their money.
They were already in the dock for exceeding the ceiling by an estimated €350,000 to €400,000 during the 2016-2017 season.
Trending on RugbyPass
2
England call up Ollie Lawrence replacement
3
Five options England have to replace Ollie Lawrence
4
5 things we learned from this weekend’s Six Nations action
5
Latest Comments
I think France have made really good improvements. They have found several players on the bench and in the wider squad who are able to now operate at the level of their starters, they have power and devastation on the bench and can change the game. Their gameplan has also evolved and they are able to stay in the fight for longer. Fitness and conditioning seems to have become primary work ons. They have worked massively on breakdown where they forced so many turnovers and always slowed down Irelands ball. How many times did you see a French hand on the ball fighting the first and second cleaner tooth and nail for access before being shoved off of it? They become like a pack of rabid dogs on turnover and transitions, they counter so much better now and you can see elements of the Bordeaux and Toulouse game written all over the team. Its almost like a swarm when they counter. They have great alignment between the Top 14 and the national team and they have a group of players who are well versed in playing this style. You could see clearly in this game why both Galthie and Erasmus now fancy a 7-1 stack against Ireland. It is by and large to overpower them and demolish their breakdown. Irelands attack has devolved. Its now more metronomic than creative. It involves phase after phase of attritional attack and hordes of possession but it lacks creativity and purpose after the second or third phase. The Ireland attack of old kept teams guessing. You didnt know if they were gonna go wide or close in, you had to worry about the offload, the inside pass, the blindside and the hooker on the wing. Now it seems like they move the ball side to side while patiently waiting for the dam wall to break. They also lack pace and bite in the outside channels without Hansen and Lowe. Nash and Osborne were not on it and they struggled to contain the outside French backs who were incredible. France had more leaders that stood up, more grit and more power and it all proved too much for Ireland to handle.
Go to commentsKarefi is from the same mold as Savea, have him in the ABs in a heart beat.
Go to comments