SA Rugby issues update on potential alternatives to Super and PRO14 rugby
Plans to restructure local rugby competitions in South Africa are currently under discussion in the wake of the recent measures introduced to deal with the Covid-19 pandemic. These plans could see South African franchises and other provincial teams return to a new, locally-based derby competition in view of the current suspension of Vodacom Super Rugby and the Guinness PRO14.
SA Rugby CEO Jurie Roux has confirmed the national rugby body is in ongoing discussions with stakeholders about a number of competition models that could be implemented. “SA Rugby is currently evaluating all our competition structures, with a view to restructuring it in the interim so that we are able to afford game time to all our franchise and provincial teams,” said Roux.
Stormers doctor Jason Suter reveals how they saved the career of Pieter-Steph du Toit last month
“Obviously, nothing can happen in the next few weeks until the ‘period of social distancing’, as instructed by President Cyril Ramaphosa, has lapsed. We are considering local derby matches between our South African teams. We must still drill into the specifics, but we are confident we will be able to put a feasible plan on the table that will be suitable for everyone.
“These are extraordinary times which call for extraordinary measures and it also offers us an opportunity to be innovative. We are working closely with our broadcast partner, SuperSport, and other important stakeholders and will announce plans once we are in a position to do so,” Roux added.
SA Rugby also announced they were throwing their full weight behind its country’s government policies and objectives in the face of the Covid-19 pandemic. Nathi Mthethwa, South African Minister for Sports, Arts and Culture, briefed national sports federations on the government’s plans and called on sports bodies to support the campaign.
“We wholeheartedly and without hesitation are completely aligned to the government’s aggressive approach to attempting to curb this pandemic,” said Mark Alexander, SA Rugby president. “All rugby has been suspended until the end of April and we have changed our business practices to support the need for ‘social distancing’.
“I call on the entire rugby fraternity to play their part in support of the government in curbing this pandemic. The Springboks showed last year that we as a nation are stronger when we are together and now is the time for all of us to act. We will continue to support government initiatives and directives and follow the advice of the Department of Health and other advisory bodies to beat back the disease.”
SA Rugby have cancelled all internal travel – unless business-critical – and all international travel – under any circumstances – until further notice. The organisation’s office remains open although an optional work-from-home policy has been introduced during the national emergency to allow for social distancing and self-isolation among other protocols.
“All face-to-face committee meetings have either been postponed or turned into online meetings and we continue to review forthcoming competitions,” continued Alexander. “These are unprecedented times and require unprecedented responses as well as the support, understanding and wholehearted engagement of all engaged in sport.”
WATCH: Schalk Brits tells RugbyPass about his experiences bringing the William Webb Ellis trophy back to South Africa
Latest Comments
I didn't mean to sound down on Dmac. Just looking hard at the bench sub's role of providing impact. I don't think he can do that at 15, and the bench is not really about injury cover anymore (you need to maximise it's use more than that).
He's my first choice of any New Zealander for the 10 jersey with the All Blacks.
Go to commentsAgreed. And I don't have much more to say on it, but I had been having one thought that sprang to mind at the tail of this discussion, and that is that it's not all about Razor.
It's not about any coach being "right". I think a lot of selections can become defense and while it doesn't really apply here I really enjoyed that Andy Farrell just gave into the public demands and changed out his team for the change that had been asked for. Like why not? This is the countries team, keep them engaged. The whole reason i've only just finished watching the game was because I wasn't interested in watching any of the selected players against a team like Italy (still actually enjoyed the first half with the contest Italy made of it).
Faz leap frogs a younger half back into start. He hands the golden child the game over July's golden child. He gives an old winger a go, a new flanker and hooker. None of them really did any good, certainly not enough to suggest they should have been promoted above others, but who cares? You won, and you gave the country what they wanted, that's all that matters after all. It's for the country, not the one in charge who thinks they have to have their own pied piper tune playing.
Go to comments