SANZAAR boss Andy Marinos reveals cutoff date for revamped Super Rugby competition
SANZAAR chief executive Andy Marinos has revealed that plans for a revamped version of Super Rugby will be on the table until the end of the year.
The competition was suspended last month with the coronavirus pandemic shutting sport down around the world.
Since then, plans for a domestic version featuring New Zealand's five Super Rugby franchises was pushed by NZ Rugby until the country moved into alert level 4 which stopped any further progress around the competition.
However, Marinos confirmed that NZ Rugby and the rest of the SANZAAR governing bodies will have the rest of the year to sort out their respective Super Rugby competitions.
"If you start getting towards the back end of September/October and we still haven't had a resumption of rugby, I think logic would say that's when we would consider that [cancelling the season]," Marinos told Newshub.
"We have a calendar that can now go up until the end of December and our players are now on an extended period of rest, so we have till the end of 2020 to configure something.
"I wouldn't want to be definitive as to when there is a point of no return. We have to work with the confines that we have and, at the moment, that looks like between May and December 31 … to put a competition structure together and get a competition under our belts."
Marinos also confirmed that any resumption of Super Rugby will be based on a domestic format across three zones – New Zealand, Australia and South Africa – with the Argentinian Jaguares joining South Africa while the Japanese Sunwolves would join the Australian teams.
Resuming the competition in its traditional form isn't possible with current travel restrictions, he added.
"We will continue to work closely with all the governments and health authorities in all the jurisdictions we are playing. That's central to our focus at this point.
"We have put a revised competition format to the front of the table, which is largely domestically focused and that is within the controls we can manage.
"That's what we are looking at. We still have time and we will certainly look at how we optimise both the international and 'Super' programmes, but the clear message is the Super format we are used to for so many years will become a local-market focus, without the necessary crossover."
"Could you be playing the Rugby Championship at the same time as a domestic competition?" Marinos said.
"It's not trying to rubbish one for the other, it's how do we get a sensible solution in what may be a restricted time frame?"
In this scenario, Super Rugby sides would play without their international players during Rugby Championship test match windows.
"Logic would suggest if there is an ability to create like what we've seen with the NRL around a bubble, if it's all in one location it seems a bit easier."
The Sydney Morning Herald reported the four countries that compete in the Rugby Championship – New Zealand, Australia, South Africa and Argentina – have prioritised test rugby over resuming Super Rugby.
The report suggests SANZAAR is weighing up a "quick fire, six-week competition in one country, and likely one state or city", with Australia being a strong candidate due to its more lenient pandemic measures compared to New Zealand and relatively low rates of infection compared to countries like South Africa.
Australia is also the geographical middle ground with Perth reportedly being an ideal location for any proposed competition because of its time zone.
Rugby Australia's general manager of professional services Ben Whitaker told the Sydney Morning Herald that getting test rugby started was a priority for SANZAAR.
"There is definitely a collective commitment to prioritising test match footy," Whitaker, who has been in discussions with other SANZAAR nations, said.
"But we are also committed to community safety, first and foremost. We roll off the back of that. But we are ready with different formats. Hopefully that's sooner rather than later."
Whitaker also said there are still hopes for a resumption of Super Rugby.
"The other thing we are committed to is trying to get some Super Rugby played as well," he said. "As you squeeze towards the back end of the year, you have to have various models to handle that."
New Zealand Rugby later responded to the report saying no decision has been made on any proposed competition yet.
"New Zealand Rugby is reviewing a range of competition options, both domestically and internationally, for when rugby is able to resume," chief executive Mark Robinson said in a statement.
"However nothing has been decided and any decisions will be made in alignment with advice from the Government. At this stage any competition options are purely speculative."
The Rugby Championship was scheduled to begin on August 8, with the All Blacks facing the Wallabies in Melbourne and the Springboks taking on the Pumas in Johannesburg.
This article first appeared on nzherald.co.nz and was republished with permission.
Latest Comments
Turn it up. Give me your john A game would ya!
Go to commentsI didn't really get the should tone from it, but maybe because I was just reading it as my own thoughts.
What I read it as was examples of how they played well enough in every game to be able to win it.
Yeah I dunno if Ben wouldn't see it that way (someone else would for sure need to point it out to him though), I'm more in the Ben not appreciating that those close losses werent one off scenarios camp. Sure you can look at dubious decisions causing them to have to play with 14 or 13 men at the death as viable reasons but even in the games they won without such difficulties they made a real struggle of it (compared to how good some of their first half play was). This kind of article where you trying to point out the 3 losses really would most likely have been wins only really makes sense/works when your other performances make those 3 games (or endings) stand out.
There might have been a sentence here and there to ensure some good comment numbers but when he's signing off the article by saying things like ..
and..
I don't really see it. Always making sure people are upto date with the SH standing/perspective! NZ went through some tough times with so many different perspectives and reasons why, but then it was.. amusing how.. behind everyone was once they turned a corner. More of these 'unfortunate' results returned against SA and France at the start of the RWC which made it extra tasty to catch other teams out when they did bring it. So that created some 'conscious' perspective that I just kept going and sharing re thoughts on similar predicaments of other teams, I had been really confident that Wallabies displays vs NZ were real, that the Argentines can backup their thing against Aus and SA (and so obviously the rest), and current one is that England are actually consistent and improving with their attack (which everyone should get onboard with), and I'm expecting a more dominant display against Japan (even though they should have more of their experienced internationals for this one) that highlights further growth from July. 👍
Go to comments