Semi Radradra voices a concern about Fiji despite second warm-up win
Semi Radradra has issued a warning to Fiji despite their second successive Rugby World Cup warm-up win. The Fijians defeated Samoa 33-19 in Apia on Saturday to add to their 36-20 victory last weekend over Tonga.
However, this weekend’s skipper Radradra wasn’t completely satisfied that his team were now two wins from two just weeks out from their tournament opener versus Wales in Bordeaux on September 10.
What caused the midfielder anxiety was the inability of Fiji for the second successive weekend to build on a promising half-time position. They led the Tongans 26-15 at the break in Lautoka but were restricted to just a 10-5 score in the second half.
Against Samoa, who last week won away to Japan in Sapporo, Fiji led 30-5 at half-time but they were outscored 3-14 in the second half and it was this fall-off that Radradra placed emphasis on when speaking post-game.
In quotes published by the Fiji Sun, Radradra said: “We knew Manu Samoa was tough and we stuck together going into the game. It was tough and we allowed them [Samoa] to come back in the second half.”
Hooker Tevita Ikanivere (two) and centre Iosefo Masi scored tries to have Fiji comfortably 17-0 lead ahead before Samoa struck with a Christian Leali’ifano try. That concession was the cue for Fiji to again dominate the first-half scoreboard, Selestino Ravutaumada grabbing his team’s fourth try and Caleb Muntz adding points off the kicking tee to secure their 25-point interval advantage.
It was needed as Samoa hit back with a couple of second-half tries to cut the eventual Fijian margin of victory to 14 points.
Latest Comments
The only benefit of the draft idea is league competitiveness. There would be absolutely no commercial value in a draft with rugby’s current interest levels.
I wonder what came first in america? I’m assuming it’s commercial aspect just built overtime and was a side effect essentially.
But the idea is not without merit as a goal. The first step towards being able to implement a draft being be creating it’s source of draftees. Where would you have the players come from? NFL uses college, and players of an age around 22 are generally able to step straight into the NFL. Baseball uses School and kids (obviously nowhere near pro level being 3/4 years younger) are sent to minor league clubs for a few years, the equivalent of the Super Rugby academies. I don’t think the latter is possible legally, and probably the most unethical and pointless, so do we create a University scene that builds on and up from the School scene? There is a lot of merit in that and it would tie in much better with our future partners in Japan and America.
Can we used the club scene and dispose of the Super Rugby academies? The benefit of this is that players have no association to their Super side, ie theyre not being drafted elshwere after spending time as a Blues or Chiefs player etc, it removes the negative of investing in a player just to benefit another club. The disadvantage of course is that now the players have nowhere near the quality of coaching and each countries U20s results will suffer (supposedly).
Or are we just doing something really dirty and making a rule that the only players under the age of 22 (that can sign a pro contract..) that a Super side can contract are those that come from the draft? Any player wanting to upgrade from an academy to full contract has to opt into the draft?
Go to commentsUse club rugby.
You’ve got the perfect structure to run your 1A and 1B on a quota of club representation by Province. Have some balance/reward system in place to promote and reward competitiveness/excellence. Say each bracket has 12 teams, each province 3 spots, given the Irish Shield winner once of the bottom ranked provinces spots, so the twelve teams that make up 1A are 4 from Leinster, 3 each from Connacht and Munster, and 2 from Ulster etc. Run the same rule over 1B from the 1A reults/winner/bottom team etc. I’d imagine IRFU would want to keep participation to at least two teams from any one province but if not, and there was reason for more flexibility and competitveness, you can simply have other ways to change the numbers, like caps won by each province for the year prior or something.
Then give those clubs sides much bigger incentive to up their game, say instead of using the Pro sides for the British and Irish Cup you had going, it’s these best club sides that get to represent Ireland. There is plenty of interest in semi pro club cup competitions in europe that Ireland can invest in or drive their own creation of.
Go to comments