Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Saracens' radical step in bid to head off more accusations about their finances from rival clubs

Ben Earl and his Saracens team-mates after their loss at Racing 92 (Photo by Mike Hewitt/Getty Images)

Saracens are to invite auditors to examine details of how they are currently operating under the Gallagher Premiership £7million salary cap in a bid to head off more accusations about their finances from rival clubs.

ADVERTISEMENT

Saracens were fined £5.36million and deducted 35 points – putting them bottom of the league – after being found guilty of breaching the salary cap in each of the previous three years.

However, other Premiership clubs, led by Exeter Chiefs, believe there is still a smoking gun to be found in the financial affairs of the Premiership and Heineken Champions Cup double winners.

There have been calls for a mid-season audit to be taken which normally happens at the conclusion of the season. In response to this, RugbyPass understands the club will take the initiative and voluntarily open its doors to official scrutiny. 

It is expected that Premiership Rugby Ltd, the umbrella organisation for England’s top flight, will be given the chance to ‘view the books’ through their official auditors.

(Continue reading below…)

Video Spacer

Chiefs chairman Tony Rowe claimed in The Times newspaper on Monday that Saracens had also breached the regulations in the 2013/14 season and as a result of the continued negative publicity, Saracens are attempting to take some control over the situation. 

The move to invite in auditors now is aimed at dismissing suspicions that Saracens are still operating above the £7m cap. The club has already made it clear they believe that after the fine and points penalty they are now “complying strictly with the salary cap regulations in the current season”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Saracens maintain that their compliance with the salary cap was never part of the investigation which decided that co-investments between club owner Nigel Wray and leading players including Maro Itoje and Owen Farrell had to be included in earnings. 

Despite insisting they had done nothing wrong, Saracens opted not to appeal against the fine and points deduction. Wray stated that the club would “work transparently with Premiership Rugby”. This latest move by the reigning English and European champions is aimed at proving that is now the case.

WATCH: Former Saracens player Jim Hamilton discusses the salary cap scandal surrounding his former club

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

KOKO Show | July 8th | Bernard Foley stops by to talk the Wallabies winning and Lions being tested

England v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Georgia vs Ireland | Men’s International | Full Match Replay

Lions Share | Episode 2

Chile vs Romania | Men’s International | Full Match Replay

USA vs Belgium | Men’s International | Full Match Replay

Touchdown in Dublin, The Red Sea Returns & We Prepare to Face Argentina | Ep 2: The Ultimate Test

South Africa v British & Irish Lions | 2009 | Second Test | The Vaults

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 22 minutes ago
Beauden Barrett weighs in on controversial yellow card

Yeah theyve been back and forth on this ruling for years. They dished out yellow cards anywhere on the field, then basically went to scrums instead, then started penalizing again, and it is only recently that the yellow card has been used again.


For instance Aaron Smith got penalized by Barnes for sticking his hand out in the RWC in France and the TMO intervened wanting the harsher punishment (as it appears that’s where WR has the refs moving towards again), even though both Barnes and the TMO said/worded the infringement the same it would appear Barnes seemed happy to accept he should have carded him.


I actually felt sorry for Barnes in that WC/Final, he seemed to have developed a good feel for the game and ref’d those situations perfectly but was overridden but the TMO on multiple occasions.


The trouble with the law is that this weeks does look similar to Villieres, but it’s entirely possible BB was playing the man instead of the ball (which you can’t say in Villieres case). In that A Smith case there was still traffic well out from the goalline, and in that Eben example it was more deliberate and only 5m out with an overlap (and if talking about that French game, they ruled that to have gone backwards so we don’t quite know what they would have done). That last situation had been when, for the last few years, a penalty would possible be upgraded to a card, not so much the Villiere (or Smith) example. But that’s obviously changed. Back to Beauden though, the real problem with the law (we can accept a YC as long as they are consistent) is that he could put his arm into that exact same position for ether action, tackle, or block, and the ref has no real way of knowing which. This extends to the development of certain ‘slapping’ tackle techniques, where a tacklers intent is mostly to stop the offload, and includes getting the arm in the path of the ball, whether still held by the attacker, or released by them. This action is no less illegal and deliberate in it’s intent than Ebens. It’s not even reactionary (not that you can be lenient in those situations) like Villieres. And it has the exact same effect on the game, whether its its clearly been passed to a team mate, or someone it’s trying to offload to a team mate, of removing skill/attacking play.


Actually another aspect of contention with the law is that it is now classed as foul play. It’s been referenced that in this weeks example the pass went forward, into Barrett, so his hand wasn’t even in the correct position to block a legitimate pass, but because they ruled his intent was to block it, now being “foul” play the forward pass is ignored. So you’ve got someone sent from the field blocking a pass that wasn’t even a pass.

32 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Rugby World Cup regulars torn apart by Uruguay in Montevideo Rugby World Cup regulars thrashed by Uruguay in Montevideo
Search