1
Rugby Players Ireland statement: 'We are very disappointed'
By Ian Cameron
Rugby Players Ireland, the body representing professional rugby players' interests across the island of Ireland, have said they are 'very disappointed' following media reports that the IRFU are pushing for a 20 per cent pay cut.
This week it was reported in Irish media outlets that the IRFU are set propose more permanent players salary cuts, similar to cuts being proposed across other unions.
The statement from Rugby Players Ireland reads: "We are very disappointed to see recent media reports about proposed player salary cuts. We are in the very early phase of discussions with the IRFU to establish fully the current and long term financial position of the Union and only then can the players fully consider any proposal.
"Rugby Players Ireland will not be commenting further at this time."
In March the IRFU implemented changes in player salary payments due to the coronavirus outbreak, which has shaken the global game. However, unlike in France where there has been an across the board 30 per cent pay cut and England where some clubs have instigated a 25 per cent pay cut, players in Ireland adopted a payment deferral model.
In a statement at the time, the governing body for rugby in Ireland explained: “The IRFU, Connacht, Leinster, Munster and Ulster, in agreement and partnership with Rugby Players Ireland and its members, have agreed a payment deferral model for all employees.
“These deferrals, based on an equitable sliding scale which ranges from 10 per cent to 50 per cent, will be effective from April and beyond if required but will remain subject to constant review of the financial circumstances of the IRFU and provinces. The IRFU hopes to return to full pay, and repay any deferrals, as soon as possible.”
However, the IRFU are now seeking a blanket 20 per cent pay cut according to reports.
Trending on RugbyPass
2
All Blacks player ratings vs Italy
3
South Africa player ratings | 2024 Autumn Nations Series
4
Scotland's Sione Tuipulotu admits anger at Australian rugby
5
Latest Comments
Agreed. And I don't have much more to say on it, but I had been having one thought that sprang to mind at the tail of this discussion, and that is that it's not all about Razor.
It's not about any coach being "right". I think a lot of selections can become defense and while it doesn't really apply here I really enjoyed that Andy Farrell just gave into the public demands and changed out his team for the change that had been asked for. Like why not? This is the countries team, keep them engaged. The whole reason i've only just finished watching the game was because I wasn't interested in watching any of the selected players against a team like Italy (still actually enjoyed the first half with the contest Italy made of it).
Faz leap frogs a younger half back into start. He hands the golden child the game over July's golden child. He gives an old winger a go, a new flanker and hooker. None of them really did any good, certainly not enough to suggest they should have been promoted above others, but who cares? You won, and you gave the country what they wanted, that's all that matters after all. It's for the country, not the one in charge who thinks they have to have their own pied piper tune playing.
Go to commentsAs Naas would say... A win is a win.
It was not perfect and at times frustrating. All 3 tests were not the best by the Boks and they still found ways to win.
Rassie would have noted the sloppyness at times and silly mistakes. The 9's made amateur handling mistakes when clearing the rucks in all 3 tests.
Once the "stupid" mistakes are eliminated, this Bok team will be very very hard to beat.
Go to comments