Sergio Parisse uncovers exactly what he went through when retiring
Italian rugby legend Sergio Parisse never wanted to stop. Ending his rugby career was always his biggest fear, as he confessed to Mathieu Bastareaud in the BastaShow, exclusively on RugbyPass TV.
“My passion for this sport is almost an obsession,” admits the former number eight, who was capped 142 times between 2002 and 2019.
“I've been playing and breathing rugby since I was a kid. When you're used to it for so many years, you're afraid to stop. There was a fear of saying to yourself: ‘when it's over, it's over’. And today I realise that.
“All the emotions I experienced on the pitch as a player are over. And even though I only stopped playing a short while ago, I already miss it.”
Victim of a typhoon
His international career came to an abrupt end on 12 October 2019, when it was swept away by Typhoon Hagibis, which forced World Rugby to cancel the final two pool matches of the Rugby World Cup in Japan.
For Parisse, that match against New Zealand (ironically the country he started his international career against) would have been his last. He had announced it, he had prepared for it. But Hagibis decided otherwise.
For a long time, the back-row felt a certain bitterness, but he was able to move on and dedicate himself to a club career that lasted 21 years. 377 games in all for just three clubs: Benetton Treviso (2002-2005), Stade Français (2005-2019) and RC Toulon (2019-2023).
It was in Toulon on 19 May 2023 that the player announced the definitive end of his career, on the evening of their Challenge Cup victory, at the same time as Bastareaud. This time, the well-deserved farewell was honoured.
Both stayed with their clubs. Basta became manager and Parisse was handed the keys to the touchline, an area in which he had always excelled. But the transition was not an easy one.
A change of life
“Today it's going very well compared to the beginning,” he tells BastaShow. “Not necessarily in terms of training. In fact, I had issues organising my life. For 20, 22 years, your schedules, the way you organise your training, your matches, your care, everything is done, everything is planned, and you follow it.
“When you're used to doing that for 20 years, from the moment you become a coach, when you spend more time in the office, in front of the computer, preparing for training sessions and staying afterwards, your life changes and your schedule changes completely.
“It was difficult for me at first to get back into this dynamic, this new rhythm. Now I've found my own pace and rhythm. I feel better.”
Used to being taken by the hand, this time it was he who took the others by the hand.
“I was surprised by the amount of work that goes into training, preparation and relationships with the players,” he admits.
“I was lucky enough to start my coaching career at the same club where I finished, so I coach a lot of players that I shared the pitch with. That's made it easier for me to develop a human relationship with the players. I know what each player's personality is like, who the more introverted players are, who you need to talk to in private...
“It wasn't very complicated because I knew the group. But I was very surprised by the amount of work that went into it.”
The difficulty of getting the same message across
The biggest difficulty for him has been trying to get his message across to players who are more or less receptive to it.
“Sometimes it's very frustrating. But that's the beauty of the job,” he says. “When you coach, you coach a lot of players, not just one. I have a guy like Esteban Abadie and when you talk to him about the touchline, we see the same things. On the other hand, there's another player - I won't mention any names - that's where the coach has to be good, and that's what I try to be, to adapt your way of communicating and giving information.
“At first, it's a bit frustrating, you think: How can you not see that, it's obvious!’ But I'm learning. The aim is for everyone to understand.”
Controlling emotions
The other difficulty Sergio Parisse has had to face is managing his emotions during a match. After all, you don't wipe away 21 years of a player's career in a few months by becoming the man who gives instructions, trains his successors and watches (and suffers!) from the stands.
“I remember my first game as a coach,” he recalls. “We were at Lyon. We'd played two warm-up games, and this was our first Top 14 match. The adrenaline was pumping. I was stressed, I was shaking.
“And at half-time, I felt like a player. I wanted to pass on a message to the players, but I was too emotional. When I'm a player and I see my coach coming off the pitch all stressed out, it's going to stress me out even more. When you're a player, you need a calm, clear coach who says the right things. That was difficult.
“I have a little bit more experience. You can prepare your training sessions during the week, but on match day, that's when you have to be really good because you have to control your emotions. You're not playing, so you can't control anything on the pitch. But you have to be able to convey emotions while being clear and precise. You must have the right balance.
“I know that experience will help me to strike the right balance between conveying emotions, because in our sport that's very important, and at the same time being clear-headed and very clear when you pass on your messages to the players.”
Now in fourth place in the Top 14 with two games remaining before the finals, Sergio Parisse has not failed in his mission and has improved with time. It will have taken him at least one season to settle into the new role, but now he's content in this new life in rugby.
Latest Comments
Yes that’s what WR needs to look at. Football had the same problem with european powerhouses getting all the latin talent then you’re gaurenteed to get the odd late bloomer (21/22 etc, all the best footballers can play for the country much younger to get locked) star changing his allegiance.
They used youth rep selection for locking national elifibilty at one point etc. Then later only counted residency after the age of 18 (make clubs/nations like in this case wait even longer).
That’s what I’m talking about, not changing allegiance in rugby (were it can only be captured by the senior side), where it is still the senior side. Oh yeah, good point about CJ, so in most cases we probably want kids to be able to switch allegiance, were say someone like Lemoto could rep Tonga (if he wasn’t so good) but still play for Australia’s seniors, while in someone like Kite’s (the last aussie kid to go to France) case he’ll be French qualified via 5 years residency at the age of 21, so France to lock him up before Aussie even get a chance to select him. But if we use footballs regulations, who I’m suggesting WR need to get their a into g replicating, he would only start his 5 years once he turns 18 or whatever, meaning 23 yo is as soon as anyone can switch, and when if they’re good enough teams like NZ and Aus can select them (France don’t give a f, they select anybody just to lock them).
Go to commentsThe only benefit of the draft idea is league competitiveness. There would be absolutely no commercial value in a draft with rugby’s current interest levels.
I wonder what came first in america? I’m assuming it’s commercial aspect just built overtime and was a side effect essentially.
But the idea is not without merit as a goal. The first step towards being able to implement a draft being be creating it’s source of draftees. Where would you have the players come from? NFL uses college, and players of an age around 22 are generally able to step straight into the NFL. Baseball uses School and kids (obviously nowhere near pro level being 3/4 years younger) are sent to minor league clubs for a few years, the equivalent of the Super Rugby academies. I don’t think the latter is possible legally, and probably the most unethical and pointless, so do we create a University scene that builds on and up from the School scene? There is a lot of merit in that and it would tie in much better with our future partners in Japan and America.
Can we used the club scene and dispose of the Super Rugby academies? The benefit of this is that players have no association to their Super side, ie theyre not being drafted elshwere after spending time as a Blues or Chiefs player etc, it removes the negative of investing in a player just to benefit another club. The disadvantage of course is that now the players have nowhere near the quality of coaching and each countries U20s results will suffer (supposedly).
Or are we just doing something really dirty and making a rule that the only players under the age of 22 (that can sign a pro contract..) that a Super side can contract are those that come from the draft? Any player wanting to upgrade from an academy to full contract has to opt into the draft?
Go to comments