Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

SANZAAR statement: Savea banned following throat-slitting gesture

(Photo by William West/AFP via Getty Images)

All Blacks back-rower Ardie Savea has copped a ban following his throat-slitting gesture towards a Rebels player during last weekend’s Super Rugby win by the Hurricanes in Melbourne. The Hurricanes skipper was yellow-carded for his involvement in a first-half scuffle and he apologised for his subsequent gesture both on live TV and in person post-game with the Rebels player he had targetted.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, despite that post-game acknowledgment, Savea was still cited for the incident and has now paid a disciplinary price, his one-game ban seeing him miss this coming weekend’s home match for the Hurricanes versus the Blues.

A statement read: “A SANZAAR judicial committee hearing has found Ardie Savea of the Hurricanes in breach of SANZAAR disciplinary rule 6.1. Savea received a yellow card, for an offence against law 9.27 in the 40th minute of the match between the Rebels and Hurricanes at AAMI Park on March 3.

Video Spacer

The game that made Maro Itoje a superstar in rugby

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
      Video Spacer

      The game that made Maro Itoje a superstar in rugby

      “Following the match, Savea was cited for a separate incident occurring immediately after the first offence – again under law 9.27: A player must not do anything that is against the spirit of good sportsmanship.

      “The SANZAAR judicial committee of Nigel Hampton KC (chair), Mike Mika and David Croft assessed the citing case and in his finding, judicial committee chairman Hampton ruled the following: Having conducted a detailed review of all the available evidence, including all camera angles and additional evidence, including from the player and submissions from his legal representative, Aaron Lloyd, the judicial committee found the foul play did not breach the red card threshold.

      Related

      “With respect to sanction the judicial committee deemed the act of foul play merited a warning as it was close to but did not breach the red card threshold. Savea was issued with a warning from the judicial committee with regard to this incident. As a result of this, that meant that he received a yellow card and a warning from the same match.

      “SANZAAR disciplinary rule 6.1 states: If a player has received two warnings or a combination of a warning and a yellow card during a match, he shall be treated for disciplinary purposes as if he had been sent off. Therefore, Ardie Savea was required to reappear before the SANZAAR foul play review committee as a result of his persistent offending.

      ADVERTISEMENT

      “In order to expedite and preserve the proper judicial process and with the agreement of all parties, the same committee members reconvened to sit as a foul play review committee and review the breach of SANZAAR disciplinary rule 6.1.

      “In his finding, Hampton ruled: The foul play review committee conducted a detailed review of all the available evidence and oral submissions from Savea’s legal representative.

      “With respect to sanction the foul play review committee ruled after considering a number of factors, including the guidance of World Rugby regulation 17 appendix 4, and due to the nature of the player’s persistent offending with both the yellow card and the warning being issued for unsportsmanlike play, that an appropriate sanction for the player would be a suspension of one week. That was accepted by the player he is therefore suspended up to and including Saturday, March 11.”

      ADVERTISEMENT
      Play Video

      South Africa vs Black Ferns XV | Women's International | Full Match Replay

      Play Video

      Namibia vs United Arab Emirates | Asia/Africa Rugby World Cup Play-off | Full Match Replay

      Play Video

      Lions Share | Episode 5

      Play Video

      Classic Wallabies vs British & Irish Legends | First Match | Full Match Replay

      Play Video

      Did the Lions loosies get away with murder? And revisiting the Springboks lift | Whistle Watch

      Play Video

      The First Test, Visiting The Great Barrier Reef & Poetry with Pierre | Ep 6: The Ultimate Test

      Play Video

      KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

      Play Video

      New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

      Trending on RugbyPass

      Comments

      1 Comment
      A
      Andrew 875 days ago

      One of the most pathetic episodes ever for the media and citing committee. They should hang their heads in shame. This puerile nonsense must not happen again.

      Join free and tell us what you really think!

      Sign up for free
      ADVERTISEMENT

      Latest Long Reads

      Comments on RugbyPass

      S
      SK 2 hours ago
      Lessons the Wallabies must heed to turn Lions heartbreak into future success

      Brett I love your fresh take on the picture that needed to be painted and ultimately wasnt. I agree there just wasnt enough in it for the ref to call it back and ultimately the ref was consistent the whole night at the breakdown. Australia are damned disheartened now but look how close it came to beating a team Campo said would thrash them by 30. This is the perfect prep for the Rugby Championship and the Boks and NZ. The Boks will be able to bring a scary pack to face the Aussies but it will be just as scary as facing these lads and so the Wallabies for me are making progress. They are not quite the finished article and the soft moments and tries and passive defence just proves it. Schmidt was brought in to make Australia better, he was brought in to make sure Australia improved in time for the Lions to avoid an embarrassment and look he has done that and taken them close so while the result is gutting its a job well done so far. lets see if they can take one step further and pilfer a test off these patchy Lions. Just a quick word on refs and the laws. Can we please tell World Rugby to simplify the game. At least 5 or 6 laws were examined in the wake of the last minute cleanout and several said Tizzano should have been pinged, others say Morgan should have been pinged. If former players and refs cant agree on what the right call was then it means the game is too complex. The refs have a clear mandate to let the game flow. I agree with that but the laws must support the refs. Right now they do not and leave too many holes for the refs to plug. The result is a furore after every major engagement between nations where the refs are abused.

      36 Go to comments
      I
      IkeaBoy 2 hours ago
      'The Wallabies only have themselves to blame': How the Lions sunk Australia in Melbourne

      I’m a proud Irishman with a weakness for the underdog. My only stake in the game was an Aussie win to take the series to a decider. Even overlooking the actual clear out - which was the only thing Piardi instructed the TMO to review - I think it’s very easy to be objective and say that Australia got done on the calls.


      It’s a phase of play that unfolds in less than 10 seconds but is fairly easy to breakdown.


      1 - Ryan (#19 Lions) is tackled legally, goes to ground in possession of the ball but makes no effort to release the ball. He has to immediately once he goes to ground. PENALTY.


      2 - Tizzano (#21 Australia) is first man to the ball (from either team) and forms the ruck with his own hindfoot. Side entry doesn’t apply to him as the ruck is not formed at this stage but rather it’s formed by him. NO PENALTY.


      3 - Even to completely ignore the actual clear out (penalty/no penalty), foul play can still have occurred without the need for a HIA. The fact that Tizzano is walking around and available for the next match doesn’t mean he didn’t get emptied. His mouthguard data does seem to have registered an almighty force though. 50/50.


      4 - Both Morgan (#20 Lions) and Genge (#17 Lions) go to clear out but both do so by driving through the ruck off their feet and falling over the ball. Sealing. PENALTY


      5 - I still don’t understand why none of the coverage picks up on this - Morgan holds Tizzano’s feet in a wrap on the pitch after the clear out. On the match clock it’s 79.03 to 79.07 before he releases. Playing the player off the ball. PENALTY


      Piardi controls the narrative when reviewing with the TMO and starts on the wrong foot. The discussion is all on the basis that both sets of players arrive at the same time (which changes mitigation around foul play) which they don’t. They clearly don’t as Tizzano is first to the ball.


      For 79 mins that match was brilliant. The crowd was brilliant. The atmosphere seemed brilliant. It’s a loss on the sport that a gang of mic’d up officials can not get it right.

      179 Go to comments
      LONG READ
      LONG READ 'Impossible not to be emotional': How Ian Prior came out of retirement to help Zimbabwe end Rugby World Cup drought 'Impossible not to be emotional': How Ian Prior came out of retirement to help Zimbabwe end Rugby World Cup drought