Saracens reveal Jackson Wray has suffered a shocking head injury
High-flying Saracens have confirmed that back-rower Jackson Wray suffered a worrying head injury in last Sunday’s Gallagher Premiership win over Northampton at Franklin’s Gardens. The 31-year-old forward was a half-time replacement for Billy Vunipola and he went on to play his part in a deserved 30-6 win that kept his club in second place behind leaders Leicester.
However, it has since emerged that Wray fractured his skull during his appearance from the bench and is now waiting to hear back from a consultant this week about how severe the injury is and how it will be treated.
In an injury update posted on the club’s official website that provided an update seven currently injured players, including the sidelined England skipper Owen Farrell, Saracens said about Wray: “Seeing a consultant this week after suffering a fracture in his skull last weekend against Northampton Saints.”
Wray, who had an issue with a concussion earlier this season, has made more than 250 first-team appearances for the club and Saracens' latest Premiership win was their eighth in eleven outings this team which left them nine points behind Tigers.
The remainder of the Saracens medical bulletin issued on Wednesday read: “Alec Clarey is recovering from an ankle injury and will be back at the start of February. Aled Davies has a calf injury which will keep him out until the start of February.
“Duncan Taylor has had surgery on his shoulder, due to return in March. Marco Riccioni’s surgery on a knee injury sustained on international duty was successful. He is continuing his rehab but will remain on the sidelines for the rest of the season.
“Owen Farrell is progressing well after ankle surgery and is due to return in mid to late January. Ralph Adams-Hale had shoulder surgery in October and will be back in action at the start of February.”
Latest Comments
I’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.
Go to commentsThose are pretty good draws for the two top Aussie teams. I certainly wouldn't want my Chiefs to have a quarter final in Brisbane. None of the top teams will want the Crusaders.
Go to comments