'Rod's a very smart man, I'm a little bit surprised he said it': All Blacks reject Kafer claims
The All Blacks have slammed former Wallabies back Rod Kafer for declaring Australian captain Michael Hooper was the target of deliberate foul play in the Bledisloe Cup opener in Perth.
Assistant coach Ian Foster called on Kafer to contemplate his remarks in the wake of Australia's 47-26 win, a match influenced by the red card shown to lock Scott Barrett.
Kafer opined that Barrett's shoulder to the head of Hooper was intentional and part of a wider New Zealand plan to rattle the home team's skipper.
Earlier in the game, All Blacks flanker Ardie Savea had pushed Hooper's head into the ground after the whistle to cost him a penalty.
It sparked memories of how the Wallabies would seemingly employ niggling tactics against influential former New Zealand skipper Richie McCaw.
Kafer said it went too far with Barrett.
"This was a deliberate act, attacking a player's head with a shoulder and elbow in a vulnerable position," he told Fox Sports.
"You go into games trying to unsettle the leaders of an opposition team, it's pretty standard."
Veteran All Blacks lock Sam Whitelock said he found the comments hurtful, while Foster was equally adamant that Barrett's act wasn't intentional.
"The answer's no, it wasn't. Rod's a very smart man, I'm a little bit surprised he said it," Foster said.
"They can say what they like, it doesn't change the truth.
"I'm sure Rod will sit down one night and have a cup of tea and think to himself that that wasn't quite the truth after all."
Claim and counter-claim over foul play has marked the days since the boilover result.
The All Blacks were reportedly unhappy at Australian players routinely employing "neck rolls" at the breakdown and would demand it be monitored by match officials in Saturday's second Test at Eden Park.
The New Zealand Herald claimed to have counted 14 incidents of neck rolls, a potentially dangerous way of clearing defenders to win quick ball.
The allegation comes a year after the Wallabies accused the All Blacks of the same tactic in Auckland, resulting in a significant neck injury to star flanker David Pocock.
Foster wouldn't push the issue on Tuesday, believing New Zealand are in no position to claim the moral high ground after Barrett's red card and subsequent three-week ban.
"There's no point in us highlighting anything else. We've been found guilty of something. We'll take our medicine on that," he said.
Foster said finding the balance between physicality and foul play is a challenge in every Test and the Wallabies got it right in Perth.
"So, forget about all the other things, who might have done what and all that sort of stuff, we lost the physical battle and we have to be better than that."
- AAP
Latest Comments
It is if he thinks he’s got hold of the ball and there is at least one other player between him and the ball carrier, which is why he has to reach around and over their heads. Not a deliberate action for me.
Go to commentsI understand, but England 30 years ago were a set piece focused kick heavy team not big on using backs.
Same as now.
South African sides from any period will have a big bunch of forwards smashing it up and a first five booting everything in their own half.
NZ until recently rarely if ever scrummed for penalties; the scrum is to attack from, broken play, not structured is what we’re after.
Same as now.
These are ways of playing very ingrained into the culture.
If you were in an English club team and were off to Fiji for a game against a club team you’d never heard of and had no footage of, how would you prepare?
For a forward dominated grind or would you assume they will throw the ball about because they are Fijian?
A Fiji way. An English way.
An Australian way depends on who you’ve scraped together that hasn’t been picked off by AFL or NRL, and that changes from generation to generation a lot of the time.
Actually, maybe that is their style. In fact, yes they have a style.
Nevermind. Fuggit I’ve typed it all out now.
Go to comments