Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Rouet, De Goede, and Holtkamp reflect on Canada's tough loss to England

DUNEDIN, NEW ZEALAND - OCTOBER 27: Sophie de Goede of Canada charges forward during the WXV1 match between England and Canada at Forsyth Barr Stadium on October 27, 2023 in Dunedin, New Zealand. (Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images)

Canadian coach Kevin Rouet lamented his side’s moments of indiscipline in their 45-12 WXV 1 loss to England in Dunedin. Red Roses hooker Lark Atkin-Davies was the main beneficiary of her side’s efficiency at set piece, scoring four tries off lineout drives.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We needed a good performance for 80 minutes and we maybe played OK for 30 minutes. Even then offensively we didn’t score when we had to score. We have an issue with that aspect of our game.” Rouet said.

The Canadians did well to compete in the first half, even though they conceded a try in messy circumstances after only six minutes. A kick through by Holly Aitchison bounced away from the Canadian defenders to be grounded by Ellie Kildunne to open the scoring.

“I think we were silly with the first [try],” captain Sophie de Goede said.

“Then we got our feet back underneath us and were playing well, but then indiscipline and they kicked to the corner. It was frustrating to let that one in to end the half. It gave them a lot of momentum.”

England scored two tries just before the break, directly as a result of being given lineouts within striking distance. Rouet agreed that it was frustrating given how much ball Canada had in the first half.

“Yes for sure. As soon as they get a penalty, it’s a maul, from five metres out it’s tough to defend that. We failed on that, in a few key moments.”

Lock Courtney Holtkamp said that fixing those issues will be a key focus for next week.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s on us as a team to know when to go into the breakdowns, to know when to try and poach the ball. We have to keep each other accountable, telling your team mates to keep hands off the ball, tapping them on the backside and getting them out of the ruck. Playing smarter, basically, it’s simple.”

One positive was that the Canadians followed through on a work on last week, which was to get more into the game in the opening stages.

“We’d really focused on the first 20 minutes,” Holtkamp said.

“England scored in the first few minutes, but overall that first half was really good. Tomorrow we’ll go over film and get right into training.”

De Goede said that on reflection, it was obvious where her side needed to improve.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Our lineout, we need to get that sorted and adjust our maul defence. There were moments that were really good and we just need to finish those moments consistently.

“There’s a lot of belief in the group and I know we’re going to get there eventually. I was hoping that was going to be today but unfortunately credit to England, it wasn’t to be.”

Canada now have an extra day to prepare for their final WXV 1 match, against France next weekend in Auckland, another big challenge as France look to close in on winning the tournament.

“France is a top-three team, we will try and reach them and beat them. It’s not the same team as England but we will prepare for them, for sure,” Rouet said.

ADVERTISEMENT

HSBC SVNS Singapore 2025 | Day Two Men's Highlights

HSBC SVNS Singapore 2025 | Day Two Women's Highlights

Jet Lag: The biggest challenge facing international sports? | The Report

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry? | New Zealand & Australia | Sevens Wonders | Episode 5

Kobelco Kobe Steelers vs Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

The Rise of Kenya | The Report

The Fixture: How This Rugby Rivalry Has Lasted 59 Years

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
How key Waratahs playmakers could reshape Joe Schmidt's Wallabies backline

Yeah like a classic comedy show, not too different to how he went at the same venue last year? Perhaps there’s something about that latitude that puts his equilibrium off?


The rush on Jo was fine though, you’d catch most players out with Dmacs ex3cution of it. There were actually quite a few instances like that, not too dissimilar to that Bledisloe game actually, were things just didn’t work out for no luck of trying to skill. I laughed when Dmac took himself out of that try and basically gifted it to them by trying to bowl over Kellaway was perhaps the most comical.


Actually now you say that, yes, very reminiscent of Aus v England wasn’t it. The two changes at halves have been instrumental for me. Not that the first two weren’t playing well, but these two seem to pair up better, with everyone. Like you say with those sorts of counter attack plays, they are on instinct and that stuff needs to be shared with everyone. That’s another thing too I was thinking, in that respect guys returning can be a hinderance to a team playing well, but I might have just thought that because I wasn’t sure (hadn’t seen much) which of NSWs midfields were best suited where.


I’m very similar in my TMO preference as well. I had actually said to myself several times already this season (SR here) that they are pretty bullish basically telling the ref what theyve seen as fact. If I remember rightly it even happened a few times in November and some of the refs then said “no, I’m actually happy with that.” etc. But very tough on Maybe (I think) who probably has plss poor vision on the big screen to say anything otherwise, so yes, definitely just make it an offer to look and also communicate ‘why’ precisely to the ref, and (just like he does to the players) he can even say to the TMO “no I was happy how I saw it live, I don’t need a replay thanks” etc. He started like that I think, “I’d like to review a simultaneous grounding” but then yes, he took over after. Of course in the refs minds, it’s the right call, thoughts how it’s always been ref’d, even when theres a good few frames in the slowmo that actually show ball obviously hitting grass first (which they didn’t in this game), they’ve always ruled that (like in cricket) if the ball continues to then be ground on the line after (or in the same frame in this example) they always gone ‘dead ball’. The new SR committee apparently what to making the line the attacking teams so they award the try’s instead of taking them away, but just like I said with them not wanting to look closely at the first forward pass (like they did for the Chiefs try), I don’t want random JRLO level decisions, and giving the line to the attacking team is just going to make clear no trys, a try instead. It’s exactly the same result.

44 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will wounded Carbery come back to haunt former side Munster? Will wounded Carbery come back to haunt former side Munster?
Search