Saracens could potentially receive equal RFU funding as 11 other cash-strapped Championship sides
Despite the slashing of the annual RFU grant to Championship sides as of next seasons, relegated Saracens could be set to receive an equal share of the much-reduced sum.
The RFU announced that they would be radically reducing funding to English rugby's second league, which is nominally fully professional, but who rely heavily on the subsistence payment from the governing body.
The announcement has caused dismay across the league. This season Championship sides were able to avail of roughly £500,000 per club, which would work out at the equivalent of 20 players at £25,000 per season.
That figure has nearly been halved. According to an RFU statement, aggregate funding will amount to approximately £288,000 per club and "represents a return to the levels of funding prior to the 2016 - 2020 cycle".
Continue reading below...
WATCH: Jim's had a traumatic weekend but he's made it into the studio to discuss Ellis Genge's interview and Finn Russell's ongoing bust-up with Gregor Townsend! We analyse South Africa joining the Six Nations and throw in a few rumours out there.
RugbyPass asked the RFU to clarify if Saracens - as a Championship club - would receive the payment and a spokesperson for the body said it was yet to 'confirm the specifics' of the funding.
Not only could Saracens possibly receive this grant, but they are potentially set to avail of at least £2million in a Premiership parachute payment on their way to the second tier.
Despite an imminent player exodus, Saracens are expected to bounce straight back into the Premiership from the Championship. However, the job of competing with the English giants for smaller Championship clubs has just become significantly harder.
Championship clubs are furious at the cuts. A joint statement from Cornish Pirates and Coventry Rugby said: "For the RFU to then use their own failure to deliver on these as a justification for unilaterally decimating the Championship is nothing short of outrageous, not least because it has come from people – CEO Bill Sweeney and Director of Performance Rugby Conor O’Shea – who have been in post for only a short time, in Conor’s case just a matter of weeks and with Bill only having been in the sport for six months."
Elsewhere Saracens will be donating £1,000 for every try scored by Saracens Men at Allianz Park to three good causes for the remainder of the 2019/20 campaign.
The initiative will begin when Mark McCall’s side host Leicester Tigers on Saturday 7th March and money raised for each home dot down will be equally split between Saracens charity partner Duchenne UK, the Saracens Sport Foundation and the Saracens High School.
This weekend’s match against Sale Sharks (Saturday 15th February) will also be used to raise money for a separate charitable fund.
Worcester Warriors second row Michael Fatialofa’s JustGiving page will receive £1,000 for every Saracens try during the game as well as money collected via buckets around the ground, in the hospitality lounges and on the club’s match day shuttle buses.
There will also be a book where supporters of both Saracens and Sale Sharks can write messages of support for Michael.
Fatialofa sustained a life-changing spinal cord injury at Allianz Park in January and RPA’s (the official charity of the Rugby Players Association) campaign is raising funds to support the 27-year-old and his family with his needs throughout this testing time.
A statement read: "With the ongoing uncertainty over Michael’s prognosis, length of rehabilitation and future career/work prospects, donations will help cover immediate necessities as well as future finances, costs and unforeseen expenses of Michael and his family."
For fans who would like to donate directly, they can do so via the following link: https://www.justgiving.com/campaign/michaelfatialofa
Latest Comments
The boy needs to bulk up if wants to play 10 or 11 to handle those hits, otherwise he could always make a brilliant reserve for the wings if he stays away from the stretcher.
Go to commentsIn another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.
First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.
They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.
Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.
Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.
That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup
Go to comments